Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

ATF and rights restoration.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dantodd
    Calguns Addict
    • Aug 2009
    • 9360

    ATF and rights restoration.

    With all the discussion of earmarks is it advisable to try and get a congresscritter to earmark funding for the ATF group that reviews rights reinstatement requests?

    My experience is that any federal program like that would be damn near impossible to kill and would mean that many people would have a path to regaining their 2A rights.

    However; this would also take away some of the powder from legal challenges regarding certain convictions because those people would have recourse where today there is none.

    So, to earmark and help many now or leave the program dormant and work through the courts to narrow prohibiting offenses?
    Coyote Point Armory
    341 Beach Road
    Burlingame CA 94010
    650-315-2210
    http://CoyotePointArmory.com
  • #2
    anthonyca
    Calguns Addict
    • May 2008
    • 6316

    I thought about this also. What if someone wanted to pay for it themselves instead of going through the courts? The problem is I see is the ATF already doesn't care about rights so giving them the final say is not going to get anyone's rights restored.

    How is this process currently supposed to work? I know there is no funding.
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Union...70812799700206

    Originally posted by Wherryj
    I am a physician. I am held to being "the expert" in medicine. I can't fall back on feigned ignorance and the statement that the patient should have known better than I. When an officer "can't be expected to know the entire penal code", but a citizen is held to "ignorance is no excuse", this is equivalent to ME being able to sue my patient for my own malpractice-after all, the patient should have known better, right?

    Comment

    • #3
      cmichini
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2008
      • 1739

      ATF's job (just like CA DOJ) is to create criminals from law-abiding intentioned citizens. They are NOT there to help you, protect your rights or fight in the name of justice.
      They are there to manipulate the wording of the laws (intent of the laws be damned) to create criminals and thereby justify their existence in the government budget.

      At least that's how I view their reason for being. YMMV
      NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
      NRA Certified Range Safety Officer

      Comment

      • #4
        Uriah02
        Veteran Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 3149


        This Op-Ed sums up the direction of the BATFE quiet well.
        sigpic
        OIF 07-09 Veteran
        NRA Endowment Member, CRPA Life Member

        Comment

        • #5
          dustoff31
          Calguns Addict
          • Apr 2007
          • 8209

          Originally posted by dantodd
          With all the discussion of earmarks is it advisable to try and get a congresscritter to earmark funding for the ATF group that reviews rights reinstatement requests?

          My experience is that any federal program like that would be damn near impossible to kill and would mean that many people would have a path to regaining their 2A rights.

          However; this would also take away some of the powder from legal challenges regarding certain convictions because those people would have recourse where today there is none.

          So, to earmark and help many now or leave the program dormant and work through the courts to narrow prohibiting offenses?
          Very little chance for any politicians to place earmarks on this deal for several reasons:

          1. Earmarks aren't really in vogue right now.
          2. It simply isn't important to them. They haven't seen fit to fund it so far, why would they now?
          3. They or their friends and familes can't profit from it in any way.
          4. None of them want to run on "I helped put guns back in the hands of felons/druggies/wife beaters, etc." or defend themselves against those charges by opponents.
          Last edited by dustoff31; 12-31-2010, 2:06 PM.
          "Did I say "republic?" By God, yes, I said "republic!" Long live the glorious republic of the United States of America. Damn democracy. It is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no less often by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of socialism, miscegenation, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to individuals whose virtuous principles make them offensive." - Westbrook Pegler

          Comment

          • #6
            Beatone
            Veteran Member
            • Dec 2005
            • 4053

            Originally posted by cmichini
            ATF's job (just like CA DOJ) is to create criminals from law-abiding intentioned citizens. They are NOT there to help you, protect your rights or fight in the name of justice.
            They are there to manipulate the wording of the laws (intent of the laws be damned) to create criminals and thereby justify their existence in the government budget.

            At least that's how I view their reason for being. YMMV
            I think you hit the nail on the head, I agree completely.
            sigpicNRA Life Member

            Comment

            • #7
              Pred@tor
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2005
              • 768

              www.atfabuse.com/ You seriously want those guys to determine whether you have rights or not? The reason im probably never going to get a FFL is because of how they operate and say one thing then the next day its wrong. They can send you a full auto AK in the mail and claim its not a machine gun and then say it is and screw you over. No thanks...
              "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
              Thomas Jefferson

              Californian born and orginally from the Central Coast (Arroyo Grande, CA) who is currently serving in the Air National Guard of Missouri.

              Comment

              • #8
                GrizzlyGuy
                Gun Runner to The Stars
                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                • May 2009
                • 5468

                Originally posted by Uriah02
                http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...n-d-williamson
                This Op-Ed sums up the direction of the BATFE quiet well.
                I love this part:

                Plenty of earmarked money goes to help unionized workers but things only get worse instead of better. Giving money to BATFE for rights restoration would probably have the same result.
                Gun law complexity got you down? Get the FAQs, Jack!

                sigpic

                Comment

                • #9
                  N6ATF
                  Banned
                  • Jul 2007
                  • 8383

                  Two things that don't belong in the same sentence. ATF and rights. LOL

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    AJAX22
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • May 2006
                    • 14980

                    The batfe does not regulate tobacco and alcohol anymore, those are under treasury.

                    They have a 1.2 billion dollar budget to regulate a 4 billion dollar industry.

                    And the broadest powers of any enforcement agency.
                    Youtube Channel Proto-Ordnance

                    Subscribe to Proto Ordnance

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1