Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > 2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1881  
Old 09-21-2022, 8:46 AM
SteveH SteveH is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,576
iTrader: 34 / 100%
Default

He’s going to settle?
Reply With Quote
  #1882  
Old 09-21-2022, 1:15 PM
TruOil TruOil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,831
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Not sure where you heard that, but it makes sense. He has already won. Indisputably, this County denied him and all similarly situated on the island for lack of good cause. With Bruen holding that there is a right to bear and that good cause cannot be required, Hi. has no basis under its current statute to deny him a license. Assuming that Hi. offers him a license, some modicum of damages for deprivation of his rights, and his attorney's fees, it makes sense to say, "OK, we are done here." He is no spring chicken, after all, and it may take a couple of years and thousands more $$$ to get the case to trial.
Reply With Quote
  #1883  
Old 09-21-2022, 2:26 PM
curtisfong's Avatar
curtisfong curtisfong is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,887
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1793327

Yakutake v Hawaii is still being litigated. Not sure of the overlap, and not sure what makes this belong in 2A national and not here...
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall

"“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamala Harris

Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome
Reply With Quote
  #1884  
Old 09-23-2022, 7:28 PM
Sgt Raven's Avatar
Sgt Raven Sgt Raven is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 85/101
Posts: 3,461
iTrader: 26 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by f80vm View Post
Is the district court’s jurisdiction the same as the 9th’s? The reason I ask…is it possible that the 9th knowing these cases are losses for the states and that it will have to rule against them, remanding these cases back to the district courts so that once the cases come back to them, they’ll simply refuse to hear it thus limiting the decision to that specific state?

I hope my question makes sense.

Look up 1992 9th Circuit & Death Penalty cases.


SCOTUS Bitch Slapped the 9th & the District Courts, telling them to hear the cases in a timely manner. It sent shock waves thru the legal profession, in how strong the rebuke was.


It was glorious.
__________________

DILLIGAF
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
"Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
"The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"
Reply With Quote
  #1885  
Old 09-25-2022, 5:33 AM
press1280 press1280 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 3,017
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by f80vm View Post
Is the district court’s jurisdiction the same as the 9th’s? The reason I ask…is it possible that the 9th knowing these cases are losses for the states and that it will have to rule against them, remanding these cases back to the district courts so that once the cases come back to them, they’ll simply refuse to hear it thus limiting the decision to that specific state?

I hope my question makes sense.
The 9th can't refuse to hear the case.

The only reason these are being sent back to the District Court now is that Bruen changed the whole 2A landscape, and the reasoning behind the district's (and CA9's) recent opinions is now more or less wrong, even though in some cases the final result may be the same as before.
Reply With Quote
  #1886  
Old 09-25-2022, 5:37 AM
press1280 press1280 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 3,017
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by curtisfong View Post
https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1793327

Yakutake v Hawaii is still being litigated. Not sure of the overlap, and not sure what makes this belong in 2A national and not here...
IDK other than its the same circuit.

Yakutake seems to be challenging the aspects of the registration process, not the carry permit portion.
Reply With Quote
  #1887  
Old 10-22-2022, 11:09 AM
press1280 press1280 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 3,017
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TruOil View Post
Not sure where you heard that, but it makes sense. He has already won. Indisputably, this County denied him and all similarly situated on the island for lack of good cause. With Bruen holding that there is a right to bear and that good cause cannot be required, Hi. has no basis under its current statute to deny him a license. Assuming that Hi. offers him a license, some modicum of damages for deprivation of his rights, and his attorney's fees, it makes sense to say, "OK, we are done here." He is no spring chicken, after all, and it may take a couple of years and thousands more $$$ to get the case to trial.
Here's the letter to the judge saying that all parties have agreed to a settlement: https://michellawyers.com/wp-content...Settlement.pdf
What that settlement looks like is unknown, but likely he got a CCW, as they've updated their standards so that concealed doesn't require "need" anymore, however open carry does still:
https://www.hawaiipolice.com/wp-cont...n-Proce.._.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #1888  
Old 10-29-2022, 8:36 PM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,278
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by press1280 View Post
Here's the letter to the judge saying that all parties have agreed to a settlement: https://michellawyers.com/wp-content...Settlement.pdf
What that settlement looks like is unknown, but likely he got a CCW, as they've updated their standards so that concealed doesn't require "need" anymore, however open carry does still:
https://www.hawaiipolice.com/wp-cont...n-Proce.._.pdf
So has Hawaii County Counsel agreed to the proposed settlement yet?

ETA: IIRC, Flanagan gets going once Young is disposed.
https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1232726

Last edited by Paladin; 10-29-2022 at 9:17 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #1889  
Old 10-31-2022, 7:02 PM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,278
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paladin View Post
So has Hawaii County Counsel agreed to the proposed settlement yet?

