6-inch or 4-inch

[Barbarosa]

I've got revolvers of various sizes from 1 7/8" up to 12". I find the 3 - 4" the most comfortable, well balanced. A lot depends on what loads you shoot; heaver loads will feel better with the longer barrel. For my $.02 go with the 4".

[nikki#2]

Nice read, thanks.

I failed to mention I like the idea of added velocity from a longer barrel, not just perceived accuracy. Physics tells us that force = mass x velocity,
therefore added velocity should mean a 'harder' hit. It could make a difference if defending yourself in the wilderness.

Well, here's the publisher of that same site demonstrating something else that could make a difference if defending yourself in the wilderness."

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2011/01/robert-farago/revolvers-can-fail-smith-wesson-performance-center-686-locks-up/

[Sabesimpson]

I believe the 6" is the way to go. I have a 686+ and the accuracy is great for a mini hand cannon

[Saym14]

I vote 6 inches over 4 since u mention your wife using it

[JTROKS]

5" GP100???

It's not a regular production run, It's a Davidson's exclusive.

http://rugerforum.net/ruger-double-action/70507-gp100-5-a.html

[huntndog]

Well, here's the publisher of that same site demonstrating something else that could make a difference if defending yourself in the wilderness."

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2011/01/robert-farago/revolvers-can-fail-smith-wesson-performance-center-686-locks-up/

Of course, have heard the rumors... But have never actually seen the Lock malfunction and lock the gun up on video...
Then be verified by a gunsmith.

OP, understanding the purpose of the gun, suggest the options on your poll should be changed to:

- S&W 686 'no-lock' 4" barrel

or

- S&W 686 'no-lock' 6" barrel

[Richochet]

Size is not important!

As Dr. Ruth said, "Size is not important, it's how you use it!"

[MotoriousRacing]

Busy today at work, but I hope to post tonight. Thanks for the advice.

[hk200085]

For me, it is the 4 inch that feels like a natural extension of my arm, but then again that is just my personal preference. YMMV.

[Poohgyrr]

I'm gonna revist this thread after I've been to On-Target and shot a few different .357 revolvers. I'm going to try to go next week.

You mentioned wanting your wife to be able to handle this gun, you might take her along as well. The 6"er may be too heavy for her.

[Tacticali]

How about a 3 inch like the Wiley Clapp Gp 100. I don't think any bad guy has ever questioned the barrel length of the 357 that stopped him in his tracks.

[Army GI]

I would definitely go with the 4" GP100.

Ive owned the 4" and 6" GP100 and I've fired a buddies 6" S&W 357. I can honestly say that if you like finely made weapons, go with the S&W, there is no comparison.

Then again, if you want an ultra rugged gun, go with the Ruger.

The first GP100 I bought was the 6" and I hated it. The balances was all off and it just felt like a range toy. I sold it the first chance I got. The 4" has perfect balance and I could easily hit a torso-sized target with it at 25-50 yards if I did my part.

[jakejake527]

3" 686+


THREAD CLOSED

[Black Majik]

Overall I feel like 4" provides the best balance and weight. Its still long enough to get good accuracy without feeling to front heavy.

Since half or full lug plays a difference, I also prefer half lug revolvers. Full lug revolvers really throws off the weight distribution.

[calibased]

5 inch