Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > FIREARMS DISCUSSIONS > Centerfire Rifles - Manually Operated
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Centerfire Rifles - Manually Operated Lever action, bolt action or other non gas operated centerfire rifles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-04-2019, 9:13 AM
NorCalFocus's Avatar
NorCalFocus NorCalFocus is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 3,914
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default Why buy cheap rifles for hunting?

I'm just curious, often times I see post on here about "its just a cheap hunting rifle", "you don't need a rifle over $XXX for a hunting rifle", or some version of that.

My counter argument to that is, why bet all the time and money you invest into a hunt on a $300 rifle? So lets add up the cost for a deer hunt...
License $60
Tag $50
Gas to drive a few hundred miles to hunt $200-$300
Ammo for practice and hunt $80
Food for 3-4 days $50-$75
Time off work, vacation days

This is the low end. The cost goes way up if your hauling a camper, have a side by side, want alcohol to drink at night, need new gear like boots or a pack, pay a trespass/gate fee etc. We all know you can drop a thousand or more easily towards a basic deer hunt. Then the cost sky rockets if your going out of state or you use a guide. If you built points for 5 years, your license cost and tag application fees are 5 times higher than the guy that draws year one.

My time in the back country is valuable to me. I can't see making all that hinge of a $300 rifle and $200 scope. Even more so when you don't get a chance to go every year. I'm not saying everyone needs a custom $3000 rifle to hunt, but why is it okay to have the cheapest rifle possible? I want a rifle that shoots 1/2 MOA all day. Because when the times comes, I may be a 1 MOA shooter at best. Knowing my rifle isn't going to be a problem is huge for me.

Someone tell me why I'm wrong. Because I'd love to save some money.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-04-2019, 9:40 AM
Inquirer's Avatar
Inquirer Inquirer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Back in Los Angeles!
Posts: 986
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

... K.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-04-2019, 10:04 AM
rsrocket1 rsrocket1 is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sacramento no more
Posts: 2,723
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

It all depends on your application. Around the country, many deer are taken at less than 100 yards, sometimes closer to 50 yards. Does Bubba down south or Taaad up in the midwest require a 1/2 MOA gun? Probably not.

When hunting billy goats in big sky country, many shots are taken at a couple hundred yards, maybe more. Would you want a gun with the equivalent accuracy of a smoothbore musket? Probably not.

It all depends on the application. By the way, when you factor in the cost of your trip, what is the price per pound of that venison sausage?

Answer: priceless
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-04-2019, 10:05 AM
elk hunter elk hunter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,085
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Even on pack in hunting more game is killed at or under 100 yards than at or over 1,000 yards. How much accuracy do you need to shoot a deer or elk at 75 yards, you tell me. Everyone has their own personal preferences and standards unless someone else gave you your preferences and standards. Just because someone else told you you have to have X Y or Z to hunt doesn't make it set in stone, both ways. Actually I think your way out on the low end for a custom hunting rifle but that's my idea. Cheap guns can and do work all the time and expensive ones can fail, it's a toss. After all it's your time and money spend it as you wish. I will not do what some do all the time and that is tell you you have to have this or that to enjoy hunting or experience success in it's different states. You sound like your trying to convince yourself of something although I am not sure what it is. HTH
Regards
elk hunter

Last edited by elk hunter; 04-04-2019 at 10:07 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-04-2019, 10:10 AM
ECG_88's Avatar
ECG_88 ECG_88 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 718
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

are you saying that the average $300 bolt action rifle is not capable of 1 to 2 MOA? Also are most people really capable of shooting better than 4 MOA in a field condition? I know a lot of people can shoot 1 MOA at the bench, but I'm talking about off hand or braced against a tree like in typical hunting scenarios.

Take for example a Savage Axis as a budget model hunting rifle. Comes with a scope from Dicks for $349. Doesn't even come with acccutriger or the accu bedding. Still capable of hitting 12 inch target from 300 yards.

