There seems to be an uptick in anti-gun legislation. Since McDonald there should have been a re-thinking of anti-gun legislation by all elected officials, especially at the federal level. Instead, we are getting laws implemented by executive order, regulatory authority, and interpretive enforcement. All of this activity is clearly unconstitutional and in some cases illegal.
Why is this? Are the anti-gunners trying to bleed the finances of gun supporting organizations through unnecessary court battles just prior to the 2012 elections?...
Or, are they trying to score political points with their base prior to elections season?...
Or, do they see the writing on the wall and are trying to pump as much anti-gun stuff through the legislature and regulatory agencies before power slips away next fall?
The first question concerns me and I hope that our pro 2A organizations can forecast that sort of tactic.
Why is this? Are the anti-gunners trying to bleed the finances of gun supporting organizations through unnecessary court battles just prior to the 2012 elections?...
Or, are they trying to score political points with their base prior to elections season?...
Or, do they see the writing on the wall and are trying to pump as much anti-gun stuff through the legislature and regulatory agencies before power slips away next fall?
The first question concerns me and I hope that our pro 2A organizations can forecast that sort of tactic.


Comment