Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > INTERESTS AND ACTIVITIES > Long Distance Shooting
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Long Distance Shooting Discuss tools, techniques, tips and theories of long distance shooting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-21-2021, 8:40 PM
Bmars06 Bmars06 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 165
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default 6.5 CM Ladder/OCW Test Advice

Greetings,

I'm looking for some expert eyes to give me their opinions on my ladder test I performed today for a new 6.5 CM load. Three pictures are attached of the targets, shot at 200 yards. There are three target papers, each with five small targets on them. The small targets are numbered 1-15 and have a three-shot group fired at each of them. Targets numbered 1-7 are with a Berger 140gr Match Hybrid Target projectile starting at 40.0 grains of powder and going up by .3 increments to 41.8 Targets numbered 8-15 are with a Hornady 140gr ELD-M projectile starting at 40.0 grains of powder and going up by .3 increments to 42.0. The powder charges and the overall spread of the group is written next to the individual target as well. I'm having a hard time discerning where the optimal charge weight (OCW) appears to be.... I appreciate any guidance/advice!

Here are the velocities of each projective/charge:

Berger 140gr Match Hybrid Target
40.0 Grains of powder
-2609
-2619
-2614

40.3 Grains
-2609
-2609
-2636

40.6 Grains
-2640
-2624
-2629

40.9 Grains
-2677
-2672
-2688

41.2 Grains
-2704
-2726
-2704

41.5 Grains
-2766
-2754
-2737

41.8 Grains
-2777
-2766
-2772

Hornady 140gr ELD-M
40.0 Grains of H4350
-2645
-2645
-2656

40.3 Grains
-2666
-2682
-2656

40.6 Grains
-2704
-2677
-2699

40.9 Grains
-2106—Must be a misread
-2109—Must be a misread
-2569

41.2 Grains
-2732
-2801
-2743

41.5 Grains
-2766
-2760
-2777

41.8 Grains
-2777
-2772
-2777

42.0 Grains
-2801
-2789
-2789
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2821.jpg (98.1 KB, 60 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_2822.jpg (93.3 KB, 48 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_2823.jpg (95.1 KB, 48 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-22-2021, 8:29 AM
ShaunBrady ShaunBrady is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 399
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Were the targets shot as the attachments present them, or rotated so the writing is up?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-22-2021, 8:32 AM
broadside's Avatar
broadside broadside is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,383
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

based on the images, you need to shoot more than 3 rounds per load, unless these are all fired from a well setup sled and it's not you as the shooter.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-22-2021, 8:57 AM
smoothy8500's Avatar
smoothy8500 smoothy8500 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 3,681
iTrader: 26 / 100%
Default

I'm assuming the pictures got rotated when posted? Regardless, what aspect of the OCW test are you looking for: Group center closest to POA? Flattest vertical dispersion? Plateau of elevation change with increasing charges? Velocity node? Your "test" is mixing Newberry's OCW, Satterlee, etc.

If you know that the vertical dispersion is not influenced by you, there are some groups where elevation change with charge, and the vertical dispersion of the group itself is fairly flat: 3&4, 9&10, 13&14.

Last edited by smoothy8500; 03-22-2021 at 9:05 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-22-2021, 10:32 AM
ar15barrels's Avatar
ar15barrels ar15barrels is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 56,434
iTrader: 119 / 100%
Default

Why do people call group testing "ladder testing"?

Shooting groups at varying charge levels does not create a ladder on the target.
It creates a bunch of groups.

Ladder testing is when you fire a sequence of single shots all at the same aiming point to create a "ladder" and then you look at the "rung" spacing to find the nodes.



Ladder testing is best done at 300yds or more to get better rung separation.
I did my ladders at 600yds with a spotter at the target so it was easy to mark the individual shots.
__________________
Randall Rausch

AR work: www.ar15barrels.com
Bolt actions: www.700barrels.com
Foreign Semi Autos: www.akbarrels.com
Barrel, sight and trigger work on most pistols and shotguns.
Most work performed while-you-wait, evening and saturday appointments available.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-22-2021, 10:57 AM
smoothy8500's Avatar
smoothy8500 smoothy8500 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 3,681
iTrader: 26 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ar15barrels View Post
Why do people call group testing "ladder testing"?
No kidding. There must be several of these quasi "laddergroup" questions per week here.