That should be enough for hunting at the typical range of 100 to 300 yards, especially if you are on a budget. If you can afford better/nicer, then fine I don't care. I just don't think a budget rifle should be dismissed from being used by someone with limited funds.
__________________
Emotional appeal is a marketing tactic and not a foundation for effective argument.

Nulla Fatere, Omnia Nega, Accusatorem Accusa
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-04-2019, 10:16 AM
roostersgt roostersgt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: 5200'
Posts: 1,921
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

I own several rifles, of all price points. The rifles one can now get for $300ish are incredible values. My T/C Compass rifles are sub MOA right out of the box. With a decent scope I have less than $500 in each of them. They shoot better, or at least as well as my other far more expensive rifles. I took two "cheap" rifles with me last year on our annual Wyoming hunting trip for two weeks. Rain, snow and mud didn't seem to bother them and they held zero for the two animals I had tags for.

For the money they can't be beat, plus they have lifetime warranties and are guaranteed to be sub MOA with premium ammunition. I hand load and have found their claim to be true.

Last edited by roostersgt; 04-04-2019 at 10:18 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-04-2019, 10:31 AM
H8Mud's Avatar
H8Mud H8Mud is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 458
iTrader: 26 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCalFocus View Post
I'm just curious, often times I see post on here about "its just a cheap hunting rifle", "you don't need a rifle over $XXX for a hunting rifle", or some version of that.

My counter argument to that is, why bet all the time and money you invest into a hunt on a $300 rifle? So lets add up the cost for a deer hunt...
License $60
Tag $50
Gas to drive a few hundred miles to hunt $200-$300
Ammo for practice and hunt $80
Food for 3-4 days $50-$75
Time off work, vacation days

This is the low end. The cost goes way up if your hauling a camper, have a side by side, want alcohol to drink at night, need new gear like boots or a pack, pay a trespass/gate fee etc. We all know you can drop a thousand or more easily towards a basic deer hunt. Then the cost sky rockets if your going out of state or you use a guide. If you built points for 5 years, your license cost and tag application fees are 5 times higher than the guy that draws year one.

My time in the back country is valuable to me. I can't see making all that hinge of a $300 rifle and $200 scope. Even more so when you don't get a chance to go every year. I'm not saying everyone needs a custom $3000 rifle to hunt, but why is it okay to have the cheapest rifle possible? I want a rifle that shoots 1/2 MOA all day. Because when the times comes, I may be a 1 MOA shooter at best. Knowing my rifle isn't going to be a problem is huge for me.

Someone tell me why I'm wrong. Because I'd love to save some money.
Your numbers are way inflated bud.

Resident hunt license- 49.00 (rounded up)
Resident deer tag 1st 32.00 (rounded up)
Gas for 200 mile round trip at 15 mpg 86.00 (rounded up)
Ammo- 50 bux max for 20 rounds of non lead premium ammo (rounded up)
Time off work is moot, use your vacation time, that's what its for.

Just pointing out your numbers are highly inflated to prove your point.
__________________
"Better to be judged by twelve than carried by six"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manofmayhem View Post
Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-04-2019, 10:40 AM
Divernhunter Divernhunter is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Denair, Ca
Posts: 8,741
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

I have "cheap" rifles($300-400 without scope) and I have expensive rifles($2200-5000+).
The cheap ones shoot excellent and sometimes better than my middle of the cost rifles.
One thing I do is ALWAYS put a Leupold on any hunting rifle/pistol. Doing so makes me know that no matter the weather and such I will not need to worry about the scope.
I have more of a problem with people using cheap, less reliable scopes and poor choice of ammo for hunting than I do the cost of the rifle. Some people pick bullets completely unsuitable for hunting the game they are after. They do not understand that the bullet is the ONLY part that touches the animal and the cheapest part of the hunt even if it was $5+ per round. Also bullet choice or cartridge should not be for best case situations but it should be for the worse case situation you may get at shot at the animal of your choice.

