Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > 2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-10-2019, 5:15 PM
wolfwood's Avatar
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,370
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default Teter et al v. Connors et al Hawaii Butterfly knife federal lawsuit filed

https://www.scribd.com/document/4058...h-All-Exhibits
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato

Last edited by wolfwood; 08-20-2021 at 10:07 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-10-2019, 6:04 PM
speedrrracer speedrrracer is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,355
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I wonder if including this sort of discussion is wise:

Quote:
The old argument is that a switch blade or balisong is too dangerous to be entrusted to the public because a citizen can pull and quickly open the blade with one hand.
(snip)
Butterfly knife 1.3, 1.4. 1.2, 1.5 Average = 1.35 seconds
(emphasis mine)

Talking about speed, lethality, statistics -- all this seems like giving up territory and giving ammunition to the other side. So if balisongs were ultra-fast instead of slow on the draw should they continue to be banned? If their handles did not enclose the blade, should they continue to be banned? If they accounted for a higher percentage of murders in HI than pistols, should they continue to be banned?

Arms are supposed to be dangerous, lethal, etc. It's the whole point, and the reason why protecting the right to keep and bear them is so important. Opening the door to arbitrary measures as a reason why weapon X is OK will eventually backfire against us, because there is no limit to which arbitrary measures of safety / speed / lethality can be introduced, and it won't take long until the antis will find those arbitrary measures which favor their side, and then what?

None of this should be taken as a criticism of your great work, just having a discussion and trying to learn from the man on the front lines!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-10-2019, 6:57 PM
Unbekannt Unbekannt is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 378
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Traditional Chinese Martial Arts also have what they call a Butterfly knives. These are actually paired, rather broad, flat blades maybe 18 inches long. They are used like nunchucks in their motion. These are basically Bronze Age weapons and really have no practical value in the modern world except as a training tool.

Your butterfly knives are different from these but I am wondering if these Chinese knives were banned in Hawaii too?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-10-2019, 7:10 PM
skyblue314 skyblue314 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 104
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfwood View Post
Today I filed a case I've been wanting to file for about 7 years. Hawaii bans the ownership of butterfly knives for no apparent reason. Thankfully Burton Richardson Andrew Namiki Roberts and the Hawaii Firearms Coalition have teamed up with myself and my clients to challenge this unconstitutional law. Please look at the complaint and Burton's expert report.



https://www.scribd.com/document/4058...ith-Burton-Dec
I'd love someone to file suit in California too. They aren't illegal to own, but sales are still banned.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-10-2019, 7:16 PM
readysetgo's Avatar
readysetgo readysetgo is offline
Garv Overlord
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: 805, Caught Between My Woman And My Pistol And My Chips
Posts: 8,688
iTrader: 53 / 100%
Default

Free the balisong!

Did you reach out/coordinate with KnifeRights?
__________________
Stand up and be counted, or lay down and be mounted... -Mac

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-10-2019, 7:16 PM
M1NM M1NM is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: West Covina
Posts: 7,760
iTrader: 54 / 100%
Default

You need to look no further than the flag of Hawaii as to why they would adopt English style knife bans.
Attachment 794954

Last edited by M1NM; 03-30-2020 at 11:40 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-10-2019, 7:55 PM
bohoki's Avatar
bohoki bohoki is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 95401
Posts: 20,654
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default

reminds me of that new york nunchuck lawsuit
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-10-2019, 8:27 PM
pacrat pacrat is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Socialist Republic of SoCal
Posts: 10,220
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

Quote:
the right of the people to keep and bear ARMS, shall not be infringed.
No mention of just firearms.

GO GET EM WOLFIE
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-19-2019, 8:23 AM
Mrbroom Mrbroom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Redondo Beach
Posts: 361
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfwood View Post
California also ban nunchucks. I think that would be a good case down the road in light of the NY ruling
My daughters Tae Kwon Do school still teaches with nunchucks. I don’t know the exact wording of the law however they are allowed to own them and teach. My daughter who will be testing for her black belt in a few months will be able to purchase and own them once that level is achieved according to our studio. Maybe a martial arts enthusiast exemption or something.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-19-2019, 8:55 AM
wpod's Avatar
wpod wpod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,394
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrbroom View Post
My daughters Tae Kwon Do school still teaches with nunchucks. I don’t know the exact wording of the law however they are allowed to own them and teach. My daughter who will be testing for her black belt in a few months will be able to purchase and own them once that level is achieved according to our studio. Maybe a martial arts enthusiast exemption or something.
They can be owned for demonstration/competition use onlyaq

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-19-2019, 10:22 AM
357manny's Avatar
357manny 357manny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: PRK
Posts: 1,677
iTrader: 24 / 100%
Default

Awesome, thank you sir for filing!