Last edited by smoothy8500; 03-22-2021 at 11:31 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-22-2021, 1:06 PM
Fjold's Avatar
Fjold Fjold is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Commonwealth of Kentucky
Posts: 22,315
iTrader: 29 / 100%
Default

Ladder testing is to see where different loads group closer together to locate particular "vibration nodes" of barrels where the barrel is more consistent. If you look at Randall's photo that barrel likes that particular bullet and powder combination near 30 grains.

You shoot one shot with a number of slightly larger amounts of powder at the same aiming point on the target and track where each individual bullet lands. The further the target is from you that you can shoot accurately, the better. Shooting a ladder correctly depends on your ability to hold an accurate aiming point at distance and you're ability to shoot consistently for every shot.

You need a second person behind the berm at the target, a remote camera or an electronic target to keep the bullet holes in order. You are looking for vertical position of each bullet more than the horizontal spread.

Where the barrel groups the slight differences in powder charges together tells you where to do the final load development. Sometimes you'll have two or more "nodes" where your barrel likes different powder levels/velocities.
__________________
Frank

One rifle, one planet, Holland's 375

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v214/Fjold/member8325.png

Life Member NRA, CRPA and SAF

Last edited by Fjold; 03-22-2021 at 1:18 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-22-2021, 1:30 PM
Bmars06 Bmars06 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 165
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Thank you guys for the info! This is definitely a fun learning experience!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-23-2021, 10:39 AM
p1choco p1choco is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 580
iTrader: 33 / 100%
Default

41.5-41.8 seems like you're close to a stable velocity node. I don't know what your brass prep is like and I don't know what you're doing for neck tension. Personally if pressure signs are good in that range of powder, I would ensure you're getting the best possible consistency in regards to neck tension. Then play with seating depth and see if you're groups tighten up. Just my 2 cents.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-23-2021, 10:48 AM
SmokeTheClay SmokeTheClay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 855
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmars06 View Post
Thank you guys for the info! This is definitely a fun learning experience!
Satterlee method is trash. Dont use it. 3 groups is in fact a good idea for a starting point. If this was virgin brass I'd retest it. Maybe make sure youre using a good rest.

Here is a good method to follow. Since you're using ELDs and Berger Hybrids, then you'll most likely need a bigger jump than .0200

https://forum.accurateshooter.com/th...yards.3814361/
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-23-2021, 10:52 AM
p1choco p1choco is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 580
iTrader: 33 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeTheClay View Post
Satterlee method is trash. Dont use it. 3 groups is in fact a good idea for a starting point. If this was virgin brass I'd retest it. Maybe make sure youre using a good rest.

Here is a good method to follow. Since you're using ELDs and Berger Hybrids, then you'll most likely need a bigger jump than .0200

https://forum.accurateshooter.com/th...yards.3814361/
Eww! Starting at Jam? What a horrible idea and a complete waste of components.

Edit: read Bergers manual or Glen Zedikers book. It's a source of good information if you're after precision. Also keep in mind magazine restrictions. Modern testing with "big" bullet jump is showing amazing results. I don't know what your information intake is but maybe it would be worth learning more before you start doing more.

Last edited by p1choco; 03-23-2021 at 10:59 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-23-2021, 11:08 AM
SmokeTheClay SmokeTheClay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 855
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p1choco View Post
Eww! Starting at Jam? What a horrible idea and a complete waste of components.

Edit: read Bergers manual or Glen Zedikers book. It's a source of good information if you're after precision. Also keep in mind magazine restrictions. Modern testing with "big" bullet jump is showing amazing results. I don't know what your information intake is but maybe it would be worth learning more before you start doing more.
Lol. You just slammed Erik Cortina. He'd probably wipe the floor with you with both eyes closed.

This is from 2014, and more suited to VLDs not hybrids or ELDs that like jump which is why I mentioned a bigger jump than .0200
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-23-2021, 11:43 AM
p1choco p1choco is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 580
iTrader: 33 / 100%
Default

Slammed? Hardly. It is older, albeit great info. I will admit, I may have jumped the gun on what discipline the op is shooting. For PRS I would be more inclined to use the Satterlee method. For F Class, Erik's method is what I pretty much used. My current experience and results drive my current loading process. The OP will find their way.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 6:32 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy