![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It has long been the policy here on CGN not to allow any advocating of illegal activity and to remove any admission of a crime. In light of recent events there has been an onslaught of posts doing just that. The staff has been discussing how to handle these posts and have left most of them alone. We understand the anguish and hurt that most of you are feeling right now and we are having the same feelings and struggling with the same decisions that each of you are having to face. We may have reached a crossroads where it is time to have some of these discussions even in the open. There may come a time where the site leadership decides not to allow the discussion of illegal activity but for the time being please consider the following:
Calguns.net is monitored by law enforcement including the California DOJ, local agencies, and the Feds. We know this without a doubt and have even been subpoenaed for records before in criminal investigations. Everything you post on CGN is public and visible to anyone that visits the site. Professing intent to break the law could potentially be used as PC for searches later on and subject yourself to attention/investigation by law enforcement. If you decide to make posts advocating illegal activity or expressing the intent to commit crimes, know that you do so at your own risk. CGN will respond to subpoena as we always have by deferring to our legal counsel's opinion on whether we have to comply or not; however we will not deliberately try to hide illegal activity. Further more, threats, even vague or hinted at, of violence have never and will never be acceptable. Any such conduct will be dealt with as deemed appropriate by CGN staff. We all have important decisions to make in the next few months. Make sure that you make them from an informed and well thought out position. Also remember these decisions can potentially have a significant impact on others in your lives'. Make sure you include those people in your decision.
__________________
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." ~Ben Franklin 159 Last edited by Librarian; 07-03-2016 at 9:15 PM.. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for letting people vent.
I would hope and humbly ask that IF the gov't comes along and subpoenas you to investigate particular Calguns users, you please consider announcing such events publicly, as Reason Magazine did when the feds tried to uncover a few commenters joking about feeding a federal judge into a wood chipper, Fargo-style AND tried to gag Reason Magazine about it: https://popehat.com/2015/06/08/depar...-at-reason-com Reason Mag. handled it really well. They cooperated with the feds as much as they had to and then blew the story up into national outrage over the quashing of free speech: http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...ason-magazine/ https://www.bloomberg.com/view/artic...on-free-speech http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed...628-story.html http://iwf.org/blog/2797386/First-Am...39;-Identities The gag order was found to be exceptionally flimsy: https://popehat.com/2015/07/09/what-...ifully-little/ As they say, "sunlight is the best disinfectant." Reason Mag. took a big gamble--they could've quietly gone along with the feds, which would have led to the feds coming back again and again for more info on users shooting the breeze in their comments section, but by blowing the whole thing wide open and garnering national support from liberals and conservatives alike, they sent a clear message to the feds that they'll have to be very careful and thorough the next time they come after a commenter. It seems like more and more of our justice system is becoming secret to the people--secret FISA courts, secret terrorist watchlists, secret gun owner databases, etc. We're losing control of our gov't bit by bit. Last edited by dchang0; 07-04-2016 at 4:15 AM.. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you, moderators at CALGUNS.
People get upset and sometimes speak out of anger and frustrations. Better to vent than actually commit a crime. I've seen members call out someone going overboard, which makes CALGUNS a very classy place that often self-moderates. But we all know that sometimes a thread needs to be locked. We appreciate the moderators and Admin of Calguns and trust your judgement. Thank you for all you do!
__________________
“If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on earth.” - Ronald Reagan |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As dchang0 said, Thank You. For some, this is the only place were we can vent with like-minded people.
Thank you for understanding CGN staff.
__________________
Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know you won't forget to Sticky this.
