Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

H.R.17 Citizens Self Defense Act of 2009

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IrishPirate
    Calguns Addict
    • Aug 2009
    • 6390

    H.R.17 Citizens Self Defense Act of 2009

    I searched all the forums I could think of and couldnt find this so I'm posting it. If it's already been done and my searching skills suck....sorry.

    Anyways, H.R.17 is a bill I learned about early this year and since then haven't been able to find out what happened to it. The best info I've found says it's still being discussed and hasn't left the House of Representatives for the Senate yet. Hopefully it hasn't gotten struck down.

    The Link: H.R.17 (from this site)

    If you haven't heard about this, check it out, then contact your representative and tell them you want them to vote yes on H.R.17 (if it's still around). If you've already heard of it and done so....what's another phone call/email going to hurt?
    sigpic
    Most civilization is based on cowardice. It's so easy to civilize by teaching cowardice. You water down the standards which would lead to bravery. You restrain the will. You regulate the appetites. You fence in the horizons. You make a law for every movement. You deny the existence of chaos. You teach even the children to breathe slowly. You tame.
    People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Governments, Governments Should Be Afraid Of Their People

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
  • #2
    freakshow10mm
    Veteran Member
    • Jun 2008
    • 3061

    (b) Firearm Defined- As used in subsection (a), the term ‘firearm’ means--

    (1) a shotgun (as defined in section 921(a)(5) of title 18, United States Code);

    (2) a rifle (as defined in section 921(a)(7) of title 18, United States Code); or

    (3) a handgun (as defined in section 10 of Public Law 99-408).
    Nope. Don't like it. No mention of NFA firearms.

    Comment

    • #3
      GrizzlyGuy
      Gun Runner to The Stars
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • May 2009
      • 5468

      My congressman (Tom McClintock, IMHO one of the best in all of Congress) is a co-sponsor. Looks like it has gone nowhere.

      I forgot to ask him about it when he was up here meeting with constituents a couple weeks ago, although I did get some questions in about the FED, auditing it, getting rid of it, etc. Tom's on board. Now if we could just convince him to run for President...
      Gun law complexity got you down? Get the FAQs, Jack!

      sigpic

      Comment

      • #4
        IrishPirate
        Calguns Addict
        • Aug 2009
        • 6390

        I've heard good things from lots of people about McClintock. My Rep Wally Herger (not that great IMHO) says he supports it too though i'm not sure if he's actually a co-sponsor. Freakshow, since it's still in the HR, maybe there's time to get NFAs added. It's dumb that things will get overlooked like that, but a few emails and phone calls could get it taken care of. This one could be a major victory for gun owners, and seeing as most people dont own NFA guns, i think it's still good. You're right though, NFA should be protected too.
        sigpic
        Most civilization is based on cowardice. It's so easy to civilize by teaching cowardice. You water down the standards which would lead to bravery. You restrain the will. You regulate the appetites. You fence in the horizons. You make a law for every movement. You deny the existence of chaos. You teach even the children to breathe slowly. You tame.
        People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Governments, Governments Should Be Afraid Of Their People

        ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

        Comment

        • #5
          Shotgun Man
          Veteran Member
          • Oct 2007
          • 4053

          Originally posted by freakshow10mm
          Nope. Don't like it. No mention of NFA firearms.
          Who cares that NFA items are not included? The bill would achieve an advancement of our 2A rights. Let not perfect be the enemy of good.
          Last edited by Shotgun Man; 12-11-2009, 2:53 PM.

          Comment

          • #6
            Kid Stanislaus
            Veteran Member
            • Dec 2008
            • 4419

            After the mid-term elections this sort of thing will do much better in Congress but will still be vetoed by BHO UNLESS the political heat is on and he see's it'll hurt him in 2012.
            Last edited by Kid Stanislaus; 12-11-2009, 3:26 PM. Reason: Elucidation
            Things usually turn out best for those who make the best of how things turn out.

            Comment

            • #7
              CHS
              Moderator Emeritus
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Jan 2008
              • 11338

              Originally posted by Shotgun Man
              Who cares that NFA items are not included? The bill would achieve an advancement of our 2A rights. Let not perfect be the enemy of good.
              I agree. Putting NFA items in there would most likely end up being a poison pill to people who would otherwise vote for it.

              Advancing NFA is still a few years off.
              Please read the Calguns Wiki
              Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
              --Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"

              Comment

              • #8
                gun toting monkeyboy
                Calguns Addict
                • Aug 2008
                • 6820

                Baby steps people. We take lots of little steps, and in the not too distant future, it ain't us that's the frog in that pot of boiling water. There are many big brains with carefully laid out plans working on this if I am reading the tea leaves right. Once incorporation is in place, they are going to smack the snot out of the antis in court again and again and again.
                Originally posted by aplinker
                It's OK not to post when you have no clue what you're talking about.

                Comment

                • #9
                  freakshow10mm
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 3061

                  Originally posted by Shotgun Man
                  Who cares that NFA items are not included? The bill would achieve an advancement of our 2A rights. Let not perfect be the enemy of good.
                  I care. A gun is a gun no matter what it shoots or how it shoots. This nit picking bull**** with "getting our gun rights back" is tiresome. Simple have it state "firearm as defined in 18 USC 922. Done. That includes both Title I and Title II weapons.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    EscapeFromCal
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 833

                    My congressman (Tom McClintock, IMHO one of the best in all of Congress) is a co-sponsor

                    +1 Tom McClintock should have been our governor instead of Arnold. Talk about getting in the way of progress!

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      k1dude
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • May 2009
                      • 13754

                      Another +1 for McClintock. I voted for him for Governor and Congress. He's a good man with a good head on his shoulders.
                      "Show me a young conservative and I'll show you a man without a heart. Show me an old liberal and I'll show you a man without a brain." - Sir Winston Churchill

                      "I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Senator Barry Goldwater

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        loather
                        Senior Member
                        • Jun 2009
                        • 909

                        It's kind of sad that we have this law becoming necessary. Isn't that what the second amendment to the united states constitution ultimately grants to us? It should be noted that while self-defense is not an enumerated right as such, it's implicit with the phrase, "... life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness ..." -- if I'm in a situation where I need to use my second amendment rights to defend myself, I'm fairly certain that all three of the above would be in jeopardy.

                        Realistically though, in today's world you have to worry about the three being violated from both sides: the criminals who wish to deprive you of them, and the government who will try it's damnedest to deny them of you after you attempt to protect them. Sickening.

                        I dunno. Just a thought.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Librarian
                          Admin and Poltergeist
                          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                          • Oct 2005
                          • 44633

                          Originally posted by IrishPirate
                          I searched all the forums I could think of and couldnt find this so I'm posting it. If it's already been done and my searching skills suck....sorry.

                          Anyways, H.R.17 is a bill I learned about early this year and since then haven't been able to find out what happened to it. The best info I've found says it's still being discussed and hasn't left the House of Representatives for the Senate yet. Hopefully it hasn't gotten struck down.

                          The Link: H.R.17 (from this site)

                          If you haven't heard about this, check it out, then contact your representative and tell them you want them to vote yes on H.R.17 (if it's still around). If you've already heard of it and done so....what's another phone call/email going to hurt?
                          The best source for the status of Federal legislation is Thomas.loc.gov (someone already posted the link to the bill). The site does suffer from a time-lag problem when things are happening quickly, but I fear that's not avoidable.
                          ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

                          Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            IrishPirate
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 6390

                            Originally posted by freakshow10mm
                            I care. A gun is a gun no matter what it shoots or how it shoots. This nit picking bull**** with "getting our gun rights back" is tiresome. Simple have it state "firearm as defined in 18 USC 922. Done. That includes both Title I and Title II weapons.
                            you're right, but if this passes it'll be ammo to get NFAs incorporated shortly after, once people realize that not including certain guns is wrong and unfairly limits our 2A rights.
                            sigpic
                            Most civilization is based on cowardice. It's so easy to civilize by teaching cowardice. You water down the standards which would lead to bravery. You restrain the will. You regulate the appetites. You fence in the horizons. You make a law for every movement. You deny the existence of chaos. You teach even the children to breathe slowly. You tame.
                            People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Governments, Governments Should Be Afraid Of Their People

                            ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            UA-8071174-1