Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism > Temp Post-Duncan Mag Forum
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-09-2019, 11:26 PM
curtisfong's Avatar
curtisfong curtisfong is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,062
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default "The government shall file a declaration establishing proof of such notice."

Quote:
2. Defendant Becerra shall provide, by personal service or otherwise, actual notice of this order to all law enforcement personnel who are responsible for implementing or enforcing the enjoined statute. The government shall file a declaration establishing proof of such notice.
Has anyone see any evidence at all that Becerra has complied with this court order? I don't recall him asking the judge to stay that portion. And I certainly don't recall Benitez staying that portion of his holding.

Can Becerra just ignore Benitez entirely until his appeal is heard and ruled on?
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall

"“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamela Harris

Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome

Last edited by curtisfong; 04-09-2019 at 11:29 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-09-2019, 11:40 PM
johnk518's Avatar
johnk518 johnk518 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: HB
Posts: 928
iTrader: 23 / 100%
Default

The losing party is responsible for filing the court orders. That's all that's saying.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-09-2019, 11:43 PM
curtisfong's Avatar
curtisfong curtisfong is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,062
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnk518 View Post
The losing party is responsible for filing the court orders. That's all that's saying.
No, that sort of holding generally reads differently. This one isn't asking Becerra to write a court order to himself (or the State). It is asking Becerra to file proof of compliance. That is a completely different animal.

I could be wrong, of course, I'm no lawyer.
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall

"“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamela Harris

Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-10-2019, 8:26 AM
InfringedInCalifornia's Avatar
InfringedInCalifornia InfringedInCalifornia is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Commiefornia
Posts: 102
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Wouldnt this requirement be on hold as the stay put the original ruling on hold? If the ruling is finalized then Basura has to follow through on this, but since it was stated he can hold off. Practically speaking, what exactly would he be communicating to the officers anyway? The purpose of the stay is to maintain the status quo while the courts continue to work this out.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-10-2019, 8:30 AM
RickD427's Avatar
RickD427 RickD427 is online now
CGN/CGSSA Contributor
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: King County
Posts: 6,249
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

Judge Benitez stayed the order requiring notification. His order of April 4th did not contain any notification requirement. At present, the AG don't gotta notify nobody of anything.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-10-2019, 1:17 PM
curtisfong's Avatar
curtisfong curtisfong is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,062
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickD427 View Post
Judge Benitez stayed the order requiring notification. His order of April 4th did not contain any notification requirement. At present, the AG don't gotta notify nobody of anything.
That is really sad.
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall

"“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamela Harris

Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-10-2019, 1:55 PM
furyous68 furyous68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 1,787
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickD427 View Post
Judge Benitez stayed the order requiring notification. His order of April 4th did not contain any notification requirement. At present, the AG don't gotta notify nobody of anything.
Except while the ruling was in force, AG made no such notifications. Notifications that could have been emailed, faxed, or over-nighted to every law enforcement agency within CA 24hrs after the ruling was made. He made no such notifications the entire week until Judge Benitez stayed his ruling pending appeal.
__________________
Quote:
95,000,000 people die each day in the U.S. from gun violence
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-10-2019, 1:56 PM
readysetgo's Avatar
readysetgo readysetgo is offline
Win win win win
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ventura County, Caught Between My Woman And My Pistol And My Chips
Posts: 8,503
iTrader: 42 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickD427 View Post
Judge Benitez stayed the order requiring notification. His order of April 4th did not contain any notification requirement. At present, the AG don't gotta notify nobody of anything.

So...he dindunuffin!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICommittee
Founder, President, CEO of the Committee of We "What We says goes"
Stand up and be counted, or lay down and be mounted... -Mac

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 1:08 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
Calguns.net and The Calguns Foundation have no affiliation and are in no way related to each other.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.