Scope ring recoil lugs. Which is better? Integrated or cross bolt?

[Sydwaiz]

I'm trying to choose a set of rings for my tactical lever build. I'm looking at aluminum rings from Vortex and Warne. Vortex uses an integrated recoil lug machined into the ring and 2 clamp screws and Warne uses a steel cross bolt as a recoil lug and clamp screw in one. They both do the same thing, just a different approach. I'm just curious if one is ultimately better than the other and why and which type do you prefer?

https://warnescopemounts.com/7214m-w...m-matte-rings/

https://vortexoptics.com/vortex-pro-...0mm-rings.html

[Mute]

I've used both types before. As long as the product is good quality, I don't think you'll find much of a durability difference.

[Sydwaiz]

Originally Posted by Mute

I've used both types before. As long as the product is good quality, I don't think you'll find much of a durability difference.

That's what I'm thinking as well. I have several of both and simply have never given it much thought until now. Just curious what the consensus was if there even is one! LOL!

[theLBC]

i wouldn't expect it makes a significant different, as long as they are pushed forward and make solid contact with the rail.
personally i prefer 1-piece mounts where possible.

[voiceofreason]

The Vortex made by Seekins are great

I've had issues with Warne rings not holding zero

These will all hold zero with .308 easily:

Nightforce Ultralite 4 screw rings
Nightforce unmount/one piece
Spuhr
Seekins Rings
The Vortex branded Seekins that look exactly like Seekins
ARC M10, Brace
Badger anything