![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() This is the thread. Please ask here. Read the whole thread - at this point, it is unlikely that your question is really any different from an existing question. UPDATE Dec 10, 2018 - clearly this is still needed. Remember, cite ONLY the Penal Code as it exists - the bills and the proposition language interacted in 'interesting' ways, and the actual Penal Code is the result of all the interactions. ------------------- Here is the Penal Code in question, governing NON-FFLs - http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa...r=1.&article=2. Quote:
And http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa...r=1.&article=4. Quote:
__________________
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."Ann Althouse: “Begin with the hypothesis that what they did is what they wanted to do. If they postured that they wanted to do something else, regard that as a con. Work from there. The world will make much more sense.” Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs. ![]() Last edited by Librarian; 12-11-2018 at 11:22 AM.. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's the Penal Code for FFLs/Ammunition vendors: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/fa...r=1.&article=3.
A selection from those sections: Quote:
Quote:
Thanks to Thorium and a couple others for the link.
__________________
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."Ann Althouse: “Begin with the hypothesis that what they did is what they wanted to do. If they postured that they wanted to do something else, regard that as a con. Work from there. The world will make much more sense.” Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs. ![]() Last edited by Librarian; 01-06-2018 at 12:35 PM.. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() § 4302. Standard Ammunition Eligibility Check (AFS Match). (a) A purchaser or transferee is authorized to purchase ammunition if their information matches an entry in the Automated Firearm System and does not match an entry in the Prohibited Armed Persons File. (1) A purchaser or transferee may request, through an ammunition vendor, that the Department conduct a Standard Ammunition Eligibility Check to determine if the ammunition purchaser or transferee qualifies for this authorization. (b) As authorized by Penal Code section 30370, subdivision (e), the fee for a Standard Ammunition Eligibility Check is $1.00. (c) The ammunition vendor shall collect the purchaser's or transferee's name, date of birth, current address, and driver's license or other government identification number in the manner described in Penal Code section 28180, and telephone number, and enter this information into the DES website. (d) Upon the Department's completion of the Standard Ammunition Eligibility Check, the Department shall update the purchaser's or transferee's DES record to instruct the ammunition vendor to approve or reject the purchase or transfer. (e) If the purchase or transfer is rejected, the ammunition vendor shall provide the purchaser or transferee with an ATN that can be used to obtain the reason for the rejection through the Department's CFARS website. § 4303. Basic Ammunition Eligibility Check (Single Transaction or Purchase). (a) A purchaser or transferee is authorized to purchase ammunition if they are not prohibited from purchasing or possessing ammunition, subsequent to affirmation by the Department. (1) A purchaser or transferee may request, through an ammunition vendor, that the Department conduct a Basic Ammunition Eligibility Check to determine if the purchaser or transferee qualifies for this authorization. (2) A purchaser or transferee may instead seek authorization by following the procedure set forth by section 4302, 4304, 4305, or 4306, as applicable. (b) As authorized by Penal Code section 30370, subdivision (c), the fee for a Basic Ammunition Eligibility Check is $19.00. (c) The ammunition vendor shall collect the ammunition purchaser's or transferee's name, date of birth, current address, gender, hair color, eye color, height, weight, and driver's license or other government identification number in the manner described in Penal Code section 28180, and telephone number, United States citizenship status, federal Alien Registration Number or I-94 (if applicable), place of birth, alias name(s), and race, and enter this information into the DES website. (d) The ammunition vendor will provide the purchaser or transferee an ATN to monitor the status of the Basic Ammunition Eligibility Check through the Department's CFARS website. (1) An approved Basic Ammunition Eligibility Check can only be used for one ammunition purchase or transfer, and the approval expires 30 calendar days from when it is issued. (2) If the Basic Ammunition Eligibility Check is denied, the Department shall notify the purchaser or transferee of the reason for the denial via U.S. Mail. (e) Upon the Department's completion of a Basic Ammunition Eligibility Check, the Department shall update the purchaser's or transferee's DES record. § 4305. COE Verification Process. (a) A purchaser or transferee is authorized to purchase ammunition if they hold a current Certificate of Eligibility, subsequent to verification by the Department. (1) A purchaser or transferee may request, through an ammunition vendor, that the Department conduct a COE Verification to determine if the purchaser or transferee qualifies for this authorization. (b) As authorized by Penal Code section 30370, subdivision (e), the fee for COE Verification is $1.00. (c) The ammunition vendor shall collect the ammunition purchaser's or transferee's name, date of birth, current address, and driver's license or other government identification number in the manner described in Penal Code section 28180, telephone number, and COE number, and enter the information into the DES website. (d) Upon the Department's completion of the COE Verification, the Department shall update the purchaser's or transferee's DES record to instruct the ammunition vendor to approve or reject the ammunition purchase or transfer.