"Cheap" rifles generally shoot well and often better than the shooter can do. I see it often at the range. "I think" the more important thing is people who 1)pick a cheap scope or one with a bunch of adjustments needed to shoot 2) pick an unsuitable bullet choice(show more respect to the animal that you are trying to kill quickly/cleanly) 3) pick a cartridge not suitable for the hunting you are doing in the worse case situation.

So OP I will tell you that you are partly wrong. You are wrong about the rifle. You did not talk about the scope or ammo or cartridge selection which is actually more important. That is were I find the most fault.

PS the ammo/cartridge part is even more important now that we must use non-lead ammo. far too many select too heavy a bullet going too slow.
__________________
A 30cal will reach out and touch them. A 50cal will kick their butt.
NRA Life Member, NRA certified RSO & Basic Pistol Instructor, Hunter, shooter, reloader
SCI, Manteca Sportsmen Club, Coalinga Rifle Club, Escalon Sportsmans Club, Waterford Sportsman Club & NAHA Member, Madison Society member

Last edited by Divernhunter; 04-04-2019 at 10:43 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-04-2019, 10:48 AM
NorCalFocus's Avatar
NorCalFocus NorCalFocus is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 3,914
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Divernhunter View Post
I have "cheap" rifles($300-400 without scope) and I have expensive rifles($2200-5000+).
The cheap ones shoot excellent and sometimes better than my middle of the cost rifles.
One thing I do is ALWAYS put a Leupold on any hunting rifle/pistol. Doing so makes me know that no matter the weather and such I will not need to worry about the scope.
I have more of a problem with people using cheap, less reliable scopes and poor choice of ammo for hunting than I do the cost of the rifle. Some people pick bullets completely unsuitable for hunting the game they are after. They do not understand that the bullet is the ONLY part that touches the animal and the cheapest part of the hunt even if it was $5+ per round. Also bullet choice or cartridge should not be for best case situations but it should be for the worse case situation you may get at shot at the animal of your choice.

"Cheap" rifles generally shoot well and often better than the shooter can do. I see it often at the range. "I think" the more important thing is people who 1)pick a cheap scope or one with a bunch of adjustments needed to shoot 2) pick an unsuitable bullet choice(show more respect to the animal that you are trying to kill quickly/cleanly) 3) pick a cartridge not suitable for the hunting you are doing in the worse case situation.

So OP I will tell you that you are partly wrong. You are wrong about the rifle. You did not talk about the scope or ammo or cartridge selection which is actually more important. That is were I find the most fault.

PS the ammo/cartridge part is even more important now that we must use non-lead ammo. far too many select too heavy a bullet going too slow.
Yes I did day cheap rifles, but the premise applies to everything, like you said scopes and ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-04-2019, 10:53 AM
NorCalFocus's Avatar
NorCalFocus NorCalFocus is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 3,914
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H8Mud View Post
Your numbers are way inflated bud.

Resident hunt license- 49.00 (rounded up)
Resident deer tag 1st 32.00 (rounded up)
Gas for 200 mile round trip at 15 mpg 86.00 (rounded up)
Ammo- 50 bux max for 20 rounds of non lead premium ammo (rounded up)
Time off work is moot, use your vacation time, that's what its for.

Just pointing out your numbers are highly inflated to prove your point.
I took a stab at a few of the numbers. A license for me is $60 and a deer tag is $45, so thats where I pulled those from. Its been sometime since I've had a CA license and tag.

Gas I just went off of what I know I usally spend. But its also depends on distance. If you live in LA or SF and drive into the X zones, your well past a 200 round trip.

On the ammo, just 20 rounds for practice, sight in and hunt? Don't you think and ethical hunter owes more to the animal than that?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-04-2019, 10:59 AM
NorCalFocus's Avatar
NorCalFocus NorCalFocus is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 3,914
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

I'm not here trying to prove my point to anyone, just curious as to why people in general go cheap in this area. Go up into the D zones during deer season, guys have $60,000 4x4's, $20,000 side by sides, a camper, and a bargin box store rifle.

Then you take guys that say that they can't afford more than $400 on a rifle (scope, or other important item), yet they have a iPhone with a $100/month plan, eat out 4 nights a week, have a new car. Yeah that isn't everyone and some guys really do live on a budget that only allows them to spend the bare minimum.

