Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Hydroxychloroquine RCT Study Published in The British Medical Journal shows no effect

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • balgor
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 1553

    Hydroxychloroquine RCT Study Published in The British Medical Journal shows no effect



    Conclusions Administration of hydroxychloroquine did not result in a significantly higher probability of negative conversion than standard of care alone in patients admitted to hospital with mainly persistent mild to moderate covid-19. Adverse events were higher in hydroxychloroquine recipients than in non-recipients.

    Small sample, but an actual RCT and published in the BMJ a peer reviewed top flight journal. We can't say for certain that Hydroxychloroquine is useless or useful, but the evidence is coalescing around the useless outcome. There are more RCTs coming out soon, so we'll see. I'm keeping an open mind. I don't care if a drug is being touted by Kim Jong Il, if an RCT shows its effective against Covid-19 I'm all for mass usage.

    Come on Minnesota, publish this study, estimated completion date was May, 14th:


    FYI on RCTs:
    Last edited by balgor; 05-15-2020, 1:17 PM.
    Critical Thinking Skills:
    Learn how to examine your sources and check for fake news or misleading facts.
    https://libguides.royalroads.ca/criticalthinking
  • #2
    SAN compnerd
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor
    CGN Contributor
    • May 2009
    • 4725

    Originally posted by balgor
    https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj....campaign=usage

    Conclusions Administration of hydroxychloroquine did not result in a significantly higher probability of negative conversion than standard of care alone in patients admitted to hospital with mainly persistent mild to moderate covid-19. Adverse events were higher in hydroxychloroquine recipients than in non-recipients.

    Small sample, but an actual RCT and published in the BMJ a peer reviewed top flight journal. We can't say for certain that Hydroxychloroquine is useless or useful, but the evidence is coalescing around the useless outcome. There are more RCTs coming out soon, so we'll see. I'm keeping an open mind. I don't care if a drug is being touted by Kim Jong Il, if an RCT shows its effective against Covid-19 I'm all for mass usage.

    Come on Minnesota, publish this study, estimated completion date was May, 14th:


    FYI on RCTs:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6235704/
    Study performed in China is Chinese propaganda. Worthless even with the Brit's seal of approval. Also of note is there is lots of solid science saying that erythromycin and or zinc is key to efficacy.
    "I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious." - Thomas Jefferson, 1824

    Originally posted by SAN compnerd
    When the middle east descends into complete chaos in 2-3 years due in part to the actions of this administration I'll necro post about how clueless I was.

    Comment

    • #3
      cleonard
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 958

      I'd like to see a study where the treatment was started closer to the onset of symptoms. In this one the average delay was 16 days. Most of the positive anecdotal reports were from patients with less delay before treatment.

      There are other viral treatments that only work when given early. A prime example it Tamiflu. It really only helps if given within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms. It does little for someone who gets flu complications and ends up in the hospital with pneumonia. The time for it to help the patient has passed by then. I know that the flu is completely different, but I wonder if the same kind of "it only works if given promptly" applies to Covid and HCQ.

      The other issue is that this was a Chinese study and not everyone has a lot of trust with the Chinese government these days.

      There are a lot of other trials going on. HCQ is not the only existing drug being tested. There are several others that showed in vitro promise. I sure hope that at least one of them turns out to be a viable treatment. I don't root for one drug over another. HCQ has just received more press coverage.
      I'm just rooting for at least one to show positive results in a controlled trial.

      Having an effective or at least partially effective treatment would help a lot.

      Comment

      • #4
        Den60
        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
        CGN Contributor
        • Jul 2016
        • 2695

        Seems to be a study aimed at attacking President Trump. China isn't liking him right now. As I understand the HCQ issue it needs to be used in combination with Z-pac and zinc in order to be effective. Someone posted something from a college in VA that did some research and even came up with a combination of things like Vitamin C, Zinc, and other things that may have some effectiveness as a prophylactic as well as a therapeutic. I have been following that recommendation. Can't hurt.


        Mojave Lever Crew Member

        "It is time for us to do what we have been doing and that time is every day. Every day it is time for us to agree that there are things and tools that are available to us to slow this thing down." - Kamala "Heels Up" Harris

        Comment

        • #5
          kelvin232
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2013
          • 827

          Title is misleading. It wasn't 'no effect'... It shows NEGATIVE effect.

          Comment

          • #6
            Funbaby
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2009
            • 1879

            But Dear Leader said it was a gift from god.

            Dear Leader is infallible.

            Comment

            • #7
              seal20
              Veteran Member
              • Nov 2008
              • 3081

              You guys don't even read the articles you praise as fitting your agenda...

              What a bunch of WEAK TRUCKS

              Comment

              • #8
                AlienHobo
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2016
                • 695

                Posted up today.

                Comment

                • #9
                  CaliforniaCowboy
                  Senior Member
                  • May 2015
                  • 1469

                  From what I read, in yet another study and no I do not have the link as I do not remember where I read it.

                  The effectivness of HCH was very slight or not helpful at all in patients that were already exibiting serious complications, thus those that had to be admitted to a stay in the hospital. But that the drug was very effective in those that had not yet gotten to that point. So the drug seems to be effective if you can get it to the patient before the virus progresses too far. So it would be something you would want to prescribe to those that have tested positive with mild early symptoms.

                  Many of the studies on the drug were being done on people in bad shape already, So they would give some people with severe symptoms the drug and some with severe symptoms did not get the drug. So you would not see any real difference in outcomes as the drug is not effective if not given before a patient gets to that severity to begin with.
                  https://thedeplorablepatriot.com/

                  "A Holocaust survivor dies of old age, when he gets to heaven he tells God a Holocaust joke. God says, That isn't funny. The Old man tells God, well, I guess you had to be there."

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    CaliforniaCowboy
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2015
                    • 1469

                    Originally posted by Funbaby
                    But Dear Leader said it was a gift from god.

                    Dear Leader is infallible.
                    Dear Leader is not coming up with that info on his own, he is relaying what the so called "Scientific Experts" are reporting to him.
                    https://thedeplorablepatriot.com/

                    "A Holocaust survivor dies of old age, when he gets to heaven he tells God a Holocaust joke. God says, That isn't funny. The Old man tells God, well, I guess you had to be there."

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      balgor
                      Senior Member
                      • Apr 2011
                      • 1553

                      Originally posted by CaliforniaCowboy
                      Dear Leader is not coming up with that info on his own, he is relaying what the so called "Scientific Experts" are reporting to him.
                      The whitehouse pulled the info on HCQ directly from Fox news, who pulled it from the random french doctor. The general consensus amongst the actual scientific community on HCQ was that the effects on Covid-19 were unknown, no where near worth the Trumpian hype, and HCQ had well known mild toxicities.
                      Critical Thinking Skills:
                      Learn how to examine your sources and check for fake news or misleading facts.
                      https://libguides.royalroads.ca/criticalthinking

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        sigstroker
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Jan 2009
                        • 19485

                        Tell that to Michigan state Rep. Karen Whitsett.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        UA-8071174-1