Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

What current centerfire semi-auto rifles could still be sold if SB 374 isn't vetoed?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ChuckW
    Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 296

    What current centerfire semi-auto rifles could still be sold if SB 374 isn't vetoed?

    I'm wondering about rifles that are currently manufactured. The SKSs and Garands haven't be manufactured for decades. Are there even any fixed magazine semiautos made these days?

    There probably will be, considering we're around 10% of the nation's population.
  • #2
    stix213
    AKA: Joe Censored
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Apr 2009
    • 18998

    I believe Springfield makes brand new Garands....

    Comment

    • #3
      IPSICK
      Veteran Member
      • Nov 2005
      • 4259

      ARs/AKs
      "When you get the (men) to the range, you just get the men. But when you bring the (women) to the range, you get the (whole family). And that's what's going to save our 2nd Amendment."--Dianna Liedorff

      "Since self-preservation is the 1st law of nature, we assert the...right to self-defense. The Constitution...clearly affirms the right of every American...to bear arms. And as Americans, we will not give up a single right guaranteed under the Constitution." --Malcolm X

      Comment

      • #4
        Nrai2020
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2013
        • 2341

        ARs will likely still be sold IMO... there are just too many ways around SB374... the trick would be finding a shop that wont be too scared to transfer or sell them.. I think 5 or 6 months into the year gun shops will start selling again once they get over their fear of the new laws..

        Comment

        • #5
          IPSICK
          Veteran Member
          • Nov 2005
          • 4259

          The only thing I can think of is not necessarily related to SB 374 but more related to AB 500 and the new proposed DOJ regs regarding DROS delays. I can see someone trying to purchase an AR/AK receiver and DOJ doing an infinite delay due to someone "attempting" to violate the statute resulting from SB 374.
          "When you get the (men) to the range, you just get the men. But when you bring the (women) to the range, you get the (whole family). And that's what's going to save our 2nd Amendment."--Dianna Liedorff

          "Since self-preservation is the 1st law of nature, we assert the...right to self-defense. The Constitution...clearly affirms the right of every American...to bear arms. And as Americans, we will not give up a single right guaranteed under the Constitution." --Malcolm X

          Comment

          • #6
            RobGR
            Veteran Member
            • May 2010
            • 2880

            Originally posted by IPSICK
            The only thing I can think of is not necessarily related to SB 374 but more related to AB 500 and the new proposed DOJ regs regarding DROS delays. I can see someone trying to purchase an AR/AK receiver and DOJ doing an infinite delay due to someone "attempting" to violate the statute resulting from SB 374.
            It's what they did in South Africa in 2005 (around there), endless delays in getting a license for your firearm. 5 out of a 1,000 applicants were being approved a month at one store. They could pull some BS like that.

            "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks & corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."

            KrisAnne Hall on Oregon

            "I am sullied - no more" Col. Ted Westhusing

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1