Here's another article detailing your efforts:
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/04/haw...ndment-grounds
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-01-2019, 7:24 PM
DisgruntledReaper's Avatar
DisgruntledReaper DisgruntledReaper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,844
iTrader: 41 / 100%
Default

So these cork suckers basically dont want to cough anyhthing up and cry and whine and object to everything...

Well,in the future we the firearm and knife owning public should be able to cite the same reasons or variations of,such as how vague and ambiguous various gun control laws are and the fact that they are intentionally vague cannot be accurately interpreted and cause pain and burden upon us...

What a bunch of tools,worthless,id be on their asses for being incompetent in the job and duties.

I wish you luck and hopefully someone with balls calks them out on their bs.
__________________
'There is no theory of evolution, just a list of creatures Chuck Norris allows to live.'

'I have so many good karma points I am approaching Saint Hood'

"They tell you of a laundry detergent that takes out bloodstains- I'm thinking that if you have clothes covered in bloodstains-maybe laundry isn't your biggest problem"

[SIGPIC]http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/signaturepics/sigpic27069_2.gif[/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-01-2019, 8:56 PM
aBrowningfan aBrowningfan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,475
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrbroom View Post
My daughters Tae Kwon Do school still teaches with nunchucks. I don’t know the exact wording of the law however they are allowed to own them and teach. My daughter who will be testing for her black belt in a few months will be able to purchase and own them once that level is achieved according to our studio. Maybe a martial arts enthusiast exemption or something.
The CA ban on nunchaku would seem to be a good opportunity for a test case: https://www.mantecabulletin.com/opin...ng-overturned/
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-01-2019, 8:58 PM
hermosabeach's Avatar
hermosabeach hermosabeach is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: South Bay of Los Angeles
Posts: 18,386
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

My machete is already open
__________________
Rule 1- ALL GUNS ARE ALWAYS LOADED

Rule 2 -NEVER LET THE MUZZLE COVER ANYTHING YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO DESTROY (including your hands and legs)

Rule 3 -KEEP YOUR FINGER OFF THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOUR SIGHTS ARE ON THE TARGET

Rule 4 -BE SURE OF YOUR TARGET AND WHAT IS BEYOND IT
(thanks to Jeff Cooper)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-01-2019, 9:02 PM
Sir Toast's Avatar
Sir Toast Sir Toast is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,997
iTrader: 27 / 100%
Default

But the children? ?????
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-04-2019, 11:57 PM
saki302's Avatar
saki302 saki302 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 7,134
iTrader: 94 / 100%
Default

Haha, nunchucks would be cool to own.. but are more dangerous to rhenuser unless you're trained in their use (I wasn't. nearly cracked an elbow when I was 12!)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-05-2019, 1:14 PM
wolfwood's Avatar
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,370
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Initial disclosures filed.

https://www.scribd.com/document/4208...duIKKPO6znJW80
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-12-2019, 9:40 PM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,285
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Be sure to edit the title of this thread with the case name and status.

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-12-2019, 9:52 PM
Epaphroditus's Avatar
Epaphroditus Epaphroditus is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Where the McRib runs wild and free!
Posts: 4,876
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Fixed blades are legal and already "open" so the speed argument is asinine. Brandishing laws already cover "scary" situations.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-14-2019, 5:52 PM
crufflers's Avatar
crufflers crufflers is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,700
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hermosabeach View Post
My machete is already open
My machete is in a canvas sheath with slow as hell snap closures.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-31-2019, 7:41 AM
billt's Avatar
billt billt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lake Havasu City, Arizona
Posts: 1,179
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

This has always turned me on about Butterfly Knives.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYTp...index=163&t=0s
__________________
If common sense was so common, why don't liberals possess any?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-31-2019, 9:30 AM
DrjonesUSA's Avatar
DrjonesUSA DrjonesUSA is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,599
iTrader: 26 / 100%
Default

