Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contra Costa
Collapse
X
-
-
The Sheriff’s CCW information page now says Walnut Creek residents are to apply with WC police and has an embedded link. Unfortunately the linked page only has general information about WCPD so best to call for information. The chatbot was no help.
Last edited by Paladin; 09-02-2025, 10:50 PM.Comment
-
A month and a half later and the WCPD still has this note on their web site:The Sheriff’s CCW information page now says Walnut Creek residents are to apply with WC police and has an embedded link. Unfortunately the linked page only has general information about WCPD so best to call for information. The chatbot was no help.
https://www.walnutcreekpdca.gov/home-policenew
**Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) Permit Notice**
The Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office (CCCSO) previously processed CCW permit applications for Walnut Creek residents. Moving forward, the Walnut Creek Police Department (WCPD) will now handle all CCW applications for city residents.
WCPD is in the process of developing an online application system to make this transition as smooth as possible. We appreciate your patience as we update our website with detailed instructions and application links in the near future.
Please check back soon for updates regarding the new WCPD CCW permit application process.
Comment
-
San Ramon finally moved their application process online:Has anyone recently been issued a CCW from the San Ramon Police Department? What was the process for applying? The only information available on the City of San Ramon website was directions to email the PD for additional information. I have done so but have not received a reply.
My situation is that I have a CCW from the Contra Costa Sheriff's Office expiring in September. I've heard that San Ramon allows red dot sights and if that is true I would like to renew my CCW through San Ramon if that is possible. If I need to apply as a new applicant it may not be worth the effort depending upon what is required.
Thanks in advance for any responses,
D.
Comment
-
3 months later. Still the same. How is this ok?
A month and a half later and the WCPD still has this note on their web site:
Comment
-
Which CoCo City PDs are requiring psych tests for new applicants? Pleasant Hill is, and it's the same test that officer candidates have to take. The test is 4+ hours long and costs $415. Curious how that compares to other cities as I have not read of others having to jump through that hoop.Comment
-
At long last WCPD finally put their CCW application process online:
Comment
-
Has anyone one gone through the Martinez Police Dept to get a CCW? I can't go through the Sheriff anymore.
The weapon requirements for Martinez are so vague as to be useless.
How strict is Martinez on references and psych testing?
It's almost not worth going through all that sh-t again. It took 17 months to get my CCW through the Sheriff's office.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
JoeComment
-
I am surprised that nobody has mentioned the recent lawsuit by the Second Amendment Foundation against Contra Costa County. (Or, perhaps there is a post and I missed it. Sorry if this is duplicative.)
In any case, on June 17, 2026, the SAF filed the action.
According to the complaint:
"1. This action challenges the concealed carry weapon (“CCW”) permit issuance policies and practices of the Defendants that prohibit CCW applicants and those issued valid CCW permits from including and attaching popular, safety¬ enhancing attachments on the handguns they legally carry for self-defense as part of the CCW permit. Specifically, Defendants’ policies and practices prohibit the attachment and use of red dot sights and flashlights on CCW firearms. Additionally, Defendants outright ban the carry of Single Action Only (SAO) firearms, including, by name, 1911 platform (“1911-Style”) handguns, which are themselves quite popular. These policies violate the Second Amendment under the standard set forth in New York State Rifle & Pistol ***'n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022) and are thus unconstitutional."
Comment
-
If they do win, CoCoCo will allow it, but each enhancement to your firearm will be an additional 8 hour class and range qual. Red Dot: +8 hours. WML: +8 hours. 1911: +8 hours. Oh, and don't forget the additional fees, levy's, admin costs and licenses for each.I am surprised that nobody has mentioned the recent lawsuit by the Second Amendment Foundation against Contra Costa County. (Or, perhaps there is a post and I missed it. Sorry if this is duplicative.)
In any case, on June 17, 2026, the SAF filed the action.
According to the complaint:
"1. This action challenges the concealed carry weapon (“CCW”) permit issuance policies and practices of the Defendants that prohibit CCW applicants and those issued valid CCW permits from including and attaching popular, safety¬ enhancing attachments on the handguns they legally carry for self-defense as part of the CCW permit. Specifically, Defendants’ policies and practices prohibit the attachment and use of red dot sights and flashlights on CCW firearms. Additionally, Defendants outright ban the carry of Single Action Only (SAO) firearms, including, by name, 1911 platform (“1911-Style”) handguns, which are themselves quite popular. These policies violate the Second Amendment under the standard set forth in New York State Rifle & Pistol ***'n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022) and are thus unconstitutional."Les Baer 1911: Premier II w/1.5" Guarantee, Blued, No FCS, Combat Rear, F/O Front, Checkered MSH & SA Professional Double Diamond Grips
Springfield Armory XD-45 4" Service Model
Springfield Armory XD9 4" Service Model (wifes).
M&P 15 (Mine)Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,867,149
Posts: 25,153,992
Members: 357,208
Active Members: 4,727
Welcome to our newest member, muddywatters.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 24925 users online. 84 members and 24841 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment