Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

SCAM ALERT Raniersecdotcom

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    The Gleam
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Feb 2011
    • 13657


    Oh, so you mean to convey in the manner by which you are Californicating Alaska with YOUR LIBERAL VIEWS - we should NOT follow your hypocritical path when we may eventually move?

    Californicates Maine, Californicates Oregon.... moves on to Californicate Alaska - chooses to live in the MOST LIBERAL area of Alaska - figures. Liberal is as a Liberal does, I guess; like they say, you can take the Liberal Out of California, but you can't take the Liberal out of the Liberal.

    Is that what YOU mean - do as you say but not as you do?

    Like right here - you recall this little Liberal pissant diatribe of yours, do you not?

    You.... with one of the MOST LIBERAL posts I've seen on Calguns in its more than 20 years - RIGHT HERE:

    Yet, here you are AGAIN with your Liberal bile, you calling for "compromise" gun control to BAN gun purchases for those between the ages of 18-21; BAN adults from buying guns, with a 'compromise' afforded from a militant, dictatorial exception perspective for the military entwined? Sounds rather totalitarian to me....

    What a bizarre gun-control wet-dream, even as the LAW defines those 18-21 as adults, able to own long-guns, yet you would ban that.

    YOUR POST:

    https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/...9&postcount=49

    https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/...d#post21390699


    Originally posted by Endless
    I am very pro second and former military.

    That being said I believe a compromiseI would support a bill that stopped children 18-21 from being able to purchase any firearms, long guns included.

    The only exception would be for our military folks

    You and all your hypocritical "Liberal this/Liberal that" to every other post you make here on Calguns.

    Endless... hypocritical nonsense.


    --------
    -----------------------------------------------
    Originally posted by Librarian
    What compelling interest has any level of government in knowing what guns are owned by civilians? (Those owned by government should be inventoried and tracked, for exactly the same reasons computers and desks and chairs are tracked: responsible care of public property.)

    If some level of government had that information, what would they do with it? How would having that info benefit public safety? How would it benefit law enforcement?

    Comment

    • #17
      DDM4556
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
      CGN Contributor
      • Jun 2014
      • 2601

      Wow. Well said. ^
      iTrader: 52 transactions, 100% positive.

      Comment

      • #18
        Creampuff
        • Jan 2006
        • 3730

        Comment

        • #19
          Mute
          Calguns Addict
          • Oct 2005
          • 8599

          Sure it is. Not even the usual online ammo sellers (who almost always have the cheapest prices) have ammo that cheap.
          NRA Benefactor Life Member
          NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Personal Protection In The Home, Personal Protection Outside The Home Instructor, CA DOJ Certified CCW Instructor, RSO


          American Marksman Training Group
          Visit our American Marksman Facebook Page

          Comment

          Working...
          UA-8071174-1