Thanks for the updates & for fighting this battle!
Best of luck!!!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-14-2020, 8:59 AM
wolfwood's Avatar
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,370
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

MSJ got filed


https://www.scribd.com/document/4429...-case-MSJ-Memo


https://www.scribd.com/document/4429...t-and-Exhibits
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato

Last edited by wolfwood; 01-14-2020 at 9:49 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-14-2020, 9:17 AM
HUTCH 7.62's Avatar
HUTCH 7.62 HUTCH 7.62 is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Josie
Posts: 11,298
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bohoki View Post
reminds me of that new york nunchuck lawsuit
Just having a hard time envisioning a guy robbing liqueur stores with nunchucks
__________________
Some say that he once mooned two prostitutes just for a round of drinks, but wasn't surprised by the reply......They call him, the Hutch
Some say that he rode a dirtbike 7k miles across the country and that he once applied Bengay to his own testicles for a mere $50............They call him, the Hutch -Top Gear

http://media.liveauctiongroup.net/i/...CCAB7CE8D70F60
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-15-2020, 7:12 PM
wolfwood's Avatar
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,370
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Hawaii filed its MSJ

Now its time to write the opposition

https://www.scribd.com/document/4431...FV4gJ7YYn8E0do
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-15-2020, 11:46 PM
wolfwood's Avatar
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,370
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Hawaii Firearms Coalition filed an amicus brief

https://www.scribd.com/document/4431...arms-Coalition
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-20-2020, 5:32 AM
Jalibass's Avatar
Jalibass Jalibass is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 187
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Epaphroditus View Post
Fixed blades are legal and already "open" so the speed argument is asinine. Brandishing laws already cover "scary" situations.
Good going... now they are likely working on a law that will compel all fixed blade owners to audibly count to three before drawing a fixed blade from its sheath.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-27-2020, 1:06 PM
phrogg111's Avatar
phrogg111 phrogg111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Folsom
Posts: 750
iTrader: 10 / 92%
Default

You got the logic completely wrong on your lawsuit.

If a butterfly knife is more dangerous, it is more constitutionally protected.

The 2nd amendment protects "arms" - not tools.

It protects "arms" for the purpose of "the people" maintaining "the security of a free State"

If the object you're trying to talk about, related to the 2nd amendment, cannot be used to assault people, whenever assaulting people is "necessary to the security of a free State", then it is not constitutionally protected at all.

It is not my opinion, but inarguable fact, that the 2nd amendment ONLY protects weapons for assaulting people.

This argument is first and foremost why the 2nd amendment should be winning here.

The secondary argument is that the knife laws do nothing that the states claim they do. They do nothing to public safety, as other knives can open more quickly than a butterfly knife by far. They don't help keep people from being hurt, as they're not used in crimes that often. These secondary arguments are also reason to throw the knife bans out completely...

But the most important argument is that banning weapons, for assaulting peopel, violates 18USC 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights, and 18USC 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law. These two laws carry a maximum penalty of death. When lawmakers should be put in prison, up to life, or put to death, for passing these unconstitutional state laws, there is no question that the laws need to be thrown out immediately.
__________________
Hunting is a loophole in the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of Rights.

There is no privilege to keep and bear arms.

Arms are for killing people. All other uses of an arm are illegitimate uses.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-27-2020, 3:13 PM
bohoki's Avatar
bohoki bohoki is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 95401
Posts: 20,654
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default

the burden should be that they are somehow more dangerous than a comparable legal product and the case should be dismissed the moment a master balisong user goes up against anyone with any assisted opener in an opening contest
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-29-2020, 5:25 PM
Kukuforguns's Avatar
Kukuforguns Kukuforguns is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Los Angeles County
Posts: 659
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfwood View Post
Hawaii filed its MSJ

Now its time to write the opposition

https://www.scribd.com/document/4431...FV4gJ7YYn8E0do
I haven't read the amicus briefs, but the MSJ itself contains some real whoppers.

1) HI argues that because gang members possess butterfly knives, it follows that law abiding citizens do not typically possess butterfly knives. This is a logical fallacy. Butterfly knives can be possessed by both law-abiding citizens and criminals. In fact, HI's own evidence indicates that butterfly knives were being sold openly, which suggests that law-abiding citizens do possess the knives.

