Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Scope base question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jtv3062
    replied
    Originally posted by LynnJr
    We use beer and soda cans but they are not very thick. This requires quite a few shims to get any slope.
    Burris sells clear plastic shims that you can get in different thicknesses. I tend to get the thickest ones they make. They come in packets of 10-20 shims and are very cheap.
    You shim the bases to get "slope"? You're going to bend your scope doing this. The stupid gunsmith did that to a scope I bought second hand and that's what I now have. I only discovered the bent tube after I removed the rings that came with the scope. The gunsmith used his business card as a shim.

    Leave a comment:


  • LynnJr
    replied
    We use beer and soda cans but they are not very thick. This requires quite a few shims to get any slope.
    Burris sells clear plastic shims that you can get in different thicknesses. I tend to get the thickest ones they make. They come in packets of 10-20 shims and are very cheap.

    Leave a comment:


  • Horrendo Revolver
    replied
    Never measured them. I've got a big stash of shims Leupold sent me when I mounted scopes at Cabela's. Before that I had a stash of homemade shims. Some were from beer cans and some were from soda cans. Beer cans are thicker so that gives you two thicknesses of shims to work with.

    Leave a comment:


  • jrpowell3
    replied
    Originally posted by Horrendo Revolver
    I shim bases if elevation adjustment is needed. You can make them out of beer cans.
    I have plenty of those....how thick are beer cans?

    Leave a comment:


  • Horrendo Revolver
    replied
    I shim bases if elevation adjustment is needed. You can make them out of beer cans.

    Leave a comment:


  • jrpowell3
    replied
    So, new question regarding bedding the scope base.

    Are the shim kits any good or should I just do the JB Weld thing shown in one of the videos above?

    Leave a comment:


  • jrpowell3
    replied
    I used the site MEGSDAD posted, and I should have approximately 3/8" of an inch clearance between the objective bell and the barrel(including the scope cover) using .823" rings(Badger Ordnance Standard Height).

    Leave a comment:


  • jtv3062
    replied
    Another easy way to figure out what height rings you need is to stack pennies on you rail front and back until the bell is no longer touching the barrel. Measure the the stack of pennies and add half of the diameter of the scope tube.

    Leave a comment:


  • jrpowell3
    replied
    That's good knowledge. Looks like I can go smaller than the 1.03" rings.

    Leave a comment:


  • MEGSDAD
    replied
    This might help.

    Leave a comment:


  • jrpowell3
    replied
    If the wide end of the scope is 2.03" wide, what height rings should I go for? I'm looking at 1.125" height rings, but I can also get 1.03" rings, but I'm not certain.

    Leave a comment:


  • LynnJr
    replied
    Originally posted by kevins750
    I haven't noticed that before, I was always in the mindset anything touching the barrel could have negative effects. Learn something everyday.
    Here is a picture of a mirage shield on my 1000 yard 6 Dasher and next to it is the bottom of another shield showing the Velcro dots that hold in place on the barrel.
    If you look at the muzzle you will see a Hoehn/Harrell's tuner which weighs 8.5 ounces as you see it. Any time you add weight to the muzzle you are dampening the height of the barrels whip which broadens the tuning window. Adding a heavy front sight or a heavy muzzlebrake may affect your previous load but it takes about 4 ounces on a #17 contour or larger barrel to produce recognizable results. If you go past 14 ounces you will find accuracy affected in a negative way because the barrel will be pointing on a downward slant when the bullet leaves the muzzle.
    If you look at my earlier post the gun sporting the polished aluminum stock has a tuner weighing more than 3 pounds but the barrel is 1.450 straight cylinder.
    Last edited by LynnJr; 12-25-2016, 8:28 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • JMP
    replied
    Originally posted by jrpowell3
    The reason I'm asking is because, from my time in the marine corps, my shooting posture has definitely molded itself to the higher up sights of the m16, so I noticed when I was holding some bolt guns the other day that when I shouldered the weapon, my line of sight was not parallel to the barrel.

    I think I might have to adjust my posture to adapt to the different sight level.
    I'd go with what's comfortable for you. Generally, long distance shooters will have high bore height since there may be a large cant in the base, avoids mirage from the barrel, and you don't lose that much if your targets are all far. Tactical shooters will want minimal bore height as they shoot at all ranges and high scopes can be a bit goofy for short and intermediate ranges.

    Leave a comment:


  • jrpowell3
    replied
    Originally posted by ar15barrels
    When the gun weighs 60-100lbs and sits on a mechanical return-to-battery rest, there is no need to touch anything but the trigger.
    When you shoot a gun like that, they stock is shaped differently.

    When you shoot a gun with your head on the stock, you want the scope as close to the barrel as possible.
    That weighs the same as a M2HB with the tripod... So, I think medium rings for the scope I got it'll give me about an 1/8" clearance from the bottom of the scope to the bottom of the ring, depending on the model

    Leave a comment:


  • ar15barrels
    replied
    Originally posted by jrpowell3
    No stock weld? Interesting. But I guess with a scope all you need is proper eye relief and no scope shadow
    When the gun weighs 60-100lbs and sits on a mechanical return-to-battery rest, there is no need to touch anything but the trigger.
    When you shoot a gun like that, they stock is shaped differently.

    When you shoot a gun with your head on the stock, you want the scope as close to the barrel as possible.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
UA-8071174-1