__________________
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."Ann Althouse: “Begin with the hypothesis that what they did is what they wanted to do. If they postured that they wanted to do something else, regard that as a con. Work from there. The world will make much more sense.” Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs. ![]() Last edited by Librarian; 08-31-2019 at 2:29 PM.. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So July 2019 vendors can sell only to someone with a residence and phone number?
Looks like PPT (transfers between non-vendors) other than sales are OK face to face but not requiring vendor? Last edited by YubaRiver; 01-03-2018 at 3:20 PM.. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So what exactly does this mean? I'm not a lawyer nor am I familiar with law practice but this to me sounds like it's okay to transport ammunition into California if it was acquired from a immediate family member? Below I have included the penal code section from which I interpreted.
CHAPTER 1. Ammunition [30210 - 30395] ( Chapter 1 added by Stats. 2010, Ch. 711, Sec. 6. ) ARTICLE 2. Other Restrictions Relating to Ammunition [30300 - 30340] ( Article 2 added by Stats. 2010, Ch. 711, Sec. 6. ) 30314. (a) Commencing January 1, 2018, a resident of this state shall not bring or transport into this state any ammunition that he or she purchased or otherwise obtained from outside of this state unless he or she first has that ammunition delivered to a licensed ammunition vendor for delivery to that resident pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 30312. (b) Subdivision (a) does not apply to any of the following: (1) An ammunition vendor. (2) A sworn peace officer, as defined in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2, or sworn federal law enforcement officer, who is authorized to carry a firearm in the course and scope of the officer’s duties. (3) An importer or manufacturer of ammunition or firearms who is licensed to engage in business pursuant to Chapter 44 (commencing with Section 921) of Title 18 of the United States Code and the regulations issued pursuant thereto. (4) A person who is on the centralized list of exempted federal firearms licensees maintained by the Department of Justice pursuant to Article 6 (commencing with Section 28450) of Chapter 6 of Division 6. (5) A person who is licensed as a collector of firearms pursuant to Chapter 44 (commencing with Section 921) of Title 18 of the United States Code and the regulations issued pursuant thereto, whose licensed premises are within this state, and who has a current certificate of eligibility issued by the Department of Justice pursuant to Section 26710. (6) A person who acquired the ammunition from a spouse, registered domestic partner, or immediate family member as defined in Section 16720. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I were to drive to Vegas for a trip, I can return with 50 rounds of ammunition / person legally? I couldn't find the exact law but remember reading that even if I "brought" the ammo originally from CA, I can only return with 50 rounds.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
(a) Commencing January 1, 2018, a resident of this state shall not bring or transport into this state any ammunition that he or she purchased or otherwise obtained from outside of this state unless he or she first has that ammunition delivered to a licensed ammunition vendor for delivery to that resident pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 30312. Your answer is hidden somewhere in the bolded text.
__________________
Quote:
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That 50 round thing was in a bill written in the legislature. Prop 63 over wrote that. You cannot bring ANY ammo back into the state purchased out of state. You can buy it out of state but it must be shipped to a licensed ammo dealer for the actual physical transfer.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
You can bring it back with you.
__________________
"Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth." George Washington "The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed." Thomas Jefferson |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
...transport exception from spouse/direct family include driven and shipped? If so, burden of proof is easier using the later method I would assume. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And even if they can, it's an infraction for the first offense. It is virtually impossible for them to enforce this unless you blurt out "I bought it in Nevada!"
__________________
Quote:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am planning a bird hunting trip to CA next month. I live in Reno (having fled the insanity of California a few years back). Can I bring my own shotgun shells with me provided I don't transfer them to anyone else?
Thanks |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes. The new laws only apply to a resident of California or an ammunition vendor. Nor would you be an ammunition vendor if you were to sell a few shells to your hunting buds (not more than 500 sold in a 30 day period).
Quote:
Last edited by Chewy65; 01-04-2018 at 2:22 PM.. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
so then what is to stop residents of other states to bring in thousands of rounds of ammo when they cross the border to visit friends & family?and would i as a CA resident be breaking this law for accepting it without going through a FFL?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If I bought ammo in NV in 1972 and brought it to CA then, can I take it back to NV and then re import it to CA without having to go through a LAV?
