Single Action Revolver Reproduction Qualify as CR

[DerZilla]

Hi

I think i know the answer to this question, but figures just to ask and see. I was wondering if a reproduction of single action revolver, Like a Colt 1873, qualifies as a CR. I know that it will have to be DROS, but I have a CR and COE and was wondering if I can skip the ten day wait?

[Quiet]

Hi

I think i know the answer to this question, but figures just to ask and see. I was wondering if a reproduction of single action revolver, Like a Colt 1873, qualifies as a CR. I know that it will have to be DROS, but I have a CR and COE and was wondering if I can skip the ten day wait?

Reproductions are not C&R.
Unless, they were made 50 or more years ago.

[Grendl]

Reproductions are not C&R.
Unless, they were made 50 or more years ago.

Or are specifically listed in ATF's list of Curio and Relics like certain commemorative firearms. There are several Colt and S&W models listed that were manufactured more recently for example.

[DerZilla]

Thanks for the reply. Thats exactly what I was thinking. Looks like will will have to find a old one so that I can avoid the ten day wait. Im spoiled now

[CSACANNONEER]

Or are specifically listed in ATF's list of Curio and Relics like certain commemorative firearms. There are several Colt and S&W models listed that were manufactured more recently for example.

Federally, this is correct. In Ca, it still has to be over 50 years old although, it's a moot point because, a C&R handgun still needs to go through an 01 or 07FFL in CA.

[Grendl]

But with an FFL03 and COE you can skip the 10 days wait on a C&R pistol. That was his original question.

[Mssr. Eleganté]

Federally, this is correct. In Ca, it still has to be over 50 years old...

I really thought after AB 809 became law people would stop spouting this nonsense. California uses the exact same definition of C&R as the feds. They always have. And since AB 809 became law the language in the penal code that used to confuse people is gone.

[BigJ]

Federally, this is correct. In Ca, it still has to be over 50 years old although...

Just double checking myself but that is still true? After Jan 1 2014 the 50 year requirement is no longer in an issue here in California, correct?

[Mssr. Eleganté]

It's never been true.

[BigJ]

It's never been true.

Indeed. Sorry. I should have been more clear as you were. Thanks.

[CSACANNONEER]

I stand corrected.