WHY no CRPA support...

[-hanko]

...in and for the case with Benitez and AR's?

[cheezedawg]

Probably because their Rupp case (already sitting on appeal in the 9th) is essentially the same, except Miller won in the district court and Rupp didn't.

[CA1958]

I read an article on CPRA website that said, basically, the lawsuits against the ammo background check and now the assault weapon ban are on hold until the Magazine Capacity lawsuit (Duncan, I believe) is decided by the 11-Judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. The article also stated the 9th circuit will be reviewing that case on June 22 (of this year!).

https://crpa.org/news/blogs/californ...or-gun-owners/

[pacrat]

Originally Posted by -hanko

...in and for the case with Benitez and AR's?

A better question would be;

"WHY DON'T SIDELINE SNIVELERS GET OFF THEIR DUFFS, AND SUPPORT CRPA?"
Instead of always complaining that CRPA doesn't do enough for those that do nothing!

https://crpa.org/news/blogs/californ...eid=440a84423e

CRPA’s efforts to overturn California’s magazine ban in Duncan and ammunition laws in Rhode are just two fronts in CRPA’s sophisticated legal campaign to defend the Second Amendment. Long before Miller, CRPA launched a direct challenge to California’s “assault weapon” ban that is already at the Ninth Circuit. That matter, Rupp v. Becerra, was filed in April 2017 and has been on appeal since August 2019.

The Rupp case is fully briefed and argued but is stayed at the Ninth Circuit pending resolution of Duncan. The Ninth Circuit panel of judges decided to essentially pause the case, because of the impact that the Duncan en banc rehearing (scheduled for June 22, 2021) may have on Second Amendment law in the Ninth Circuit.

Regardless, Rupp is ahead of Miller in the Ninth Circuit, challenges the same laws, involves the same legal issues, and has already been argued. So, while it is heartening to read another brilliant evisceration of California’s gun control regime penned by Judge Benitez, Miller will likely have little impact and will be caught up in the bottleneck of cases already waiting at the Ninth Circuit.

If you were an NRA/CRPA member, you wouldn't have to ask dumb questions. You would already know WTF is going on.

[-hanko]

Originally Posted by pacrat

A better question would be;

"WHY DON'T SIDELINE SNIVELERS GET OFF THEIR DUFFS, AND SUPPORT CRPA?"
Instead of always complaining that CRPA doesn't do enough for those that do nothing!

https://crpa.org/news/blogs/californ...eid=440a84423e

If you were an NRA/CRPA member, you wouldn't have to ask dumb questions. You would already know WTF is going on.

A better answer might be that I've been a member for quite a while, even after moving out of California.

I've not been "always complaining", though I really don't gaf as to your opinion.

Moronic post.

[pacrat]

Originally Posted by -hanko

A better answer might be that I've been a member for quite a while, even after moving out of California.

I've not been "always complaining", though I really don't gaf as to your opinion.

Moronic post.

So you claim to be a "member", yet with all the pertinent information available. [even to non members] Still you ask stupid leading questions.

Then have the audacity to call people that stay informed of the multiple 2A battles being fought for all Ca citizens benefit by the CRPA. Moronic.

Well, .... OK then.

[-hanko]

Originally Posted by pacrat

So you claim to be a "member", yet with all the pertinent information available. [even to non members] Still you ask stupid leading questions.

Then have the audacity to call people that stay informed of the multiple 2A battles being fought for all Ca citizens benefit by the CRPA. Moronic.

Well, .... OK then.

OK then. Although we contribute mightily to CRPA even after moving out of California ~ 20 years ago, I tend to give most of my time to 2nd Amendment issues in Idaho.

OK with you. If not, I still do not GAF.