2) HI argues that butterfly knives are more dangerous than "regular" knives because they are readily concealable whereas regular knives are not readily concealable. I think you should go to court with a whole bunch of regular (albeit rubber) knives secreted on your person and start pulling them out of your sleeves and pockets.

That is a startlingly incompetent MSJ.
__________________
WTB: Magazines for S&W M&P 9c
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 03-30-2020, 11:48 AM
wolfwood's Avatar
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,370
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Today we filed our opposition to the State of Hawaii's motion for summary judgement. In person oral arguments have been canceled due to the virus but we should be having telephonic arguments on April 28th.

https://www.scribd.com/document/4540...fly-Knife-Case
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-07-2020, 7:46 PM
wolfwood's Avatar
wolfwood wolfwood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,370
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

State of Hawaii opposition to our summary judgement
https://pdfhost.io/v/V0a0OdRRA_Teter...y_knifepdf.pdf
__________________
“We are twice armed if we fight with faith.”

― Plato
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-29-2020, 6:35 AM
The War Wagon's Avatar
The War Wagon The War Wagon is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: da' 'BURGH
Posts: 10,294
iTrader: 29 / 100%
Red face

If CA is "STOOOOPID on steroids," than HI is "STOOOPID on acid!"
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-11-2020, 8:41 AM
DrjonesUSA's Avatar
DrjonesUSA DrjonesUSA is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,599
iTrader: 26 / 100%
Default

Hopefully someone here can help rather than me starting a new thread.

I just wanted to double-double check this because this state is such a clown world.

I recently purchased a balisong trainer, similar to this;

https://www.bladehq.com/item--Boker-...Trainer--76461

It's a totally UN-sharpened, NON-functional blade; a pure trainer.

I wanted to verify that such an item is 100% LEGAL for me to own & carry in public in this clown world state of California.

IF a cop were to stop to ensure it wasn't a live blade (which it very clearly isn't, but at a distance who knows) would I be in any risk of arrest, citation, or having it confiscated?

I think a trainer bali is the ultimate fidget toy and there are some true work of art trainers out there!

To stay OT, LIBERATE THE BALISONG!

Thank you!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-14-2020, 9:38 AM
FirearmFino FirearmFino is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 428
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING THE STATE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, re ECF 33 Plaintiffs' Motion, and ECF 36 State's Motion - Signed by JUDGE ALAN C. KAY on 5/13/2020.For the foregoing reasons, the Court holds that HRS ยง 134-53(a) is not an unconstitutional restriction on the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment. To summarize the Court's ruling: (1) butterfly knives are bearable arms that trigger Second Amendment protections; (2) the Court assumes without deciding that butterfly knives are commonly used by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes and therefore fall within the historical scope of the Second Amendment; (3) the ban on butterfly knives is not per se unconstitutional under Heller; (4) because the ban implicates the core right under the Second Amendment but does not severely burden that right, intermediate scrutiny applies; and (5) the statute survives intermediate scrutiny because it furthers the State's important interest to promote public safety by reducing access to butterfly knives, which leads to gang-related crime.While recognizing that Heller does not cleanly resolve all the constitutional questions at play here, this analysis is faithful to Heller. The Court hereby DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTS the State's Motion for Summary Judgment.(jni) (Entered: 05/13/2020)

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/...43892.61.0.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 05-14-2020, 10:56 AM
Offwidth Offwidth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 1,212
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Here we go. Intermediate scrutiny all the things. No one cares about the common use standard.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 05-14-2020, 3:12 PM
TruOil TruOil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,847
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

What evidence was there that balisongs, which I assume have been banned for some time, lead to gang-related crime but assisted opening knives do not?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 05-17-2020, 5:05 AM
press1280 press1280 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 3,017
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TruOil View Post
What evidence was there that balisongs, which I assume have been banned for some time, lead to gang-related crime but assisted opening knives do not?
So the logic here is that gang bangers will put away their life of crime if butterfly knives are banned. Are these judges that stupid?
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 05-17-2020, 8:48 AM
Offwidth Offwidth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 1,212
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TruOil View Post
What evidence was there that balisongs, which I assume have been banned for some time, lead to gang-related crime but assisted opening knives do not?
Government said so. Evidence not required. Obey.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 08-21-2020, 4:33 PM
DrjonesUSA's Avatar
DrjonesUSA DrjonesUSA is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,599
iTrader: 26 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfwood View Post
Thanks for this!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 6:55 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy