Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > 2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #3281  
Old 02-21-2024, 8:04 AM
NATO762's Avatar
NATO762 NATO762 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: SF Bay-ish Area
Posts: 394
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I think Chuck said they are considering a writ of mandamus.
Reply With Quote
  #3282  
Old 02-21-2024, 9:00 AM
AlmostHeaven AlmostHeaven is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,059
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NATO762 View Post
I think Chuck said they are considering a writ of mandamus.
Fingers crossed.
Reply With Quote
  #3283  
Old 02-21-2024, 9:11 AM
ritter ritter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: North Bay Area
Posts: 785
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlmostHeaven View Post
Duncan v. Bonta: En banc panel seized direct control via an unprecedented "takeback" mechanism.
Miller v. Bonta: 3-judge panel held the case pending Duncan v. Bonta.
Rhode v. Bonta: The Ninth Circuit simply has chosen to not draw a 3-judge panel.

Frankly, unless the Supreme Court intervenes, it's over for the Second Amendment in California.
This is essentially the same approach CA9 took in the couple of years' runup to Bruen. Hold all cases pending the outcome of the leading case and then slow roll that one until it can be held pending something at SCOTUS. It's a lot easier than issuing word salad, I guess. A right delayed is of no concern to CA9.
Reply With Quote
  #3284  
Old 02-21-2024, 8:00 PM
AlmostHeaven AlmostHeaven is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,059
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by ritter View Post
This is essentially the same approach CA9 took in the couple of years' runup to Bruen. Hold all cases pending the outcome of the leading case and then slow roll that one until it can be held pending something at SCOTUS. It's a lot easier than issuing word salad, I guess. A right delayed is of no concern to CA9.
If the Supreme Court does not directly address one of the high-profile Second Amendment issues (i.e. assault weapons bans, high-capacity magazine bans, or sensitive places restrictions) by 2025, my anxiety will go off the charts. The community cannot afford another 12-year hiatus like the one between McDonald v. City of Chicago and NYSRPA v. Bruen.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:59 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy