|
2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Nichols Vs. Brown Live NOW
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I think the judges found it interesting that there are exempted classes of people like hunters, but they have no 4th amendment protection against a search to see if the gun is loaded.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
As someone who doesn't get a regular opportunity to observe judges in action, I must admit I was somewhat impressed with their ability to give the appearance that they were trying to flesh out both sides of the argument...knowing all along what their ruling is going to be.
Interesting points raised for sure. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Somewhat Impressed
I haven't seen a lot of positive stuff towards Nichols on the site
I have to say - and IANAL - I think he's handling himself very well. Period. The judges are burning up a lot of his time, where he is doggedly being forced to correct the panels misinterpretation of case law findings.
__________________
Proud CGN Contributor USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected tools |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The other one is where they deny that a case holding is what the holding actually is. That false denial makes you hunt to find the holding in the case so you can cite to it directly and quote the language. This burns your time and they STILL won't acknowledge the case holding if it goes against what they want to decide.
__________________
Some random thoughts: Somebody's gotta be the mole so it might as well be me. Seems to be working so far. Evil doesn't only come in black. Life is like a discount bakery. Usually everything is just what you ordered. But, occasionally you come face to face with an unexpected fruitcake. Surprise! My Utubery |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|