I guess my point is more on why this mindset of "good enough" vs "get the best you can really afford".
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-04-2019, 11:11 AM
H8Mud's Avatar
H8Mud H8Mud is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 458
iTrader: 26 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCalFocus View Post
I'm not here trying to prove my point to anyone, just curious as to why people in general go cheap in this area. Go up into the D zones during deer season, guys have $60,000 4x4's, $20,000 side by sides, a camper, and a bargin box store rifle.

Then you take guys that say that they can't afford more than $400 on a rifle (scope, or other important item), yet they have a iPhone with a $100/month plan, eat out 4 nights a week, have a new car. Yeah that isn't everyone and some guys really do live on a budget that only allows them to spend the bare minimum.

I guess my point is more on why this mindset of "good enough" vs "get the best you can really afford".
I would guess that the market has far more bargain setups than it does premium rifles. For me anyway, my hunting rifles are tools and get their fair share of use/abuse during the hunt. Rifles get banged on trees, rocks, boats, trucks, blinds, raised and lowered from tree stands into the dirt. I have 1 really nice bling 7mm rem mag I use on special hunts. It only comes along on very particular hunts, then I have some "tupperwear" stocked guns that go everywhere and have all the "love" marks of a tool. I've hunted with free rifles and shotguns that were total junk, and I've hunted with some premium custom builds. The rifle doesnt dictate a hunts success, the hunter does.
__________________
"Better to be judged by twelve than carried by six"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manofmayhem View Post
Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-04-2019, 11:13 AM
elk hunter elk hunter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,085
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

OK, got it. But your pointing out something here, yes some guy's will do just what you describe. Does that make them any less of a dedicated hunter than the guy that's packing a 6,500.00 rifle driving a old Toyoda pickup and sleeping in a tent? What your seeing is what makes things interesting at least to me. Different ideas and different values. I'm sure I'm a lot different than you, a good thing.....no? I think yes. It's much more interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-04-2019, 11:18 AM
NorCalFocus's Avatar
NorCalFocus NorCalFocus is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 3,914
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elk hunter View Post
OK, got it. But your pointing out something here, yes some guy's will do just what you describe. Does that make them any less of a dedicated hunter than the guy that's packing a 6,500.00 rifle driving a old Toyoda pickup and sleeping in a tent? What your seeing is what makes things interesting at least to me. Different ideas and different values. I'm sure I'm a lot different than you, a good thing.....no? I think yes. It's much more interesting.
No it doesn't make anyone more dedicated or less successful. I just find it interesting is all. Yeah being different is good.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-04-2019, 11:28 AM
elk hunter elk hunter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,085
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Ahhh yes, interesting. Just for the kicks of it I'll tell you a little about me. I drive a 09 Toyoda Tacoma, and at least right now I still have a Grizzly 660 if I need it and yep I do have a tent but don't object one bit to a nice warm motel room when it's down around 0, yep I'm getting to be a woosie in my old age. But that isn't what most would call "high dollar" but to me it's all good. My firearms are something of what most would call lower end to mid range. I demand reliability and accuracy first and foremost to any other part of it. I bet I got more campfire stories than you do LOL Enjoy your hunting, I know I will.
Regards
elk hunter
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-04-2019, 11:33 AM
sd joe sd joe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 767
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

I bet the great majority of animals are shot with “cheap rifles”. From Walmart combos to pawn shop beaters. Most great hunting areas are low income areas.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-04-2019, 11:35 AM
SMarquez SMarquez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,209
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

On a dirt bike q&a video, someone asked what to spend $300 on to go faster. The answer was buy $300 worth of gas for the bike. Same thing here, buy $300 worth of ammo and learn everything you can about your rifle. Big box bargain or custom. My Tikka T3 shoots as well as it's uppity cousin, the Sako. My FIL built his hunting rifle out of a $3 Arisaka, hand picked from a barrel at a Western Auto in the early 50's. He was a fine shot and very rarely missed with open sights and some hand loaded 300 Savage ammo. I would say spend smart on glass and rings/mounts.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-04-2019, 11:37 AM
Calif Hunter's Avatar
Calif Hunter Calif Hunter is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Apple Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 3,096
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

