|
2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Question about AW cases (Rupp and Miller)
Hey everyone. Can someone please explain the difference between Rupp v Becerra and Miller v Becerra?
I know they are both related to AW bans, but after reading the complaint in both, I cant really determine the difference. Rupp's complaint by CRPA was clear and concise, well outlined and went into great detail. In contrast, Miller's complaint wasn't as detailed and only a page or two. If we are successfull in Rupp, does that mean that Miller is moot? Sorry if this has been answered before but I couldn't find anything that explained the difference in the cases. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
https://youtu.be/4ZEaVfHLkog
He’s got a couple more videos discussing each case in more detail as well |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Perhaps my oversimplified answer:
Rupp: "Assault weapons" with detachable magazines. Miller: "Assault weapons" with fixed magazines. I think Miller is saying the fixed-magazine limit of 10 rounds is now in disagreement with Duncan. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I think that is how Miller started. I believe it was strategic to get transferred to Benitez. Recall that Duncan was just about grandfathered magazines then Benitez tossed out the entire law. I think Miller was trying to take the same track. Get the case infront of Benitez then try to expand the scope and undo all of the AW laws.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|