Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > 2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #921  
Old 01-19-2019, 12:37 PM
Chewy65 Chewy65 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,374
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Earlier there was a discussion as to whether the panel decision would be attacked since should it be overturned SCOTUS may grant cert. At the time it was composed of four liberals, incuding RGB, four conservatives, and Roberts. Now it is looking like RGB will be off the court and replaced by another conservative. Given this will the libs really want a win en banc that SCOTUS could reverse with the effect being conservative precedence.
Reply With Quote
  #922  
Old 01-19-2019, 8:23 PM
CCWFacts CCWFacts is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,710
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

That's the issue they should be thinking about right now. SCOTUS is not a place where they can win, and even an en banc could be a loss for them. This graphic is from Nov. 2018 so it may not be completely up to date, but it shows what's going on at the circuit level:



In the 9th, the en banc panel is randomly drawn, and someone could do the calculation to see what are the odds of getting a conservative panel of 11 judges from the 9th, esp. when all the seats are filled.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #923  
Old 01-19-2019, 8:54 PM
Robotron2k84 Robotron2k84 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 617
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

https://hotair.com/archives/2019/01/...s-rob-workers/

Quote:
Here’s a case you’ll want to keep an eye on in the months ahead. Since the decision was handed down in Janus v AFSCME, public sector unions, in particular, have been on the ropes. No longer able to extract union dues (or “agency fees”) from workers and use them for political speech the employee may disagree with, the cash cow has largely ceased giving milk. But unions in Oregon clearly aren’t ready to go down without a fight. Legislators in the Beaver State are now moving forward with a bill clearly designed to subvert the Supreme Court decision and keep money flowing into the union coffers.
The leftists know that if they lose control of SCOTUS and aren't able to stack the court, they can always give a straight-up FU to the bench and simply ignore their rulings.

This puts us right at 1836 on the civil war clock. It's just going to get more dicey as time goes on.

Last edited by Robotron2k84; 01-19-2019 at 8:57 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:14 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
Calguns.net and The Calguns Foundation have no affiliation and are in no way related to each other.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.