#41
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Manually operated rimfire pistol = yes. Featureless semi-auto rimfire pistol = yes. Semi-auto rimfire pistol with fixed magazine = no. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the reply, I find myself enjoying my 22 more often shooting and glad to hear I have some extra rounds available now for plinking
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Can you use a 20rd ProMag rotating drum magazine in a semi-automatic magazine fed shotgun that you registered in 2018? That semi-auto magazine fed shotgun has a magazine locking device (BB) and has previously been limited to maximum 10 round/shell magazine. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
As far as I read the laws rimfire doesn't count for pretty much anything. So you can use whatever magazine in whatever weapon in whatever configuration.
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Expert firearms attorney: https://www.rwslaw.com/team/adam-j-richards/ Check out https://www.firearmsunknown.com/. Support a good calgunner local to San Diego. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah that's my take except for semi auto rifle fixed magazine pistol
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Because as proof that they read this forum, some folks were celebrating "YAY! I can put a standard release on my AR and dump the bullet button if I register!" And then the wording changed to specifically say that BB guns need to keep their BBs. That wasn't in the very first draft of the legislation, but you bet your *** they added it later because we found a flaw in their thinking.
__________________
It was not a threat. It was an exaggerated response to an uncompromising stance. I was taught never to make a threat unless you are prepared to carry it out and I am not a fan of carrying anything. Even watching other people carrying things makes me uncomfortable. Mainly because of the possibility they may ask me to help. |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall "“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamala Harris Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
What kind of pistol? Answer is dependent on that info.
If it is a manually operated single-shot pistol, then no, because CA DOJ BOF is holding the stance that modifying it from a single-shot to a repeater will cause it to an unsafe handgun. If it is a manually operated repeating pistol, then yes, it is CA legal for it to use detachable magazines of any capacity. If it is a semi-auto pistol that does not have a fixed magazine, then yes, it is CA legal for it to use detachable magazines of any capacity. If it is a semi-auto pistol that has a fixed magazine, then no, it is limited to a 10 or less round magazine in order to remain CA legal. [PC 30515(a)(5)]
__________________
"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001). Last edited by Quiet; 04-05-2019 at 1:08 AM.. |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
Penumbra? That's a play out of the Libs playbook.
Last edited by BAJ475; 04-05-2019 at 5:36 PM.. Reason: correct typo |
#53
|
||||
|
||||
I think so. It’s a RAW. Having a 30rd mag in a fixed-mag gun makes it an assault weapon. You already have a RAW so I would assume it’s hunky-dory.
__________________
WTB: 2.5” Colt Python 2.5" Smith & Wesson Model 19 2.5" Smith & Wesson Model 66 4" Smith & Wesson Model 19 3.5" Smith & Wesson Model 29 Colt Series 70 1911 Sig Sauer West German P228 Glock Gen5 19/17/34 MOS |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
Rimfire?
I know it's in the AW flow chart but can anyone clarify on rimfire. I get, rimfire featureless you can use standard capacity (greater than 10 rounds). But what about rimfire with evil features? Can you use standard capacity mags? Sorry if this is posted elsewhere.
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Yes as long as the receiver is a registered AW. It was not possible to register an AW as 22 cal so it would have to be a conversion of a centerfire registered AW.
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Trouble is that magazines are not an integral part of the gun since they classified as a magazines and not cylinders. You make the call. I wouldn't mess with it because it's too close in misinterpretation like the whole SKS and Yugo 59/66 nomenclature with detachable magazines. http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/a.../t-251895.html
__________________
Anyway...here's a dearth of reasoning to ponder: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Guns Last edited by Swagman00; 04-07-2019 at 7:33 AM.. |
#57
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, just to make this clear, there is nothing in the legislation requiring you to keep the bullet button on after registering your firearm as an assault weapon. That requirement was made as part of the regulations because DOJ realized that the legislators were idiots and their legislation allowed the bullet button's removal after the gun became a RAW.
Why? Because a RAW is a RAW is a RAW. The law itself doesn't recognize a BBRAW. |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And the Judge is illegal as a short-barreled shotgun - Quote:
__________________
ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."Ann Althouse: “Begin with the hypothesis that what they did is what they wanted to do. If they postured that they wanted to do something else, regard that as a con. Work from there. The world will make much more sense.” Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs. |
#59
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Many members share this interpretation but no one wants to be the test case.
__________________
WTB: 2.5” Colt Python 2.5" Smith & Wesson Model 19 2.5" Smith & Wesson Model 66 4" Smith & Wesson Model 19 3.5" Smith & Wesson Model 29 Colt Series 70 1911 Sig Sauer West German P228 Glock Gen5 19/17/34 MOS |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
Gotcha. Thats what I get for refrencing old threads.
__________________
Anyway...here's a dearth of reasoning to ponder: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Guns |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
So I can take my featureless Sub2000, and stick a 50 round glock drum in it and not be committing a felony? I remember Penal Code 32310(c) being the issue with that and if everything reverted back to the old chains we had, even if that week we were able to buy these, can they still be used?
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
What about this proposed scenario: Say someone has a maglocked ar15, but wants to buy the CMMG 22lr bolt conversion. Would LCMs of 22lr be allowed in that configuration since the upper is now technically a 22lr? (but the lower still using the maglock) Additionally, what about dedicated 22lr uppers that are swapped out into maglocked lowers? (almost the same as above but the above was only a bolt replacement) |
#65
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If I were to consider an AR22, I would skip conversion kits and just build a dedicated one so that I can fully utilize all of the evil features as well as standard cap magazines. Or just buy an M&P15-22. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|