Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Fixed vs. Variable Power

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 00BuckShot
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2009
    • 532

    Fixed vs. Variable Power

    I've been going back and forth on which scope to get for my AR build. It's a varmint 16" bull barrel build and I'm not going for any long distance (past maybe 200yards) shots. I'm debating between a 3-9x42 or a fixed 4x32. Any thoughts? Only $40 difference in scope prices so money's not a concern.
    -jeremy
    sigpic
  • #2
    Fjold
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Oct 2005
    • 22943

    I always pick variable, sometimes you want more magnification and with a variable you get it. With a 16" bull barrel you're not worried about a couple of ounces of scope weight and the recoil of the 223 sure isn't going to put any strain on the scope and with the reliability of modern scopes I don't worry about them.
    Frank

    One rifle, one planet, Holland's 375




    Life Member NRA, CRPA and SAF

    Comment

    • #3
      ronas
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 758

      I'm considering getting a fixed power scope too. I will be using it mostly for target shooting from 100 to 300 yards. It will go on AR15 and Remington 700 P.

      Since looking the best scope for the money, that I've been able to find is the 10x37 US Optics scope.

      A number of the people who target shoot at my gun club have these variable power scopes but they alway have them at the high magnification anyways. So I figure I can get a really nice fixed power scope for much much less than a comparable quality variable.

      Comment

      Working...
      UA-8071174-1