|
Coronavirus/COVID19 Temp Forum This is a temporary forum for discussion, debate, sharing and helping each other during and in relation to the Coronavirus/COVID19 |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
The Emerging Narratives To Promote Vaccination - Half Truths and Outright Lies
It would seem, now that they have their 'permission slip' from DOJ, the narrative(s) are forming.
There are three which I think predominate at the moment.
Quote:
Quote:
Such seems to hint at the strategy; i.e., the USE of narratives to persuade regarding 'science-related' matters such as vaccines. Where they slip is in their conflation and application. Yet, as is often the case, they further give themselves away with snippets such as: "audiences have a difficult time identifying errors in narratives and will generally accept those errors as fact." What was it Joe Biden said in 2019... Biden tells Iowans: 'We choose truth over facts' Another snippet would be... "narratives can also perpetuate misinformation and inaccuracies." Clearly, both sides of the issue are guilty of that, all while declaring their own, intrinsic accuracy while decrying the utter falsehood of the other. Yet, it would seem that, as is often the case, projection of intent is found in the narrative itself. In short, be careful of the narratives from both sides; but, take note of the emerging narratives pushing vaccination as it is, potentially, the more insidious in terms of our rights, our freedoms, and our future. That's not a statement supporting anti-vaccination. It's an advisory to not be persuaded by the narrative and, instead, look to the facts and how they apply to your, individual circumstance. Last edited by TrappedinCalifornia; 07-29-2021 at 8:27 PM.. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'd suggest you check your hole card and confirm that your backers actually put real money in the kitty before you make such a 'call.' As has been discussed already, if I have to explain, detail, and highlight it for you, there's little chance you're going to agree, let alone understand it. (We see this between you and me/several others when 'facts' are presented or your own beliefs are challenged.) But, once again, thank you for illustrating and reinforcing what the author of "the paper" referenced said... Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
There's only one side here foisting an agenda on the population. I and many other others can clearly see their narrative is just lies to coerce/force an injection on the world's population. There's no "two sides" with two competing narratives. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If you go back and read the OP, the intent of "the paper" was using narrative, rather than facts or facts alone, as a counter-narrative. Both sides are doing exactly that. What you choose to believe is not the entirety of fact and truth. Simply because the Left is, as I said, more overt and with more transparent goals related to the acquisition/exercise of power doesn't mean the Right is any less culpable in foisting 'narratives' related to COVID. In fact, the very idea that "there's no 'two sides' with two, competing narratives" is, itself, a narrative, not fact and your personal belief doesn't alter that. Do the facts, as we know and understand them, favor the narrative being put forth by many on the Right? I'd have to agree with that. Do the facts, as we know and understand them, favor ALL the narratives coming from the Right, conspiracy theorists, etc.? Simple answer... No. At the moment, however, the clearly more nefarious narratives are emerging from the Left. As I noted, the three, most obvious, are...
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Contrary to what the CCP controlled media parrots, about 50% of Americans have refused the jab. Add the number of people who have received the jab and wish they hadn't... the combo of the 2 groups is the majority.
It is time for the silent majority to no longer remain silent. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I actually appreciate your post, I find it interesting. I just don't agree with the left/right, two sides, etc. My gut tells me that this whole vaccination thing is a setup for something much worse. I pray I'm wrong though.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I think that supports the argument above that there’s no sides. It’s either the system or freedom and Trump only SAID things against the system. Everything he DID totally furthered the system of control.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
That being said, going back to the OP, the only thing that will break the two narratives is when hospitalisations and deaths remain low and stay there. This will all quietly disappear into the night. Even with a population of 50% vaccinated, once you account for natural immunity, the virus will start to fade back as more of a minor endemic annoyance then a pressing social danger. Even if governments try to push rules, more and more of the population will start to ignore them.
__________________
For you to believe globalization can continue, you have to believe it doesn't require increased consumption and that the Americans will continue to bleed and die so that the Chinese can access energy. - Peter Zeihan |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Insofar as the second, if Government mandates vaccines across the board, it's going to be difficult to 'ignore.' If businesses enforce mandates, a lot will depend on what your tolerance levels are for inconvenience, discomfort, pain, etc. However, I think that's precisely why we're in the 'narrative' phase; i.e., where they are looking for an effective 'sales pitch' (or bogeyman) to overcome the blow back that's already started. Not to mention that part of that blow back is stemming from things like... Fauci And Rand Paul Accuse Each Other Of Lying In Tense Testimony Over Covid Origins Which narrative do or are you supposed to believe? Are there elements of 'truth' in both, neither? For Thee and Me, I suspect that Fauci is, at best, practicing legerdemain and, at worst, flat out lying. Can Senator Paul prove that in court? I doubt it, but that's what he wants us to think... Rand Paul to Fox News: Justice Department should pursue 'criminal referral' against Fauci; i.e., a 'narrative' is being created by Paul. Why is the narrative perceived as necessary? Because it's both a political and a PR battle at the moment. It's also why Fauci tried to change the narrative with his counter-accusations during his testimony. Ultimately, I'd just like to get to the 'endemic' stage many of us have been predicting for awhile and move on to the next 'crisis of the moment' that'll be used by one side or the other or both. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
We no longer need to argue about whether the election was stolen (I believe it was.) Since the election results are now fully certified the Dems are in solid control, that is a fact. Most government bureaucracies reluctantly did what they were told under Trump because to openly disobey would mean biting the hand that feeds. Now that the Dems are in charge they are eager to continue with the globalist agenda as they had for decades. The most active resistance is coming from Red states, God bless them, with Texas and Florida leading. I hope they continue to have courage in the face of similar forces that were stacked against Trump. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But do THEY have the constitutional right to coerce others into taking an experimental medical treatment that may or may not have side effects which the manufacturer is by law not liable for? Legitimate question.
__________________
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Addressed on your OT thread asking the same question.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|