As others have pointed out, many of the bargain rifles now being produced are more accurate than the classic rifles of 20 or more years ago. Ruger Americans, TC Compass, Savages, etc shoot close to or better than MOA and are certainly accurate enough to hunt big game with. My go to hunting rifles are a .243 Tikka T-3 Lite, another one in .300 Win, a Howa .270 and a 1903 Springfield sporterized .30-06 with the original barrel that shoots handloads into 5/8 to 3/4 inch. My varmint rifles run the gamut from a Cooper .204, Kimber Longmaster .22-250, a CZ 527 American in .223, a Savage 110 .223 (old model 4x4) to a CZ Varmint in .17 HMR. All of those centerfires shoot 1/2 inch. The CZ 17 shoots about 3/4 inch with CCI green ammo.

So while I value a high dollars rifle, I use what shoots well and put good scopes on them.

Last edited by Calif Hunter; 04-04-2019 at 11:39 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-04-2019, 11:47 AM
Jwalt Jwalt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 551
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Light, dependable, highly accurate and under 400.... why spend more for a rifle that’s usually worse at the job?

For all our care and caution there’s a reason we never take a loaded rifle up into a tree stand. It might fall or we might.

Other hunters have ribed me for babying my rifles, but there’s still much more chance of damage in the field than at the range.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-04-2019, 11:51 AM
Jeepergeo's Avatar
Jeepergeo Jeepergeo is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Arcata
Posts: 3,485
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Bottom line. The Ruger American and Remington budget line of rifles out the last 5 to 10 years are far more capable than most hunters truly shooting within their capabilities. Spending 2X or 3X more on the gun and optics will not increase the chance of success of most hunters.

That all said, buy a gun that you like and can manage out to about 1.5X to 2X your anticipated shot distance, buy some ammo and get to the range and practice, practice, practice.
__________________
Benefactor Life Member, National Rifle Association
Life Member, California Rifle and Pistol Association

Last edited by Jeepergeo; 04-04-2019 at 12:15 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-04-2019, 11:56 AM
Whiskey_Tango's Avatar
Whiskey_Tango Whiskey_Tango is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PRK
Posts: 1,591
iTrader: 28 / 100%
Default

My $350 Ruger American Predator in 6.5 Creed shoots 1/2 MOA with factory ammo. Should it be tighter for deer hunting?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-04-2019, 12:13 PM
NorCalFocus's Avatar
NorCalFocus NorCalFocus is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 3,914
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whiskey_Tango View Post
My $350 Ruger American Predator in 6.5 Creed shoots 1/2 MOA with factory ammo. Should it be tighter for deer hunting?
I have to say that the Ruger American rifles shoot surprising well for their cost. I do want to ask, why did you choose the Ruger American? What was it about that rifle that made you buy it?

And no you don't need more than a 1/2 MOA rifle. I'm here just having a discussion with y'all.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-04-2019, 12:16 PM
Kwikvette's Avatar
Kwikvette Kwikvette is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Fresno County
Posts: 3,704
iTrader: 49 / 100%
Default

You really don't shoot with many people do you?

The trend I've seen with people asking about a 'cheap' rifle for hunting is they're either just getting into hunting, or shooing in general.

You won't tell someone buying their first hand gun to buy a CZ Tactical Sport Orange would you? Maybe those that live vicariously through others would but I know and have shot with plenty of people that have nice rifles just for hunting, custom guns even. Just because they don't post about it here doesn't mean they don't exist
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by longrange1 View Post
my gun shoots better with shiny brass...plus not only does the shiny brass make me look like a pimp at the range if the sun catches it just right it blinds the guy next to me which improves my odds of winning the match.
Quote:
Originally Posted by XDJYo View Post
Full size. Stubbies are for sissies.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-04-2019, 12:22 PM
NorCalFocus's Avatar
NorCalFocus NorCalFocus is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 3,914
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H8Mud View Post
I would guess that the market has far more bargain setups than it does premium rifles. For me anyway, my hunting rifles are tools and get their fair share of use/abuse during the hunt. Rifles get banged on trees, rocks, boats, trucks, blinds, raised and lowered from tree stands into the dirt.
So question this, because I do see the point of rifles being tools and you certainly don't feel bad beating up a lower cost rifle vs a high end custom. Where most low cost rifles save money are the stock, trigger, and scope, agreed?

So whats more likely to take the abuse of the rifle being dropped, banged on rocks, and extreme weather changes? A tupperware plastic stock or a $800 McMillan? A $200 Nikon/Vortex/Tasco or a $1800 Nightforce? A factory trigger or a $120 Timney or Trigger Tech?

Either way, things break down and having a back up is needed.

Last edited by NorCalFocus; 04-04-2019 at 12:38 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-04-2019, 12:22 PM
Dirtlaw Dirtlaw is offline
CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: OC
Posts: 3,456
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elk hunter View Post
OK, got it. But your pointing out something here, yes some guy's will do just what you describe. Does that make them any less of a dedicated hunter than the guy that's packing a 6,500.00 rifle driving a old Toyoda pickup and sleeping in a tent? What your seeing is what makes things interesting at least to me. Different ideas and different values. I'm sure I'm a lot different than you, a good thing.....no? I think yes. It's much more interesting.

This.



The objective is enjoyment or some other feeling you seek (or to put food in your mouth). How you get there isn't important (as long as it's ethical).
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-04-2019, 12:28 PM
NorCalFocus's Avatar
NorCalFocus NorCalFocus is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 3,914
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwikvette View Post
You really don't shoot with many people do you?

The trend I've seen with people asking about a 'cheap' rifle for hunting is they're either just getting into hunting, or shooing in general.

You won't tell someone buying their first hand gun to buy a CZ Tactical Sport Orange would you? Maybe those that live vicariously through others would but I know and have shot with plenty of people that have nice rifles just for hunting, custom guns even. Just because they don't post about it here doesn't mean they don't exist
I shoot with plenty of people. A few them also have custom rifles or highly upgraded rifles. I also do know people that share mindset exist and that hunt with custom rifles and high dollar glass. I learned this mindset from others that share it.

I just see the trend here on Calguns mostly that "this is good enough". I totally get not dropping $1000 on a rifle getting into hunting or shooting.

I may just be on my own on this one. Thats cool.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-04-2019, 12:44 PM
elk hunter elk hunter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,085
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCalFocus View Post
So question this, because I do see the point of rifles being tools and you certainaly don't feel bad eating up a lower cost rifle vs a high end custom. Where most low cost rifles save money are the stock, trigger, and scope, agreed?

So whats more likely to take the abuse of the rifle being dropped, banged on rocks, and extreme weather changes? A tupperware plastic stock or a $800 McMillan? A $200 Nikon/Vortex/Tasco or a $1800 Nightforce? A factory trigger or a $120 Timney or Trigger Tech?

Either way, things break down and having a back up is needed.
I hope you or others don't mind me jumping in on this a little more. The trigger part is more than interesting to me. Have you ever looked at a Mauser military trigger and a Winchester Mod 70 trigger? If you have not you should they are both simple and reliable beyond belief. The Winchester Mod 70 triggers are pretty much the same as the Mauser only they are adjustable and can be tuned to a fine trigger pull almost second to none. Like the Mauser the Winchester is as rugged as they come and I would argue that part. They both cost far less than the fancy triggers. Timney is good to but I do not believe they could take the use or abuse of the other 2. My 91 Mauser still has it's original trigger it's still working almost 100 years later. You want rugged? right there it is. I don't care what price gun you hunt with if you really get out there and work through it your going to do some wear, dings and scratches to a gun no matter how careful you are. It's just going to happen. Never judge a book by it's cover. HTH
Regards
elk hunter
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-04-2019, 1:27 PM
Whiskey_Tango's Avatar
Whiskey_Tango Whiskey_Tango is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PRK
Posts: 1,591
iTrader: 28 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NorCalFocus View Post
I have to say that the Ruger American rifles shoot surprising well for their cost. I do want to ask, why did you choose the Ruger American? What was it about that rifle that made you buy it?

