CRPA letter to Alameda sheriff over bad policy on CCW

[AlmostHeaven]

Originally Posted by M1A Rifleman

In reviewing activity of others, once a person receives an interview, the process seems to take about 3 months for issuance.

Why does it take over 12 months, now closer to 15 to 24 months to start the interview process. It's not rocket science to interview and background check usual the livesscan.

Wonder why the suit is not moving on this, I thought CRPA was receiving regular reports from the Sheriff supposedly showing they are processing, but their lazy approach in processing can't be right. Maybe the eye is on suit for SB2 ?

SB2, which makes concealed carry licenses essentially useless, likely has priority. However, I definitely wish litigation that challenges onerous fees and insane wait times comes soon.

[BAJ475]

Originally Posted by SilveradoColt21

You know clearly what you said and did, that's exactly why Kes called you out on it and threatened with banning you for the rest of the year, I would say you probably said some pretty demeaning things if you are getting that kind of a threat, but what do I know, it's probably second nature for you to carry yourself in that manner and say such vulgar things at this point

And calling pacrat a "a low human being" does not put you in the same category?

[BAJ475]

Cannot seem to get to page 3 of this thread.

Edit. That did it.

[pacrat]

Originally Posted by SilveradoColt21 View Post
You know clearly what you said and did, that's exactly why Kes called you out on it and threatened with banning you for the rest of the year, I would say you probably said some pretty demeaning things if you are getting that kind of a threat, but what do I know, it's probably second nature for you to carry yourself in that manner and say such vulgar things at this point

Originally Posted by BAJ475

And calling pacrat a "a low human being" does not put you in the same category?

Amazing that an individual accuses someone of being a "low human being", who says "demeaning and vulgar things".

For requoting the accusers OWN EXACT WORDS.

Yet cannot make any reference, to anything attributed to the accused. That was in fact either "demeaning or vulgar".

[SilveradoColt21]

Originally Posted by pacrat

Amazing that an individual accuses someone of being a "low human being", who says "demeaning and vulgar things".

For requoting the accusers OWN EXACT WORDS.

Yet cannot make any reference, to anything attributed to the accused. That was in fact either "demeaning or vulgar".

Whatever helps you sleep better at night, amazing how you're still going on 2 months later