![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The vast majority of folks here criticizing FFLs have no clue what it is like actually running one in CA.
Hell, they probably don't even have experience running a small business of any kind; make no mistake, it is like being behind enemy lines, entirely unarmed. Your entire day is often organized around avoiding any contact whatsoever with State officials.
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall "“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamala Harris Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are FFLs that do it right. I quote from the DOJ letter " The Department is required to make it's determination within thirty calendrer days. If the Department is unable to make a determination in this time, the dealer will be notified AND MAY DELIVER THE FIREARM(s) TO YOU at his/her discretion."
PS. Former FFL, Twenty year owner of my own company, college grad ( back when it meant something ) and at least average reading comprehension. The biggest offenders are Sportsmens Warehouse, Turners, Bass Pro Shops. Go to a smaller local shop that respcts your rights. |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If only such a thing existed in LA.
They generally do not. Doesn't get much more behind enemy lines. It isn't possible to be a FFL in the city of LA w/o having corporate (and/or LEO) backing.
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall "“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamala Harris Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most of us live in Calif. not Los Angeles. There may not be any in LA. although it is a pretty large area when you include all the cities around it. In my area there are several. Kind of begs the question why anyone would live there?
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Seriously? Is this the new "Why would anyone live in CA"? Stupid.
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall "“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamala Harris Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very small list. You know I release on undetermined but I still don’t want to be on a list. Very few do.
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() - FF Firearms - Insight Shooting Range - Kellers' Arms - Lambert Pawn 口口 PD Gun Supply & Tool *Inconsistent* Feel free to send me a DM if you want to be removed/never added; I'm happy to respect your wishes.
__________________
Spreadsheet of FFLs that release on "Undetermined" status from DROS Please help out by submitting FFLs in the below thread or submission form: CA Undetermined Friendly FFL Submission Form Related CGN Thread here |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |