#5
|
||||
|
||||
i bought standard capacity magazines.
what are these high caps you speak of my good sir?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
They were advertised as such by S&W, when they scrapped the M-39 [8 rnds]. And brought out the M-59 [14 rnds]. Which BTW actually made then SCM for the 59. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Not only did I not purchase any, but I lost all of the old ones in a tragic boating accident. I even have proof.
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Enough that they are now definitely in "common use".
__________________
___________ “The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.” -Edmund Burke, Speech at Country Meeting of Buckinghamshire, 1784 |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
NOPE, she has an 8" gun. Not a 38. She said "self gratification. And was misquoted as "self defense". When San Fran Willy got too old, she got this. https://www.bing.com/images/search?v...vt=0&eim=1,2,6 Last edited by pacrat; 04-14-2019 at 7:39 PM.. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
All kidding aside, how could anyone even know the answer to the OP's question?
It flys in the face of logic that it could be answered by anyone other than the NSA. But perhaps he was just asking for opinions...in which case, you know what they say about opinions 😁 |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
Everyone can claim they assembled or purchased magazines.
It instantly makes everything you own legal.
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall "“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamala Harris Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
^^^^. This!
__________________
?The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not a ?second-class right,? subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.? ?.. "We know of no other constitutional rights that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need." - Justice Clarence Thomas |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
None. And that's the honest truth. Didn't see much upside to it Vs the downside.
IE; if the 9th overturns Benitez's ruling and Prop 63 becomes enforceable again. Then I'm stuck with mags that are illegal to possess. No thanks, I'll wait if and until the sh*tty thing is flushed down the toilet for good. |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall "“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamala Harris Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
How Many Here Bought High Cap Mags?
Lol..... Nice try ATF!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it." - Daniel Webster |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
You no longer can plausibly claim you have mags that were made legal during the period.
Those that have not asserted they did not buy or manufacture any magazines can plausibly claim they were manufactured or purchased during that time period, and there is no way to prove otherwise.
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall "“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamala Harris Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Pretty sure the ATF doesn't care about standard capacity magazines in CA.
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall "“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamala Harris Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I keep most of my things there, can buy what I want there, and it stays there. I don't mind being limited to 10 rounds mags when I'm in Ca. I mean that, I do not feel under armed when I'm in Ca.. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|