I don't see anything in the law that exempts ammo that was in CA prior to 1-1-18 just ammunition that was purchased in CA at any point in time.
__________________
NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun and Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor California DOJ Certified Fingerprint Roller Ventura County approved CCW Instructor Utah CCW Instructor Offering low cost multi state CCW, private basic shooting and reloading classes for calgunners. ![]() KM6WLV |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
30312. (a) (1) Commencing January 1, 2018, the sale of ammunition by any party shall be conducted by or processed through a licensed ammunition vendor. (2) When neither party to an ammunition sale is a licensed ammunition vendor, the seller shall deliver the ammunition to a vendor to process the transaction. The ammunition vendor shall promptly and properly deliver the ammunition to the purchaser, if the sale is not prohibited, as if the ammunition were the vendor’s own merchandise. If the ammunition vendor cannot legally deliver the ammunition to the purchaser, the vendor shall forthwith return the ammunition to the seller. The ammunition vendor may charge the purchaser an administrative fee to process the transaction, in an amount to be set by the Department of Justice, in addition to any applicable fees that may be charged pursuant to the provisions of this title. (b) Commencing January 1, 2018, the sale, delivery, or transfer of ownership of ammunition by any party may only occur in a face-to-face transaction with the seller, deliverer, or transferor, provided, however, that ammunition may be purchased or acquired over the Internet or through other means of remote ordering if a licensed ammunition vendor initially receives the ammunition and processes the transaction in compliance with this section and Article 3 (commencing with Section 30342) of Chapter 1 of Division 10 of Title 4 of this part. Well, (a) would not apply to a gift since, the law clearly only says "sale". Now, (b) does include "sale", "delivery" and "transfer" so, it would apply to a gift. While it does include "transforor", it does not appear to require a "transferor" to be present or included in the exchange because, the law was written with the word "OR" instead of "and". Also, (b) is a stand alone clause and does not include the requirement to go through a LAV like (a) does. I know what CA DOJ would say but, is it legal even if they don't want it to be? It might be.
__________________
NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun and Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor California DOJ Certified Fingerprint Roller Ventura County approved CCW Instructor Utah CCW Instructor Offering low cost multi state CCW, private basic shooting and reloading classes for calgunners. ![]() KM6WLV |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Didn't see this posted yet...
What is "an immediate family member" for the purposes of this new law? Quote:
__________________
Regarding the 2nd Amendment: "...to disarm the people ― that was the best and most effectual way to enslave them." George Mason ("The Father of the Bill of Rights") Regarding Life and Death: "Do not fear those who kill the body but are unable to kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell." Matthew 10:28 The BIG question: "What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ?" Matthew 27:22b |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth." George Washington "The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed." Thomas Jefferson |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But starting in 2019 the law completely exempts an out of sate resident: Senate Bill No. 1235 30368. (a) Commencing July 1, 2019, a resident of this state shall not bring or transport into this state any ammunition that he or she purchased from outside of this state unless he or she first has that ammunition delivered to an ammunition vendor in this state for delivery to that resident pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 30366. (b) Subdivision (a) does not apply to any of the following bringing or transporting into this state any ammunition: (13) A person that at the time he or she acquired the ammunition was not a resident of this state. Am I interpreting the law wrong? I know it's not till next year, but it's relative to this discussion. Link to the bill: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/f...01520160SB1235 |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
PC30368 was part of Section 14 of SB1235. Section 14 of SB1235 did not become effective because Prop 63 passed.
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So Prop 63 supercedes the law Gov. Moon Beam actually signed?
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1264635
__________________
"Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth." George Washington "The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed." Thomas Jefferson |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."Ann Althouse: “Begin with the hypothesis that what they did is what they wanted to do. If they postured that they wanted to do something else, regard that as a con. Work from there. The world will make much more sense.” Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs. ![]() |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skimming through the new CA ammunition restrictions, it appears that most of the law is applied to what a CA Resident may or may not do.
I'm wondering, as a non-resident of CA, am I free to bring in my own ammo for personal use from out of state by air or car? If so, are there any restrictions on quantity of rounds or lead composition I can bring in? (Of course, if I hunt in CA, i'll bring in lead-free bullets as necessary to comply with CA law.) Thanks! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I plan on bringing in a thousand or more rounds at a time when I come to visit friends and family in CA, which will be happening periodically a few times a year. Are there any restrictions on me stockpiling ammo, say in a storage locker, when I leave CA, or giving it to immediate family members within CA? Also, as a non-resident, would I be allowed to buy ammunition in CA? Thanks! |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Possibly. However, a "trade" can still be legally considered a "sale" since the receiving party is exchanging something of value for the ammo. Or, are you trying to say that legally the only way it can be a "sale" is if US dollars are exchanged? What about other currency like crypto currency, foreign currencies, shells or beads? Would using one of those be legally considered a "trade"?