ETA: IIRC, Flanagan gets going once Young is disposed.
https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/....php?t=1232726
Its now end of the workday for Oct 31. November in the morning! Any word yet on whether a settlement was agreed to and signed by all parties???

Reply With Quote
  #1890  
Old 11-04-2022, 4:37 PM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,278
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paladin View Post
Its now end of the workday for Oct 31. November in the morning! Any word yet on whether a settlement was agreed to and signed by all parties???

Reply With Quote
  #1891  
Old 11-11-2022, 5:10 AM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,278
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paladin View Post
Reply With Quote
  #1892  
Old 11-12-2022, 2:20 PM
Sputnik's Avatar
Sputnik Sputnik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: East Bay
Posts: 1,967
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paladin View Post
Reply With Quote
  #1893  
Old 11-28-2022, 5:24 PM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,278
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by press1280 View Post
Here's the letter to the judge saying that all parties have agreed to a settlement: https://michellawyers.com/wp-content...Settlement.pdf
What that settlement looks like is unknown, but likely he got a CCW, as they've updated their standards so that concealed doesn't require "need" anymore, however open carry does still:
https://www.hawaiipolice.com/wp-cont...n-Proce.._.pdf
Less than 3 days until Dec 01. Young was supposed to be settled by Nov 01. Anyone know what happened?
Reply With Quote
  #1894  
Old 12-03-2022, 4:18 AM
press1280 press1280 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 3,017
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paladin View Post
Less than 3 days until Dec 01. Young was supposed to be settled by Nov 01. Anyone know what happened?
https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gun-l...nt-courtwatch/

According to the Giffords people (sorry it was the only place I could find any additional info) there was supposed to be a status conference at the District Court on November 17th. That's all I have right now.
Reply With Quote
  #1895  
Old 12-03-2022, 6:46 AM
BAJ475's Avatar
BAJ475 BAJ475 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Kootenai County Idaho (Hayden)
Posts: 4,664
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by press1280 View Post
https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gun-l...nt-courtwatch/

According to the Giffords people (sorry it was the only place I could find any additional info) there was supposed to be a status conference at the District Court on November 17th. That's all I have right now.
From their website:
"The gun lobby won’t stop pushing its radical interpretation of the Second Amendment in the courts. But we have common sense and evidence on our side, and we’re not backing down." To which I respond neither are we and we are better armed! True common sense is: No way are we going to allow you to take our guns.
Reply With Quote
  #1896  
Old 12-03-2022, 7:39 AM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,278
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by press1280 View Post
https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gun-l...nt-courtwatch/

According to the Giffords people (sorry it was the only place I could find any additional info) there was supposed to be a status conference at the District Court on November 17th. That's all I have right now.
Thx.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BAJ475 View Post
From their website:
"The gun lobby won’t stop pushing its radical interpretation of the Second Amendment in the courts. But we have common sense and evidence on our side, and we’re not backing down." To which I respond neither are we and we are better armed! True common sense is: No way are we going to allow you to take our guns.
Well, sounds like it is still in play. At least we haven’t lost.

Reply With Quote
  #1897  
Old 12-16-2022, 5:25 PM
LonghornBob LonghornBob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 141
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Young v. Hawaii is settled.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...04146.89.0.pdf

Don't know what Mr. Young got in the settlement.

I guess that means if you want the courts in the 9th circuit to rule that you can open carry, you are in the good hands of Mr. Nichols.

Last edited by LonghornBob; 12-16-2022 at 5:29 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #1898  
Old 12-16-2022, 6:51 PM
pacrat pacrat is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Socialist Republic of SoCal
Posts: 10,220
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by LonghornBob View Post
Young v. Hawaii is settled.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...04146.89.0.pdf

Don't know what Mr. Young got in the settlement.

I guess that means if you want the courts in the 9th circuit to rule that you can open carry, you are in the good hands of Mr. Nichols.
Hopefully, when our own 2A attack wolf gets a moment. Who is Mr Young's attorney in this matter, Alan Beck aka [WOLFWOOD] Can drop in and give us a synopsis of the overall outcome.
Reply With Quote
  #1899  
Old 12-17-2022, 3:54 AM
press1280 press1280 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 3,017
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LonghornBob View Post
Young v. Hawaii is settled.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...04146.89.0.pdf

Don't know what Mr. Young got in the settlement.

I guess that means if you want the courts in the 9th circuit to rule that you can open carry, you are in the good hands of Mr. Nichols.
He should be getting a CCW. As far as a monetary settlement I don't know if that's something that will be made public, although I would think since the state/local government is on the hook it would be available somehow but IANAL.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:26 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy