|
National 2nd Amend. Political & Legal Discussion Discuss national gun rights and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#161
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
#162
|
||||
|
||||
The child has to prove that they are self-sufficient. That rules out nearly all of them, except for a handful of young entrepreneurs and entertainers.
It also doesn't legally change their age to that of an adult, it simply entitles them to have power of attorney over themselves, instead of their parents, with regards to legal paperwork and such. It's not like they can suddenly go out and buy tobacco and longguns. Your birthday won't change on your driver's license. So it's a bit different than the sex-change argument, as doing a sex-change effectively makes you the other gender - your license change, your passport will change, you'll use the opposite restrooms, etc.
__________________
Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do. Last edited by CandG; 01-07-2016 at 10:10 AM.. |
#163
|
||||
|
||||
Unless the parent signs off on it. Happened with my ex and one of her kids that tricked her into signing it.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
#164
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Settle down, folks. The new "ghost gun" regulations probably don't do what you think they do. |
#165
|
||||
|
||||
You know....yea, kinda like that without the 2nd kid.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
#166
|
||||
|
||||
I sent out an e-mail to eight of my friends yesterday offering to pay for 4 people to sign up with the NRA. 2 people responded to accept the offer, 1 said he was already planning to sign up (and did), and 4 said they had already signed up in the last 2 months due to the BS from our President. The 4 that had previously signed up try to avoid Politics at all costs, but decided they had no choice but to get involved. Hopefully this same thought process is going on Nationally and there will be a significant spike in NRA membership.
|
#167
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
As crazy as I may sound, I'm thinking that your method might actually prove more successful than getting a hoard of NRA members to gang up, insult and belittle non-member gun owners into joining.. *************************** Would anyone like to try and guess how many new members we've insulted into joining us today??? Maybe if we accuse all non-members of "peeing sitting down" - they'll want to sign up! Yeah, lets try that!! |
#168
|
||||||
|
||||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But I don't give a rip about the Democrats. I'm a Liberal, not a Democrat. The NRA leadership should be reaching out to Liberal gun owners, and there are many of us. We just see that we're not particularly wanted over there at the NRA, and so we respect that and leave them alone. See my above response as well. Quote:
It's because of the VCDL that Virginia became a shall-issue state. Here are a few more things they've done. - State-wide preemption so, for example, Arlington and Fairfax Counties cannot enact any restrictions stricter than State law. - Got rid of the ban on CC'ing in so-called "bars" (VA doesn't actually have bars, by law, but restaurants can certainly, and do, serve booze). - Got rid of "one handgun a month". - Got state-wide pre-emption extended to "pneumatic guns" (airguns). - Improved the law for penalizing inadvertent carry on school grounds. This is one of the few pro-gun-owner bills we actually got McAwful to sign. - Got concealed handgun permit (CHP) holders' information exempted from FOIA requests, in the wake of those hypocritical Journal-News fools in New York. - Got rid of the fingerprint requirement in some municipalities for CHP's. That's right, we don't require fingerprints anymore. - Got a new law passed and signed that holds local municipalities legally and financially responsible (i. e. they can be sued, including for attorneys' fees) for local statutes in violation of state-wide pre-emption. This is basically the "lite" version of Florida's law which does something similar. And the VCDL has challenged illegal act after illegal act on the part of municipal officials who think that State pre-emption somehow doesn't apply to them. So, yeah, they're actually pretty doggone effective. And regarding Atty Gen. "Red" Herring, yes, we are working on punishing him for that. We are *MAD AS HORNETS* about the evil act that Red Herring committed. We are also working on punishing McAwful for his illegal Executive Order #50, basically "no carry in State-owned facilities unless you're LEO". Both of these problems are going to take some time to resolve. But we are working on it. Come Lobby Day (falls on MLK Jr. Day), we once again will be in the State General Assembly lobbying our elected officials. And, as always, we will be doing so while armed in accordance with the law. Yes, we can and do carry legally in the General Assembly building here! That is *legal* here. And I will be among them, Model 629 holstered at my side.
__________________
"San Francisco Liberal With A Gun" F***ing with people's heads, one gun show at a time. Hallelujah! http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com (reloading info w/ videos) http://www.liberalsguncorner.com (podcast) http://www.youtube.com/sfliberal (YouTube channel) ---------------------------------------------------- To be a true Liberal, you must be 100% pro-Second Amendment. Anything less is inconsistent with liberalism. |
#169
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups |
#170
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups Last edited by TRICKSTER; 01-08-2016 at 10:24 PM.. |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
My replies in Bold:
Quote:
BTW, I just read about what happened to your Dad. I'm So Sorry. I hope they catch the Human Scum that did this. Some people deserve a well placed Bullet to the Head, and these four thugs have certainly earned a one way trip out of existence. Noble |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Poslano z mojega A0001 z uporabo Tapatalk |
#173
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Which would not be a problem leaving us to the GOP if it weren't for the Republicans' insistence on making the same mistake with other issues. But the result will be a lot more costly. Republicans are not going to gain any votes by saying they want to get rid of same sex marriage (good luck with that). They're only going to lose some.
__________________
WTB: French & Finnish firearms. WTS: raw honey, tumbled .45 ACP brass, stupid cat. |
#174
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups |
#175
|
||||
|
||||
I hope you do realize that if Prop 8 got back on the ballot nowadays, it would get slaughtered.
__________________
WTB: French & Finnish firearms. WTS: raw honey, tumbled .45 ACP brass, stupid cat. |
#176
|
||||
|
||||
That's CA, not nationwide. Republicans wouldn't win CA even if they supported same sex marriage. The simple fact is that same sex marriage has lost in almost every state where the people have been allowed to vote on it. If it wasn't for judicial fiat, same sex marriage wouldn't exist in most states.
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups |
#177
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The argument would also apply to Initiative 594 of Washington State, the "universal background check" initiative. People voted on the issue. The people spoke. Done. Right? Yeah, that's what I thought. :-) So, just because a majority of people may choose to vote for something doesn't automatically make it the right thing to do.
__________________
"San Francisco Liberal With A Gun" F***ing with people's heads, one gun show at a time. Hallelujah! http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com (reloading info w/ videos) http://www.liberalsguncorner.com (podcast) http://www.youtube.com/sfliberal (YouTube channel) ---------------------------------------------------- To be a true Liberal, you must be 100% pro-Second Amendment. Anything less is inconsistent with liberalism. |
#178
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups |
#179
|
||||
|
||||
I'm not the one who brought up gay marriage, bud. Go talk to the ones who did.
Indeed, folks, let's get back to the subject of guns.
__________________
"San Francisco Liberal With A Gun" F***ing with people's heads, one gun show at a time. Hallelujah! http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com (reloading info w/ videos) http://www.liberalsguncorner.com (podcast) http://www.youtube.com/sfliberal (YouTube channel) ---------------------------------------------------- To be a true Liberal, you must be 100% pro-Second Amendment. Anything less is inconsistent with liberalism. Last edited by Cowboy T; 01-11-2016 at 5:40 PM.. |
#180
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
People are liberal because they take liberties with the constitution's language, among other things, usually being liberal about their freedoms as well and allowing them to be infringed for the sake of effortless derived goods or services, inviting government to apply controls to that as if seeking a mother to guide them, often convey a feebleness to the point of self-destruction, that government knows best, and will provide, that nobody needs to be solely self sufficient, and everyone should have an equal share whether earned or not. Libertarians are conservative about their liberties and civil rights, wanting the government to butt out of their affairs; they can handle their own, are fully self sufficient, responsible, and have no desire to stand in line for toilet paper or government cheese. Libertarians eschew the "equal share" construct as Marxism, for they know it leads to Stalinism.
__________________
----------------------------------------------- Quote:
|
#181
|
|||
|
|||
I urge all Americans to stand up to all Internationalist, Progressive politicians who would sell out our heritage, our Bill of Rights, and further subjugate this country to the values of Great Britain, Australia, Norway and Mars. Its called, "Vote in the upcoming General Election and tear them out of their seats."
|
#182
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
This is my answer to that question. http://www.liberalsguncorner.com/?p=114
__________________
"San Francisco Liberal With A Gun" F***ing with people's heads, one gun show at a time. Hallelujah! http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com (reloading info w/ videos) http://www.liberalsguncorner.com (podcast) http://www.youtube.com/sfliberal (YouTube channel) ---------------------------------------------------- To be a true Liberal, you must be 100% pro-Second Amendment. Anything less is inconsistent with liberalism. |
#183
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I also point out, with no small amount of pride, that it was partly because of my Dad, another pro-2A Liberal, that I changed my own view on firearms for the better, seven and a half years ago. And now his guns protect his son--me. EDIT: that reminds me, since while staunchly pro-2A, Dad didn't care for the NRA (neither does my Mom), it might help folks to understand some aspects of why. Then, perhaps some changes can be made to make things better. http://www.cmosnetworks.com/WhyWeNee...eLiberals.html
__________________
"San Francisco Liberal With A Gun" F***ing with people's heads, one gun show at a time. Hallelujah! http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com (reloading info w/ videos) http://www.liberalsguncorner.com (podcast) http://www.youtube.com/sfliberal (YouTube channel) ---------------------------------------------------- To be a true Liberal, you must be 100% pro-Second Amendment. Anything less is inconsistent with liberalism. Last edited by Cowboy T; 01-12-2016 at 3:45 PM.. Reason: Added why my pro-2A Dad was never an NRA member |
#184
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups |
#185
|
||||
|
||||
Nice try. Same applies to the KKK, but I'm not going to become a member to try to change it! You're a member, so, *YOU* get *YOUR* fellow members to change, then come talk to me.
__________________
"San Francisco Liberal With A Gun" F***ing with people's heads, one gun show at a time. Hallelujah! http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com (reloading info w/ videos) http://www.liberalsguncorner.com (podcast) http://www.youtube.com/sfliberal (YouTube channel) ---------------------------------------------------- To be a true Liberal, you must be 100% pro-Second Amendment. Anything less is inconsistent with liberalism. |
#186
|
||||
|
||||
Interesting that you would compare the largest and most successful gun rights organization in the USA to the KKK. Tells me all I need to know about your true beliefs on the topic of gun rights
__________________
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups |
#187
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You do realize it is only coincidence that "liberal" begins the same way as "Libertarian" or "Liberty" but the two are not even remotely related other than to be applied as I described above. Your link merely proves your misunderstanding of the definition of the word itself. Likewise, "Liberal" was never an admirable term or definition; it was and still is a derogatory epithet. You may wish to call yourself a progressive, even if you are an uninformed one. But have it I guess.
__________________
----------------------------------------------- Quote:
|
#188
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You can thank us AND the NRA... later.
__________________
----------------------------------------------- Quote:
|
#189
|
|||
|
|||
You really should belong to a civil rights org that protects your 2A rights if you value them IMHO. The only effective organization thus far is the NRA (on the national front). Our state organizations have been less effective as we can see by the results, but I'd hate to think how bad it would be if we had nothing.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|