|
Calguns Concealed Carry County Information Forum Information on how to get a LTC in yourCounty |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1001
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Either your interview raised some flags or your residency check prompted the psych eval. They're rare enough that we seldom hear about them here...
__________________
Discreet, Legal Carry in 37 States... |
#1002
|
||||
|
||||
You either drew the short straw and now are a sacrifical lamb so the OCSD can claim they do psych evals on applicants or your interview set something off.
__________________
My opinion on the CA Government: Quote:
|
#1003
|
|||
|
|||
They must have see something on his background to have them ask for a Psych
exam. There was another guy here on Calguns that recieved a letter like that.
__________________
|
#1004
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Do your tats represent anything specific that they'd be wondering about? I'm assuming that's you in your avatar. |
#1006
|
||||
|
||||
I would call the interviewer and tell him there has clearly been an error and the letter was issued to the wrong guy. Ask him to look into it. Go from there.
Or, you could look at it as an odd date. $150 with an intelligent woman and every minute, you're hoping you don't get screwed. |
#1007
|
||||
|
||||
My interview went well. We went through all the regular steps, joked around a little and sent me on my way. I got my livescan the next day. My past is pretty much crystal clear. The worse thing that has ever been on my record would be a speeding ticket, but from over 6 years ago. I called today and they said chances are that it was a random selection. I guess i'll play the game. It would be nice if they used a doctor that wasn't an hour away though.
|
#1008
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
#1009
|
||||
|
||||
Have not seen or heard of any psych evals. Something triggered it.
For training, it can be done over a weekend, well within a week. There's no need to stress it, it doesn't need to hold you up at all. Mine was done and submitted within a few days of my approval letter - mine was actually an email. There's no waiting for an online class, you can sign on and complete at your convenience. You just have to schedule when you can get the range portion done - mutual time for you and the range instructor.
__________________
1911 Shooter |
#1011
|
|||
|
|||
Question for you OC folks that have been approved...have any of your permits come with restrictions?
For example, if your GC statement was that you're a realtor and you show homes or host open houses by yourself, or maybe in rural/isolated/not-so-good areas, does your permit have a restriction saying it's only valid when you're engaging in that particular activity? |
#1013
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The PC requires them to use the same doc as they use for their employees.
__________________
Sent from Free America |
#1014
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry to transition this thread a bit. But, I'm aware that there are several of you kind gentlemen that will look over some "good cause" statements. Could one of you wonderful people lend this 23 year old a hand? Please and thank you!
|
#1017
|
||||
|
||||
If you want a 23 year old to review it, then PM me.
__________________
Quote:
|
#1018
|
|||
|
|||
Hey guys,
Just found this forum and there's tons of info here. Thanks so much to all for sharing. I tried to search a bit re ccw and weapon modifications but didn't see anything come up that was concrete or current. On the OCSD website they list this under "CCW License Policy" section 218.4 Quote:
Are those mods going to disqualify me from using these as ccw guns? Do I need to go buy another glock? |
#1019
|
||||
|
||||
WL, suggestion: Attend free pre-CCW class at Artemis (in your 'hood too). Mr. Lieberman will be happy to review your GC and you'll get some great additional info too. No affiliation, just sharing.
__________________
The more I know the less I don't know. |
#1020
|
||||
|
||||
Hey guys.