__________________
Better Way to Search CalGuns - https://www.google.com/cse/home?cx=0...78:pzxbzjzh1zk CA Bill Search - https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov California Rifle and Pistol Association - http://crpa.org/ Sacramento County Sheriff Concealed Carry Info - Search 'Concealed Weapons Permit Information Sacramento' Second Amendment Foundation - http://www.saf.org Animated US Map Showing Progress of Concealed Carry Laws 1986 to 2021 http://www.gun-nuttery.com/rtc.php |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was mentioned in another thread by another user, but bears repeating here:
Make the 2A forum accessible only by members who have a password. For years, it has never made sense that anybody in the public domain can see the 2A forums but the OT forums are private. Also, it's time everyone educate themselves on CalECPA (sb178) and what it means for their privacy. Surprisingly, it's something our legislators did that can actually protect our privacy. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Glad to see this. Some folks needed this info for their own good. I empathize with everyone's frustration and it's encouraging to see ideas. I'd just hate to see any of these statements used against someone down the road. I think it's great that you're letting most of these discussions spin for awhile and hopefully this sticky will help many of us.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
https://www.eff.org/cases/california...cy-act-calecpa |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Big brother is watching - but they're only looking for terrorists
![]() Thank you CGN staff. If CA hasnt become a complete Police State yet, then LE and Gvnmnt won't have any interest in the conversations being made here. On the other hand - we know where CA is heading... So never expect American Freedoms here.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
"RIGHT POWER!" ![]() ----------------------------- |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you to CalGuns staff for your tireless efforts on our behalf.
This is a welcome policy and an excellent warning. However, what we're seeing in recent trends by TPTB is ex post facto making what was legal yesterday illegal tomorrow and the First Amendment is as under assault as the Second. So, while I applaud the warning and the gesture, there really is nothing to stop an overreaching despotic regime from using what ever it deems "inappropriate" in order to further its agenda.
__________________
![]() This is the USA. We don't elect kings, we rebel against them! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you.
This should be stickied in all sub-forums so all will take note or as another poster above mentioned, PM to all members as an urgent message.
__________________
Les Baer 1911: Premier II w/1.5" Guarantee, Blued, No FCS, Combat Rear, F/O Front, Checkered MSH & SA Professional Double Diamond Grips Springfield Armory XD-45 4" Service Model Springfield Armory XD9 4" Service Model (wifes). M&P 15 (Mine) |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Bump
__________________
^^^The above is just an opinion. NRA Patron Member CRPA 5 yr Member "...which from their verbosity, their endless tautologies, their involutions of case within case, and parenthesis within parenthesis, and their multiplied efforts at certainty by saids and aforesaids, by ors and by ands, to make them more plain, do really render them more perplexed and incomprehensible, not only to common readers, but to lawyers themselves. " - Thomas Jefferson |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's a sticky - you don't need to bump it, it stays at the top.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
"RIGHT POWER!" ![]() ----------------------------- |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So when's the sticky for the Official Calguns Going Dark/ "Well, bye then." thread going to hit the screen? That's the one I'm waiting for. A nice opportunity to say goodbye is what would be nice right about now.
Last edited by jarhead714; 07-04-2016 at 11:03 AM.. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
When am I going to see Dragunov OLLs for sale?? |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Excellent advice. Thanks for letting us vent. I encourage anyone who remains on Calguns to follow the letter of the law.
__________________
RKBA Clock: soap box, ballot box, jury box, cartridge box (Say When!) Free Vespuchia! The future is dystopian |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
....actually, I can't think of anything to say that doesn't include profanity.... . |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When I open CGN there are no "stickies" shown. First thing I do is look at Subscribed Threads. After perusing them I open New Posts to see what else is going on. Then maybe I will go to threads that are under categories such as the 2A forums header. At no time are "stickies" shown. The only way I saw this thread was looking at New Posts. If this thread had not been shown in New Posts I would have never seen it. I suspect others do not see "stickies" either unless they go looking for them. Perhaps "stickies" should be shown no matter how you open GCN and have to be closed in order to view other threads.
__________________
^^^The above is just an opinion. NRA Patron Member CRPA 5 yr Member "...which from their verbosity, their endless tautologies, their involutions of case within case, and parenthesis within parenthesis, and their multiplied efforts at certainty by saids and aforesaids, by ors and by ands, to make them more plain, do really render them more perplexed and incomprehensible, not only to common readers, but to lawyers themselves. " - Thomas Jefferson Last edited by SWalt; 07-04-2016 at 11:34 AM.. Reason: clarity |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a question..may or may no be applicable here. I frequent another forum where there is a particular board that is not available to the general public...it is by "approval" only...in order to use the board you have to apply to the moderators who validate the user's identity , etc...I was only thinking that for items that often get discussed like new products that might aid in "compliance" with the new laws, etc, could be freely discussed without fear it is feeding "visitors" that are interested in trying to create legislation to block any efforts that might be presented to help "comply" with the law and still maintain our freedoms.
