Gun owners' duty... Agree or Disagree?

[Ding126]

http://www.berkshireeagle.com/ci_13759315?source=most_viewed

[M. Sage]

Agree with what? That the author of that article is a moron? 100%.

[nrakid88]

They just dont get it.... Guns save lives... its there damn laws that disarm the public that are costing lives, the law abiding cant legally defend themselves and thus don't... the mentally and criminally unstable don't care about said laws and now enjoy there shooting spree without worrying about getting shot back at.

Guns don't kill people, Politicians taking their guns away does.

Idiots how hard is it to understand?

[nrakid88]

I would have to say I disagree, just because the SUpreme Court is protecting our rights doesnt mean we should stop pushing to get guns in the hands of any good person that wants one.

[Turo]

Agree with what? That the author of that article is a moron? 100%.

+1

support laws to realistically, reasonably and now constitutionally to at least begin the process of finally trying to make some headway in decreasing gun violence.

I support decreasing violence. I do not support removing law-abiding citizen's rights in order to achieve less violence.

Besides, there's already laws in place to do that, I suggest we enforce them, rather than making for new feel-good laws that do nothing but provide "peace of mind" for idiots that believe in that flawed concept.

I support the death penalty, and the right to self-defense. With those we can reduce violence.

[M. Sage]

Self-defense is the best way to reduce violence. Violence begets violence, after all. Offer it to me and it may beget more than you can handle.

[Southwest Chuck]

Self-defense is the best way to reduce violence. Violence begets violence, after all. Offer it to me and it may beget more than you can handle.

Want to be a movie star, then?
Read this: http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=246919

[IrishPirate]

I'm all for dissarming criminals.....but that wont happen until we are allowed to arm ourselves and defend ourselves in the absence of any police protection...something they are not obligated to provide. So basically, give law abiding citizens as many guns as they want, and make criminals so affraid of using guns that the problem simply dissappears.

I love that they say that guns weren't made for target shooting. Lots of stuff we use today doesn't follow its original purpose. It's the evolution of technology. Yes they still are capable of fulfilling their original intentions, but they have new roles to fill also and you can't say that just because it's original purpose was deadly, that all other purposes should also be banned.

I almost started laughing uncontrollably when he insinuated that hunting isn't necessary because of supermarkets. I love how blissfully ignorant people can be when they've never done a decent days work with their hands. these are the people i want to trick into getting into a rocket aimed at the sun.

[Ding126]

I'm all for dissarming criminals.....but that wont happen until we are allowed to arm ourselves and defend ourselves in the absence of any police protection...something they are not obligated to provide. So basically, give law abiding citizens as many guns as they want, and make criminals so affraid of using guns that the problem simply dissappears.

I love that they say that guns weren't made for target shooting. Lots of stuff we use today doesn't follow its original purpose. It's the evolution of technology. Yes they still are capable of fulfilling their original intentions, but they have new roles to fill also and you can't say that just because it's original purpose was deadly, that all other purposes should also be banned.

I almost started laughing uncontrollably when he insinuated that hunting isn't necessary because of supermarkets. I love how blissfully ignorant people can be when they've never done a decent days work with their hands. these are the people i want to trick into getting into a rocket aimed at the sun.

+1 I agree

[MP301]

http://www.berkshireeagle.com/ci_137...ce=most_viewed law-abiding gun owners and their organizations should, especially in view of the of the latest mass killing at Ft. Hood, support laws to realistically, reasonably and now constitutionally to at least begin the process of finally trying to make some headway in decreasing gun violence.
Robert "Frank" Jakubowicz, a Pittsfield lawyer, is a former FBI agent and assistant district attorney.

We are. Thats why we are working so hard to arm the right people... It didnt work the other way around, now did it? It never will work the other way...BG's will always get guns and other weapons...F-stick

[kf6tac]

I support laws that realistically, reasonably and constitutionally reduce gun violence. None of the laws we're seeing are any of those three.

[phamkl]

LOL.

State of the art automatic handguns.

You mean the ones running on the same premise as the state of the art handguns designed about a century ago?

[radioman]

Late one night I was in San Francisco, 19th & mission looking for some food. At the time I drove limo's for a living, so I was dressed to the 9's, right down to the London fog. Anyway some fool wanted to rob me. I said ok let me get my wallet, I put my hand inside my coat and pulled my ppk, yes I kept my money and he went to get the poop out if his pants.

[SLYoteBoy]

http://www.berkshireeagle.com/ci_137...ce=most_viewedpeople kill people with (insert anything here). . . "

Fixed it

[Kid Stanislaus]

As long as district attorneys are allowed to plea bargain away charges stemming from the illegal use of firearms there will never be a solution.