![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Calgunners in Service This forum is a place for our active duty and deployed members to share, request and have a bit of home where ever they are. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is likely a complete pipe dream, but how would one go about getting legislation change to allow NG/Reserves in CA to get a MAWP?
Here's the issue - with the roll out of TC 3-20.40, rifle qualification scores have plummeted. Most non-combat arms units' only range time is once a year during their annual qualification. Even with the new practice tables, it has not be sufficient to increase qualification numbers. It is frankly terrifying particularly since we are expecting Guardsmen to be ready to respond to civil disturbance missions at any time. We are in a sad state of affairs where Soldiers have to take readiness in their own hands. Specifically, we need Soldiers to be training outside of drill time on rifles that replicate their issued equipment, not rifles with disabled functionality. So, how do we accomplish this? Find state senators to sponsor legislation? Start a petition? Reach out to an advocacy group? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Needs to be legislative on the CA end.
With a (D) supermajority, anything that might be favorable to any gun owner is unlikely to get out of its first committee. .mil could order that such guns ARE necessary, and order commanders to so certify. Current military attitudes suggest that is also pretty unlikely. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Librarian.
It would be less gun owner legislation and more one of public safety. Does CA really want a significant number of Guardsman not qualified on their primary weapon system? The company level commanders I've informally talked to are pretty supportive - mainly because rifle qual rates directly affect them. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The far greater problem with personal range practice for the random NG/USAR soldier is not the weapon platform. You can practice all you want with a castrated AR15. Nothing is stopping you. I argue, if you put 50 rounds a week through an AR15 wearing all your gear and gasmask and figure out how shooting really works in those conditions you'd be head and shoulders above your peers.
Where the problem comes in is the course of fire, and being able to practice all the shooting positions and scenarios we are now evaluated for. Pretty much all your generic public ranges will only permit you to shoot from a bench. That's our problem. Not that you can't use a regular M16/M4. With weapons qualification plummeting doesn't change the fact that our shooting proficiency was still what it was. We didn't magically get any worse with our weapons, we merely now how bad we will be when placed in those scenarios. The challenge is, when in full battel, getting down on the sights for a proper sight picture before letting lose any shots. If one can do that, then generally the shots will be "good enough" for a passing score.
__________________
Before there was Polymer there was Accuracy. Last edited by Snoopy47; 10-11-2021 at 9:47 AM.. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Also, if you read the regulations for the new marksmanship standards:
1) Units with access to a simulator with the qualification tables/scenarios WILL NOT BE ISSUED TRAINING AMMUNITION. Now, I suppose saying a unit does or doesn't have access to a simulator is very subjective. So it's probably not hard for a unit commander to make the case they don't have the proper access to a simulator, trained operators, or there are scheduling conflicts. But, if it were still my command I'd bend over backwards to get simulator access so we can crank out a lot more qualification iterations and get valid scores uploaded into DTS. You can just keep going, and going, and going up to the last minute, run folks through again and again and again that didn't pass. No brass clean up, no lengthy delays between iterations clearing shooters and then controlling them back out to their lanes, no calling in a hot range, not screwing around with individual rifle problems etc... ***** The only thing that matters is getting current qualification scores in DTS. Those are simply key strokes on a computer, and to cover one's ***** make sure there are valid signed off score cards that support that, and to cover that level make sure the scores were earned in accordance with regulations, which in this case the path the least resistance is the simulator with approved scenario tables run by a trained operator.
__________________
Before there was Polymer there was Accuracy. Last edited by Snoopy47; 10-11-2021 at 9:56 AM.. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |