Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

9th Circuit just released decision on Duncan v. Bonta

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MajorSideburns
    Senior Member
    • May 2013
    • 1524

    9th Circuit just released decision on Duncan v. Bonta

    They ruled the California ban on magazines over 10 rounds in capacity is constitutional and does not violate the 2nd Amendment.
    Last edited by MajorSideburns; 03-21-2025, 12:46 PM.
  • #2
    Grendel Guy
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 1359

    ?

    Comment

    • #3
      XDJYo
      Calguns Addict
      • Apr 2012
      • 6142

      Yeah, you should've listened to that other voice in your head that told you that drunk posting on CG is NOT a good idea.
      Les Baer 1911: Premier II w/1.5" Guarantee, Blued, No FCS, Combat Rear, F/O Front, Checkered MSH & SA Professional Double Diamond Grips
      Springfield Armory XD-45 4" Service Model
      Springfield Armory XD9 4" Service Model (wifes).
      M&P 15 (Mine)

      Comment

      • #4
        Grendel Guy
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 1359

        Yeah, I've done it before only to regret it later.

        Comment

        • #5
          WOODY2
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2015
          • 1188

          You were supposed to save this post for 4-1-25 or didn't you get the memo?

          Comment

          • #6
            MajorSideburns
            Senior Member
            • May 2013
            • 1524

            Originally posted by Ishootforblood

            You suck.
            The good news is this should finally be headed to the Supreme Court.

            Comment

            • #7
              MajorSideburns
              Senior Member
              • May 2013
              • 1524

              Originally posted by WOODY2
              You were supposed to save this post for 4-1-25 or didn't you get the memo?
              Sorry, every day feels like April fool's when it comes to 9th Circus rulings.

              Comment

              • #8
                MajorSideburns
                Senior Member
                • May 2013
                • 1524

                Originally posted by Ishootforblood
                Little attention seeking “jokes” damage your credibility.
                It wasn't so much meant as a malicious joke as letting out frustration upon hearing the news with sarcasm. I guess we all should have known it was coming but I was still holding out hope the "judges" on the En Banc panel would do the right thing. One of the dissenting judges made a very good video explaining the ruling on the official court's Youtube account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMC7Ntd4d4c

                Anyway, I don't know how to delete the thread, I can't find the option anywhere.
                Last edited by MajorSideburns; 03-21-2025, 11:26 AM.

                Comment

                • #9
                  TrappedinCalifornia
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Jan 2018
                  • 7565

                  Originally posted by MajorSideburns

                  The good news is this should finally be headed to the Supreme Court.
                  I'd say that's reasonable fodder for a betting pool and I haven't gambled for money in decades.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    ojisan
                    Agent 86
                    CGN Contributor
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 11737

                    Originally posted by MajorSideburns

                    It wasn't so much meant as a malicious joke as letting out frustration upon hearing the news with sarcasm. I guess we all should have known it was coming but I was still holding out hope the "judges" on the En Banc panel would do the right thing. One of the dissenting judges made a very good video explaining the ruling on the official court's Youtube account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMC7Ntd4d4c

                    Anyway, I don't know how to delete the thread, I can't find the option anywhere.
                    You can't delete a thread once it has been started.
                    But you can go to your first post, click Edit, then click "Go advanced".
                    From there you can edit your title, maybe just add "JOKE" after it so those who don't follow the 2A forum will know that 11+ mags are not legal yet.

                    Originally posted by Citadelgrad87
                    I don't really care, I just like to argue.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      The Gleam
                      I need a LIFE!!
                      • Feb 2011
                      • 10869

                      I saw O/P's post last night before any replies, and merely chuckled.

                      As a CRPA/NRA member, and tracking 2nd Amendment concerns in CA in real-time, not to mention that they send you email updates as soon as news happens, I was already aware of the outcome and took no offense to his spoof.

                      No California gun owners should have had a 'gotch ya' moment with that.

                      What I have to wonder though... is why would the O/P's post be the first place or time any California gun-owner would be hearing of the outcome - how could one be duped - unless the affliction of apathy is now a full onset epidemic?

                      Should we get the CDC and WHO involved?

                      Is there a vaccine for that? - (As far as I know, it's called the 2nd Amendment, but you have to be proactive about its health and exercise it.)

                      ---
                      -----------------------------------------------
                      Originally posted by Librarian
                      What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                      If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Grendel Guy
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 1359

                        Well, op's penance will be to police up all reloadable brass from the nearest gun range and send it to the CG brass account. Address will be sent shortly.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Mauserguy
                          Member
                          • Feb 2014
                          • 409

                          How dors this effect freedom week or grandfathered mags?
                          Mauserguy

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            The Gleam
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • Feb 2011
                            • 10869

                            Originally posted by Ishootforblood

                            Reads like a liberal spin doctor, turning the story around. to blame the reader for not already knowing the facts. That’s a lame excuse or justification for posting that crap. We get it, you guys are friends. The down side to the whole thread is the story is no longer the legal update. The focus now becomes the stunt. Lack of credibility seems to a common theme with both of you.
                            Your admonition = admission.

                            "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

                            Join the CRPA/NRA - or something - won't you?

                            ---
                            Last edited by The Gleam; 03-21-2025, 11:37 PM.
                            -----------------------------------------------
                            Originally posted by Librarian
                            What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

                            If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              ar15barrels
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Jan 2006
                              • 56836

                              Originally posted by Mauserguy
                              How dors this effect freedom week or grandfathered mags?
                              Mauserguy
                              Freedom week no longer matters because the statute of limitations on filing charges based on the magazine capacity law is 3 years.
                              Any large capacity mag that's been in CA longer than 3 years is effectively grandfathered.
                              Randall Rausch

                              AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
                              Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
                              Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
                              Barrel, sight and trigger work on most pistols and shotguns.
                              Most work performed while-you-wait.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1