__________________
NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun and Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor California DOJ Certified Fingerprint Roller Ventura County approved CCW Instructor Utah CCW Instructor Offering low cost multi state CCW, private basic shooting and reloading classes for calgunners. ![]() KM6WLV Last edited by CSACANNONEER; 01-04-2018 at 10:29 PM.. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
(a) is definitely referring to sales. A gift is not a sale. What about an exchange? I have a box of .45 I do not need that I will trade for your box of 9 mm you do not need? I would not call that a sale since both sides come out about the same. Of course the state might want to call that a sale and consider it two different transactions. A FTF transaction requires two parties. I believe your confusion is with the word transferor. A transferor is the person initiating the exchange, not the person on the receiving end. So the seller, deliverer, or transferor all reference the party giving away the ammo either by selling it, delivering it as an agent for someone else, or as a gift or for whatever reason. The party receiving it is not mentioned but assumed to be there because a FTF transaction requires a giver and a receiver. Back to the confusion: (a) says the sale of any ammunition by any party has to be conducted though a LAV but (b) says the sale, delivery or transfer of ammo can only occur in a FTF transaction provided that (I am rewording a bit to fit what I believe the meaning to be) if party A acquired the ammo over the Internet or a phone order he would have to first have it sent to a LAV to have it processed then Party A could transfer it to Party B. (a) says a sale has to go through a LAV but (b) seemingly says one party can sell to another in a FTF transaction without needing to go through a LAV. With that contradiction, then can one safely say if it is not a sale, just a gift or exchange, it can be done FTF without going through a LAV. Add to all the confusion, I believe (I could be wrong) right now there is no paperwork for LAV. I have not bought ammo but from the few stories I have heard from people buying at Walmart, they just show ID, pay, and are on their way. If that is the case, then all one needs to do is go into the store of a LAV and exchange the ammo with the vendor watching and everything is good. That is until 7/1/19. It is poorly written. There is no doubt the politicians and the majority of voters have jumped well over the line to passing extremely confusing and unenforceable laws that will have no effect on criminals and cause many of the law abiding to just give up and give up guns or give up trying to live as a law abiding citizen. We are truly treated as subjects in this state.
__________________
Anyone can look around and see the damage to the state and country inflicted by bad politicians. A vote is clearly much more dangerous than a gun. Why advocate restrictions on one right (voting) without comparable restrictions on another (self defense) (or, why not say 'Be a U.S. citizen' as the requirement for CCW)? --Librarian |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You need another flow chart devoted to the new ammo restrictions (like you have for "assault weapons." etc.). This is just too much material to have to wade through if you have a specific question.
Make it for CA residents and non-residents alike. I take it that non-residents are immune to such bull**** under the new ammo restrictions? If so, you could put a bullet point off to the side that says: "Restrictions not applicable to non-residents" (if that is indeed the case). CA gun owners need to make friends with non-residents driving into CA with space in their car trunks! Last edited by MeatAxe; 01-05-2018 at 9:10 AM.. |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Noted.
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ok I have one.
Me and the wife go to Reno. She buys 1,000 rounds of ammo. We go to the car and she hands me the case of ammo and gives me a kiss and says "Here you go. Here is a gift for being you." She gives me another kiss and off we go back home to Ca. Legal? |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What makes you think you have a right to trial by jury for a first time infraction?
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The answer may lie somewhere in here. https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2 "sale" consists in the passing of title from the seller to the buyer for a price What does "price" consist of? Way beyond my pay grade.
__________________
"Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth." George Washington "The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed." Thomas Jefferson |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
A trade is 'value for value''; one presumes each participant is happy with his/her end of the deal. This stuff we call 'money' represents value*. While vastly the more frequent occurrence, using money in exchange for goods is easily thought to be a subset of 'trade'. * arguing monetary theory goes to Off Topic - does not fit in this thread or forum.
__________________
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."Ann Althouse: “Begin with the hypothesis that what they did is what they wanted to do. If they postured that they wanted to do something else, regard that as a con. Work from there. The world will make much more sense.” Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs. ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |