Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

1994 assault weapon ban?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dont_tread_on_me
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 12

    1994 assault weapon ban?

    How long did it take from when the public knew of, to when the ban took effect?
  • #2
    the_quark
    Senior Member
    • May 2006
    • 1003

    If you mean the Federal "ban" - don't forget that "ban" is a strong word - it just banned manufacture. You could still buy sell and trade them. So, it just made them, over time, more rare and expensive.
    Brett Thomas - @the_quark on Twitter -
    Founding CGF Director and Treasurer; NRA Life Member; Ex-CRPA Director and Life Member; SAF Life Member; Plaintiff

    Comment

    • #3
      tonelar
      Dinosaur
      • Mar 2008
      • 6080

      The quark?
      Are you talking about magazines or assault weapons?

      OP
      it got voted in and people had time to panic buy all the ARs and AKs at drastically increased prices.
      sigpic

      Comment

      • #4
        jamesob
        Veteran Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 4821

        if i remember right the bill was passed then it took effect 1 year later. you could still buy them after the ban but they couldn't be made anymore exept for mil/leo

        Comment

        • #5
          CHS
          Moderator Emeritus
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Jan 2008
          • 11338

          Originally posted by tonelar
          The quark?
          Are you talking about magazines or assault weapons?
          The '94 ban covered both.
          Please read the Calguns Wiki
          Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
          --Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"

          Comment

          • #6
            Librarian
            Admin and Poltergeist
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Oct 2005
            • 44633

            Signed Sept. 13, 1994, with lots of publicity leading up to the final passage. Took effect immediately.
            ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

            Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

            Comment

            • #7
              gunsandrockets
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2009
              • 1537

              The great gun panic of 1992-1994

              Originally posted by dont_tread_on_me
              How long did it take from when the public knew of, to when the ban took effect?
              The legislation took months to grind it's way through Congress. Many arms were twisted in Congress to pass the bill, and I believe it barely squeaked through the House of Representatives despite a hefty Democratic Party majority.

              So from the victory of Clinton in November 1992, until the passage of the ban in 1994 the gun market freaked out. Prices skyrocketed as demand totally outstripped the available supply of items threatened by the ban. A lot of people spent of a lot of money back then. And a lot of profit was made by savvy traders too. It took years for prices to settle back down. And some items such as original capacity Glock pistol magazines never recovered, at least not until the ban finally sunsetted in 2004.

              The exact same thing happened back in 1989 when the very first AW ban in the country passed into law in California. Except the panic market was shorter lived, only lasting a few months.
              Guns don't kill people, Democrats kill people

              Comment

              • #8
                the_quark
                Senior Member
                • May 2006
                • 1003

                Originally posted by tonelar
                The quark?
                Are you talking about magazines or assault weapons?

                OP
                it got voted in and people had time to panic buy all the ARs and AKs at drastically increased prices.
                Both. It did technically ban possession of either mags or rifles that had been manufactured after the date. But it didn't make it illegal to buy, sell, trade or possess rifles or magazines made prior to the law going into effect in 1994.
                Brett Thomas - @the_quark on Twitter -
                Founding CGF Director and Treasurer; NRA Life Member; Ex-CRPA Director and Life Member; SAF Life Member; Plaintiff

                Comment

                • #9
                  Army
                  Veteran Member
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 3915

                  Recall, that Congress was instantly voter changed to strongly Republican because of this law.
                  "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself...A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."......Cicero

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    dustoff31
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 8209

                    Originally posted by the_quark
                    If you mean the Federal "ban" - don't forget that "ban" is a strong word - it just banned manufacture. You could still buy sell and trade them. So, it just made them, over time, more rare and expensive.
                    IIRC, it also banned the importation of AWs.
                    "Did I say "republic?" By God, yes, I said "republic!" Long live the glorious republic of the United States of America. Damn democracy. It is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no less often by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of socialism, miscegenation, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to individuals whose virtuous principles make them offensive." - Westbrook Pegler

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1