Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Bond v. United States and Federal Guns Laws

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    Quser.619
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 777

    How much you want to bet that some pro marijuana group is already planning their suit against Federal Drug laws for medical marijuana. Well after the brownies that is...

    Funny, I can't imagine that using this ruling in over-turning ridiculous Federal firearms laws will be as unanimous in decision if any case utilizing this ruling ever makes it to the SCOTUS
    sigpic

    Comment

    • #17
      sholling
      I need a LIFE!!
      CGN Contributor
      • Sep 2007
      • 10360

      Originally posted by Quser.619
      How much you want to bet that some pro marijuana group is already planning their suit against Federal Drug laws for medical marijuana. Well after the brownies that is...
      Let's hope not. While the 4 conservatives and the centrist would likely be sympathetic to a lawsuit against guns laws - like the gun free school zone, their anti-drug prejudices would leave them far too tempted rule against the the 10th Amendment in a drug case.
      Last edited by sholling; 06-16-2011, 10:24 PM.
      "Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." --FREDERIC BASTIAT--

      Proud Life Member: National Rifle Association, the Second Amendment Foundation, and the California Rifle & Pistol Association

      Comment

      • #18
        ChuangTzu
        Member
        • Jul 2009
        • 164

        That already happened with Raich. Standing wasn't controversial, but the medical marijuana case was tried and lost. It was one of those "by not participating in interstate commerce, you are affecting interstate commerce" cases...

        Comment

        • #19
          ddestruel
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2009
          • 887

          lots of potential both ways if this case is used properly to bolster the right arguments many federal over-reaches could fall but i suspect it will be handled prematurely and bad rulings will weaken the potential uses of this case
          NRA Life member, multi organization continued donor etc etc etc

          Comment

          • #20
            Funtimes
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2010
            • 949

            Seems like this could set the stage for a destruction of Federal GFSZ', and a slew of other laws and regulations.
            Lawyer, but not your lawyer. Posts aren't legal advice.

            Comment

            • #21
              kcbrown
              Calguns Addict
              • Apr 2009
              • 9097

              The concurring opinion is particularly juicy:


              Wow. The environment suddenly just got a lot more target-rich.
              The Constitution is not "the Supreme Law of the Land, except in the face of contradicting law which has not yet been overturned by the courts". It is THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, PERIOD. You break your oath to uphold the Constitution if you don't refuse to enforce unadjudicated laws you believe are Unconstitutional.

              The real world laughs at optimism. And here's why.

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1