So I had my interview. My appointment was for 9, they finally got to me at 1035. The man at the front told me that my notarized note wasn't good. The investigator told me my letter was good. I disclosed my past as a youth and then watched his eyes glaze over. From there he started to judge. He asked for more paper work, Work Badge, Paystub, Money paperwork, and more. I should have just told him to look me up on imdb. As he walked me out, he said he didn't know if my youth past would have an effect on getting a ccw. In the end I shouldn't have shaved. I looked like I was 19, when really I'm about to turn 26. I haven't done my live scan due to busy schedule, but will probably do it tomorrow or next week. |
#1021
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
As much as I feel that a permit should not be needed to exercise our Second Amendment rights, the reality is that interpretation has thus far not been accepted in our jurisdiction. Hence, I prefer not to push the limits and take any steps that may jeopardize my privilege. If modifying my carry firearm to my tastes will lead to a heightened possibility of the Sheriff revoking my permit (no matter how small), I'm not going to do it. But beyond the issue of permits, if I end up having to use the firearm in self-defense, if modifying my carry firearm will lead to additional arguments that could be raised to challenge my credibility or otherwise have a negative impact in my defense, I'm not going to do it either. Sometimes I think we're looking at these restrictions in the wrong way. I intend to carry a firearm to mitigate risk. The natural consequence of having to rely on the firearm is facing the prospect of criminal and/or civil liability. Yes, I should have the freedom to make any modifications I want because it's my personal defense, but I ask myself if this will increase my risk of exposure to liability. If it does, it would seem to go against the fundamental premise I'm carrying the firearm to begin with - risk mitigation. If the modified guns are all you've got, then that's what it is, and you can swap out any aftermarket parts for the qualification and/or find an instructor who shares your view as to the nature of the modifications being within the scope of the Sheriff's policy. If you have the resources to purchase another firearm, however, I would strongly consider that option instead.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Life Member, SAF Life Member, CCRKBA Life Member Gavin Newsom is a lying, cheating slickster and |
#1022
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Basically, the more mods that you make to the actual mechanical firing mechanism, they more its likely to be rejected.
__________________
My opinion on the CA Government: Quote:
|
#1023
|
||||
|
||||
Got my conditional approval on 3/10 for my renewal. Have to attend a 4 hour CCW class Then fax a copy of the class cert to OCSD.
__________________
Principles over agenda |
#1024
|
||||
|
||||
Any one in the March approval batch get their pick up dates yet?
__________________
My opinion on the CA Government: Quote:
|
#1028
|
||||
|
||||
Congrats!
Quote:
Approvals continue daily!
__________________
Discreet, Legal Carry in 37 States... |
#1029
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
EDIT: No criminal activity on any record, ever. Last edited by 1Fastrider; 03-12-2016 at 11:49 AM.. Reason: more info |
#1030
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If your livescan clears fasters than someones else then that's how they process you.
__________________
Quote:
|
#1031
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
10/23/15(update request): We received your FBI on 07/07/15 12/2/15 "We have received your live scan information, but we have not received your FBI/Department of Justice paperwork from the State of California" 1/7/16 "We are pending DOJ/Firearms clearance". no reply to my monthly email in Feb or March so far. |
#1032
|
||||
|
||||
I've been following this thread for quite a while. It has been informative and entertaining at times. One thing for sure there are an awful lot of assumptions made and presented as fact. I'm not directing this at anybody, just making an observation.
__________________
If you can't explain it simply you don't understand it well enough. Albert Einstein |
#1033
|
||||
|
||||
Examples?
|
#1034
|
||||
|
||||
If I did that I would be directing it at several somebodies, lol.
__________________
If you can't explain it simply you don't understand it well enough. Albert Einstein |
#1035
|
||||
|
||||
But then they could explain/defend/discuss their assumptions that you feel are not factual...
__________________
Discreet, Legal Carry in 37 States... |
#1036
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I mean, I assume that's what you're doing. |
#1037
|
||||
|
||||
Good point, Dvrjon. Wait, does that mean I am assuming that I understand your assumption that I am assuming the assumptions of others are not factual and presenting your assumption as a fact that I am presenting my assumption as a fact?
__________________
If you can't explain it simply you don't understand it well enough. Albert Einstein |
#1038
|
||||
|
||||
I was very clear. I did not state that what I said was fact. I clearly noted that I was making an assumption. However, if you have determined that my assumption is, in fact, fact, then to you, it is a fact even though I assume that's not factually correct.
|
#1039
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Go for it, we're big boys, we can take it. Maybe you can enlighten us as to the process or vice-versa. Actually, I think your post is just the equivalent of dropping a turd in the punch bowl and waiting to see the reaction.
__________________
Sent from Free America |
#1040
|
||||
|
||||
Go for it, we're big boys, we can take it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbob76 If I did that I would be directing it at several somebodies, lol. So, what exactly are these somebodies assuming to be fact...
__________________
Discreet, Legal Carry in 37 States... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|