I know there are "visitors" on line all the time and the things that are often discussed openly have got to be fodder for their legislative efforts...one that comes to mind is the single shot exemption that was often touted and even bragged about on Calguns and I'm sure some of that bragging led to the legislation that altered the single shot exemption...if there was a "quiet" place for approved members to discuss things like that it might keep the trolls at bay.. Just a thought. I know the other board I mention had some serious problems with posts in the open forums and now the "approved only" board has allowed for an exchange without the general public being involved. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Good advice, thanks! And as a new member I appreciate the ability to discuss these important issues and will endeavor to do so in regard to the way it needs to work around here. I for one do not advocate for anyone to commit a crime. The tricky thing is that the gun laws here in California are like a greased pig. If being culpable of criminal action requires "mens rea" (a guilty mind). How does one not become a criminal when the moving yardstick becomes the "action" and not a guilty mind (a desire to violate the law)? In other words: you comply with the law, then they change the law and make you the criminal without any act on your part other than complying with the first law? The problem will always be the moving yardstick-- which is why the 2nd amendment was not designed to move in the first place. So if I 'don't move' is this omission equal to an action to cross that proverbial yardstick? Something we are all trying to figure out I guess. Thanks again. Great forum! Last edited by Lex Talionis; 07-04-2016 at 1:46 PM.. |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Why is it called a "work around"? How about a device that complies with the current law?
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Also, law enforcement will have no trouble sending in undercover officers into whatever forum they wish to get into. Spying is one thing they do really well, judging the actual threat of a person is not (as we see from the Orlando terrorist who was investigated twice by the FBI and let go = real threat; people joking about judges in woodchippers = not a real threat). Last edited by dchang0; 07-04-2016 at 4:41 PM.. |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with everyone that an opportunity to vent is a good idea. Kudos to the staff for dealing with a difficult choice during a difficult time.
__________________
![]() NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle & Refuse To Be A Victim Instructor American Marksman Training Group Visit our American Marksman Facebook Page Diamond Bar CCW Facebook Page ![]() NRA Memberships at Discounted fee |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Time to move to the Dark Web? Tor for everyone!
__________________
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials." — George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788 NRA Life Benefactor Member SAF Life Member CRPA Life Member |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, from now on CGN contributions in bitcoin
![]()
__________________
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." ~Ben Franklin 159 |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Because the law has not yet been implemented and there are 2 months left to "gut and amend" another Global Warming bill into another anti-2A bill that closes any compliance methods that have been discussed.
__________________
- Rich |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't think by law you are required to keep data. Seems to me, you can purge at will at a regular interval.
__________________
RKBA Clock: soap box, ballot box, jury box, cartridge box (Say When!) Free Vespuchia! The future is dystopian |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It would be illegal to purge after receiving a subpoena. Usually a subpoena is for all posts made by a given member or a group of members.
__________________
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." ~Ben Franklin 159 |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, guess you'd have to have someone fulltime for something like that. I work for a gov entity and we purge routinely. Or so I hear.
__________________
RKBA Clock: soap box, ballot box, jury box, cartridge box (Say When!) Free Vespuchia! The future is dystopian |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Edit... It could be the IRS too
__________________
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." ~Ben Franklin 159 Last edited by RANGER295; 07-05-2016 at 9:36 AM.. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sad that the feds are intently watching us post about being pissed off for our rights being trampled, meanwhile theres plenty of terrorists, drug/weapon/human traffickers, serial murderers and rapists out there that need to be stopped like 5 minutes ago. But no, lets spend our time on CG and see if we can get these gun nuts on a search warrant.
Makes me sick. Thanks CG staff for being honest.
__________________
Ban Idiots. Not Guns. |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Many years ago my brother in law, who was living with us, would use my computer to access calguns on my account. After I got banned I went back and read some of the posts and was pretty appalled. It would not have been very pleasant if he had attracted the attention of LE. It was just a coincidence that he died a short time later.
Moral of the story...secure your calguns account as you would your bank account if other people can access your computer. Your dog's life might depend on it. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |