Australia: Healthy young people dying for 'no reason'

[ibanezfoo]

Got a long way to go to get down under 500,000

[bigbossman]

On no. Unexpectedly is back.

It's not back - someone bumped its old thread.

[Paul_R]

On no. Unexpectedly is back.

It's software was glitching and took time to fix

[LBDamned]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f45S6vmQgA

Non covid excess deaths
Why are people dying more than normal?

UK, excess deaths

Climate change.

Or racism.

Or maybe domestic terrorism... Or some gun thing...

It's gotta be some leftist made up bullchit.

[spitter3]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f45S6vmQgA

Non covid excess deaths
Why are people dying more than normal?

UK, excess deaths

[sl0re10]

On no. Unexpectedly is back.

[Wherryj]

This stuff is HILARIOUS. Try picking up a book on critical thinking. Hint, without at least base rate for comparison, you have nothing.

Thus, why the FDA destroyed the placebo arm in pretty much ALL of their "studies".

[WingDings]

Healthy young people dying for ‘no reason’

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-06-...australia.html

No cap?

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/moderna-covid-vaccine-may-pose-higher-heart-inflammation-risk-us-cdc-2022-06-14/

[LBDamned]

Who took the vaccines first? Which demographics?

The gullible

[Palmaris]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10913639/Children-infected-three-viruses-time-COVID-measures-worn-immune-systems.html

[Dragunov]

Did you
check your sock drawer?

[anthonyca]

This stuff is HILARIOUS. Try picking up a book on critical thinking. Hint, without at least base rate for comparison, you have nothing.

We have a base rate in DMED, life insurance, excess deaths.

Oh yeah, rhey were all just under counting for years by the same rate until the quarter the shots came out. That's it.

[therealnickb]

Who took the vaccines first? Which demographics?

[balgor]

If I follow the book on "critical thinking," am I a sheep or someone who has "critically thought?"

I have always questioned the term "critical thinking" and those who use that term liberally. Most of those who like to spout the term "critical thinking" are leftwing libtards. They use it when others disagree with them. It was the cool phrase before "follow the science."

I dare say, those who like to use the term "critical thinking" are the true sheep. They did not "critical think" about all possibilities. They dismiss the possibility of different conclusions outright. Those who dismiss alternative ideas or explanations about a scientific idea are ignorant at best, and intellectually dishonest at worst.

I find it hard not to note that not even Mike Adams claims that the incidence of SADS has been increasing since December 2020, which is when the COVID-19 vaccines first rolled out. Wouldn’t you think that such an observation, at the very minimum, would be the prerequisite for even speculating that COVID-19 vaccines might be causing SADS?

Hmmm, explain since you are such an expert in "critical thinking". Or is using logic to objectively analyze an argument "too liberal"?

If being "conservative" means unquestioningly accepting any evidence free narrative vomited up to feed your confirmation bias, then I guess I'm not "conservative".

[LBDamned]

^^^ the left does their 'critical thinking' by studying MSM...

but you're right - 'critical thinking' shouldn't need a book.