|
Semiauto Rifles Gallery Post pictures of your rifles and carbines here! |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
MY CA COMPLIANT GUN
TRYING MY BEST TO STILL LOOK GOOD LOL
Ok guys I hacked, I mean cut the lower buffer tube to leave a gap between butstock and lower buffer to eliminate the possibility of the doj considering this a single stock with a any kind of hole in it.. give feed back folks Last edited by plutonium; 06-18-2017 at 1:08 PM.. Reason: update |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
If that is the case I will shorten the bottom buffer so you can see a gap between the bottom of butt stock and bottom buffer tube... but that would be one big thumbhole as you describe it... is there a distinct definition of thumbhole??
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I like where you were going OP< but yes +4 on the thumb stock.
Its like a Hera without the insert. May loose the support to the robber but pad. Maybe try one of those solid end cap type stocks Attachment 614499 Last edited by Calico1404; 08-01-2017 at 12:18 PM.. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
This is not legal advise from anyone here, simply based on the information we have gained and have been allowed from the State thus far. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
As long as there are two pieces that are not touching, like in your second pic, I'd say you're GTG. Reminds me of when folks were gearing up to defend the U-15 in court, they even had a topographical expert lined up to define what a hole is. There's a joke in there somewhere re: our legislators and a hole in the ground.
__________________
I meant, it is my opinion that... I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence I would advise violence. - M. Gandhi You're my kind of stupid. - M. Reynolds |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Why is there a tube sticking passed the grip?
__________________
Quote:
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
the new grip (CA compliant) to me is already ugly so I added the buffer tube. plus I was able to mount my sling catch there. if I see something better looking then I will switch it out or take it off.. God knows im looking lol
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Your muzzle break also looks like a flash hider. The hole at the tip needs to be the same size as the barrel. Cant tell from the side.
__________________
Quote:
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
I know I don't know why the gun sheriffs always talking about how someone gun looks like or should look like ....... everyone like their guns different even though calif is not allowing us to many choices.... hers my ninja Mossberg 12 gauge.. maybe I can scare an intruder to death before I have to pull the trigger...lol
DSCN0351.jpg |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
That's a popular theory, but that's all it is. There is no written definition that mandates that, just opinions.
__________________
I meant, it is my opinion that... I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence I would advise violence. - M. Gandhi You're my kind of stupid. - M. Reynolds |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
I meant, it is my opinion that... I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence I would advise violence. - M. Gandhi You're my kind of stupid. - M. Reynolds |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Here is my rifle that has all but a forward grip as I am really not a fan(maybe I should add one just to show how dumb anti gunners are) I am just not a featureless ar-15 kind of guy... |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The brake is fine. That is a YHM muzzle brake with glass breaker tangs, the opening is bore diameter, I have one. Andrew - Lancaster, CA NRA Life Member, Calguns.net contributor, CGF / SAF / CRPA / FPC / NRA-ILA contributor, USCCA member |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
I just think if it looks like a duck, it must be a duck. Are we to believe there are no ignorant anti gun officers looking to enforce these dumb laws? Just seems like it will be a major inconvenience and a way to have your rifle seized.
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And a semi auto selector switch looks just like a burst selector switch. What matters is the function is illegal or not. They aren’t going to test fire the weapon and measure the flash to decide in the field. What will determine if your firearm is seized or not is your interaction with LE and whether it appears there is additional reason to arrest or confiscate. Andrew - Lancaster, CA NRA Life Member, Calguns.net contributor, CGF / SAF / CRPA / FPC / NRA-ILA contributor, USCCA member |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Like said, if you have what looks like a flash hider, and your rifle is not fixed magazine... There will be some dumbass anti gun cop who you are going to have to explain, "No officer, it only looks like a flash hider, but it's actually a compensator..." Then, you will fin yourself in the courtroom of a liberal judge and you will once again have to explain to them the same... |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
MY CA COMPLIANT GUN
Quote:
Do you want to explain to all of us exactly what a flash hider “looks like” since it seems so clear in your mind? Try referencing the law while you do. Edit: I’ll jump to the point... your response about “dumb *** cop” is just as uninformed as the hypothetical officer you reference. If you cannot inform them specifically about the legality of your firearm and why it is so then you shouldn’t own it for your own good. To say “that looks scary don’t do it” is EXACTLY what the gun grabbers want. To play that game is unacceptable to me; sure you can make your own decision, but to then also rail against “dumb *** cops” is ironic. I have more than one law enforcement friend that I had to inform just that there are changes in these laws not just that there are specifics. That does not make them dumb *** cops, it makes them busy, overworked, and expected to memorize a ridiculous set of codes. They should not enforce something they don’t understand, but to respond as you do when they may not know the law will for sure get your gun impounded... not because they are “dumb *** cops” but because you are uninformed and unable to respond as an adult. The device referenced is a muzzle brake because the exit hole is bore diameter, the holes vent gasses into the shooters vision not away, and it is specifically marketed as a brake. And the bigger irony is by choosing to go fixed mag you are ALOT more likely to have to explain yourself to an officer than a featureless build because your rifle by appearance violates the law whereas you argue that merely having a brake that may appear to be a flash hider is so scary. Andrew - Lancaster, CA NRA Life Member, Calguns.net contributor, CGF / SAF / CRPA / FPC / NRA-ILA contributor, USCCA member Last edited by lordmorgul; 10-20-2018 at 10:37 AM.. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
"Here is the definition of an assault weapon based on CA DoJ Bureau of Firearms, Generic Characteristics Defining Assault Weapons: 12276.1 (a) Notwithstanding Penal Code section 12276, “assault weapon” shall also mean the following: Rifles (1) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following: (A) A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon. (B) A thumbhole stock. (C) A folding or telescoping stock. (D) A grenade launcher or flare launcher. (E) A flash suppressor. (F) A forward pistol grip. (2) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds. (3) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches. Note: Bayonets and bayonet lugs are not assault weapon characteristics under California law." See how easy a fixed magazine rifle is vs a featureless rifle that has a flash hider looking comp? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|