And no you don't need more than a 1/2 MOA rifle. I'm here just having a discussion with y'all.
Evidence of accuracy on YouTube and diminishing returns on any other sub $1k rifle. Plus if I were jammed up by a fish cop for some BS I wouldn't lose any sleep over it being confiscated.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-04-2019, 1:28 PM
Calif Hunter's Avatar
Calif Hunter Calif Hunter is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Apple Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 3,096
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

My buddy, who does way more hunting than most, only has custom rifles with high dollar scopes. He has lots of money and doesn't mind spending it on hunting trips and the guns he uses. He makes multiple trips out of country and many all over the US and Canada. He has a 4000 square foot trophy room including the Big 5, a sheep Grand Slam, Turkey Grand Slam and many record book class bucks, bulls, rams, bear, etc.

It is all relative. He uses his guns hard and feels the quality is worth it given the money he spends on the hunts and the reliability he gets from his equipment.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-04-2019, 3:58 PM
DrewN DrewN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,824
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

On the ammo, just 20 rounds for practice, sight in and hunt? Don't you think and ethical hunter owes more to the animal than that?
Reply With Quote


20 rounds of ammo is at least 5 seasons worth. My rifle holds zero just fine for the 51 weeks a year it sits in the safe.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 04-04-2019, 4:30 PM
Humboldt Leatherneck's Avatar
Humboldt Leatherneck Humboldt Leatherneck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Up in the hills, above the beach in the foggy redwoods
Posts: 433
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I still have the first .30 caliber rifle I learned to hunt Deer with many decades ago in Michigan - a Sporterized 1903 Springfield in .30-06 that my Dad paid around $40 dollars for almost 50 years ago. I have also hunted deer with my 1903A3 Springfield, M1 Garand, and Savage 110 all chambered in .30-06. Plus a couple of my el-cheapo Mosin-Nagants (91-30 and M-44) chambered in 7.62X54R.

Of course I live in Ca Deer Hunting area B-1, with large racked Black Tail Bucks right outside the house. Heck, I could probably kill one with a croquet mallet, or a pellet rifle - if so inclined. Maybe I should just open the window, remove the screen, and hunt deer from the comfort of my Lazy-Boy recliner?









Otherwise I could drive about an hour east of here, and be on public lands within Six Rivers Nat'l Forest to go hunting with the weekend warriors...

So lets see my costs of deer hunting on the very remote property here....

Fuel costs - zero dollars

Lead Free ammunition - I will have to go buy some in .30-06 and 7.62X54mm which is required after July 1, 2019 in all of California.

Deer tags of course

No 4 wheeler needed

I can camp somewhere on the 80 acres of timber for free

My local shooting distances in heavy timber do not require optics, plus I can still hit targets out to past 400 yards using iron open sights... Yet I do own a few rifles with scopes/ optics, that I bought used at a cheap for me price with them already attached.

My idea of a perfect firearm big game hunting experience is way different than the OPs opinion!
__________________
Member of the N.R.A., Marine Corps League, and American Legion.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-04-2019, 4:32 PM
LynnJr LynnJr is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 7,911
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

NorCalFocus
Take a look at the California hunter success rate and what you will quickly notice is the average hunter kills a buck every 15 years.
I would imagine that hunter wears the latest greatest gear and has an expensive truck that gets waxed before he brings it home and goes out each Saturday around 9-10 AM.

The guys killing two bucks a year consistently know what they are doing already and have it all dialed in.
__________________
Lynn Dragoman, Jr.
Southwest Regional Director
Unlimited Range Shooters Association (URSA)
www.unlimitedrange.org
Not a commercial business.
URSA - Competition starts at 2000 yards!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-04-2019, 5:38 PM
MissiontoMars MissiontoMars is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,546
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

One train of thought is to spend no more than you need for a rifle. Just like buying a hammer or a tape measure.

One train of thought is to engage in a past-time or hobby where the embellishments increase the satisfaction involved, while usually improving or at least not, degrading the gun’s utility.

Different strokes for different folks.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-04-2019, 6:12 PM
plumbum's Avatar
plumbum plumbum is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Tuh-hay-muh
Posts: 5,327
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

... srsly?

So I can have a rifle in each caliber, duh!

But honestly, my .30-06 was $249, and damn if it doesn’t shoot as good as a $999 rifle (the operator is a different story tho... )
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ysr_racer View Post
Please don't bring logic and reason into an interwebs discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by krypto99 View Post
Please stop using logic and reason.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-04-2019, 7:05 PM
Tehjosheh's Avatar
Tehjosheh Tehjosheh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: N/A
Posts: 935
iTrader: 29 / 100%
Default

Suppose you budget $600 for a rifle and scope. Which do you think would make you more accurate, a $600 rifle or $300 rifle with $300 in training?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-04-2019, 7:37 PM
Spyder's Avatar
Spyder Spyder is offline
Honorary MLC
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In a shack, in the woods
Posts: 16,068
iTrader: 126 / 100%
Default

I hunt with a homemade AK and a Mosin Nagant sometimes.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-04-2019, 8:19 PM
EMP3 EMP3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 343
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

It's a wise idea to buy the best quality rifle you can afford for big game hunting.

I hunt the Rockies exclusively. A guided hunt can be well over 10k. A DIY mule deer hunt is about 3k.

But money ain't the only problem. Our deer camp is 35 miles from the nearest town. I'd have to drive about 150 miles to have a rifle repaired. Worse, I'd hate to be deep in Rockies wilderness with a rifle that won't shoot.

For many years, I've hunted with a Model 700. It was my only big game rifle for many seasons. That rifle has never, ever failed me. I've picked up a couple Sakos along the way. I have complete faith in all of my big game rifles. I'll take only one this year.

I've heard the Remington's quality control has plummeted. I hope it ain't true.

The recently introduced Sauer 100, made in Germany, is worth a long look.

You'll not go wrong with Sako. Believe me, Sako is worth its premium.

Save longer or sell stuff you don't need. Always buy the best quality big game rifle you can afford.

I'd rather buy good quality used than lesser quality new.

Last edited by EMP3; 04-04-2019 at 8:25 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-04-2019, 8:20 PM
EMP3 EMP3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 343
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tehjosheh View Post
Suppose you budget $600 for a rifle and scope. Which do you think would make you more accurate, a $600 rifle or $300 rifle with $300 in training?

Neither.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-04-2019, 9:03 PM
scotty99 scotty99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Newbury Park
Posts: 1,184
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default

Ever been on a hunt with a guy with a custom rifle or Blaser or something and he won’t get it wet or makes you hold it while he crosses a fence or scrambles up some rocks? That guy doesn’t get invited next year.

A gun is a tool. Spend enough so that it does it’s job and so you love it. A $3,000 rifle better shoot 1/2moa. But there is a special joy in something like the $350 Ruger American Predator I bought that can shoot 1/2moa too. And I don’t have to care when I put it in the bed of the truck, or lean it against a tree and have it fall.

We should all be grateful to live in a time of such great firearms and optics. For maybe $600 today, you can get a rifle and scope that was unobtainable at almost any price 25 years ago.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-04-2019, 11:03 PM
ar15barrels's Avatar
ar15barrels ar15barrels is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 56,410
iTrader: 119 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elk hunter View Post
Does that make them any less of a dedicated hunter than the guy that's packing a 6,500.00 rifle driving a old Toyoda pickup and sleeping in a tent?
Be nice to Lynn...
__________________
Randall Rausch

AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
Barrel, sight and trigger work on most pistols and shotguns.
Most work performed while-you-wait, evening and saturday appointments available.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 2:49 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy