Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > 2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

2nd Amend. Litigation Updates & Legal Discussion Discuss California 2A related litigation and legal topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 10-15-2021, 3:23 PM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,284
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aldo The Apache View Post
All hope is lost in California. No one in the free states are bitting their nails, anxiously waiting on the courts to give the poors crumbs or any at all. I’m outta this ****-hole of a state. Y’all can keep waiting for the courts to turn the other cheek, sending donations, paying 3x retail for “off rosters”, 10 day waits, ammo backgrounds, skyrocketing ammo prices and fighting uphill battles toward annihilation til there’s nothing left. As for me: I’ll save all of that for ammo, gear and training in a free state. Ghost, deuces, two fingas - I’m out
Ha!

Compare these two maps to see all the CCW progress we’ve made WITHOUT a CCW/Bear court case win. We went from ~60k CCWs to >120k (2018) (and AFTER that we won San Diego Co, Sonoma Co and LA Co).



Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 10-15-2021, 3:30 PM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,284
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnireland View Post
There is no place/state to run to. The SCOTUS will be packed, and then guns will be ruled by Executive Orders. The Constitution is dead.


It’s not like 42 states are now Shall Issue and 21 of them are also Constitutional Carry….

Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 11-10-2021, 12:17 AM
Nvberinger Nvberinger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 730
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default Renna vs Becerra - 3 removed for each 1 added under fire

Wednesday, November 10, 2021
Gun Lobby Challenge to California Handgun Roster Advances
It's the first legal challenge to a new California rule that requires the removal of three grandfathered handguns for every new gun added to the roster of guns that can be sold in the state.

BIANCA BRUNO / April 26, 2021

https://www.courthousenews.com/gun-l...ster-advances/

SAN DIEGO (CN) --- A federal judge found California’s new handgun law provision requiring the removal of three grandfathered handguns for every new handgun added to its list of guns that can be sold in the state “substantially infringes” Californians’ ability to purchase handguns for self-defense.

U.S. District Chief Judge Dana Sabraw found the “three-to-one” provision of California’s Unsafe Handgun Act, which went into effect Jan. 1, “imposes a greater restriction on the pool of handguns available for sale in California” and may violate the Second Amendment.

“The court is not persuaded there is a ‘reasonable fit’ between the state’s asserted objective and the three-for-one provision,” Sabraw, a George W. Bush appointee, wrote.

“Defendants offer no justification for why the statute requires the removal of three handguns for each new handgun added, i
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 11-10-2021, 3:05 AM
DB> DB> is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 772
iTrader: 26 / 100%
Default

There's NEVER been a "reasonable fit" for most KA gun laws.... too bad it's taking outrageous legislative overreach to get judges to finally SEE it.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 11-10-2021, 10:22 AM
DanMedeiros DanMedeiros is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 30
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Good! I'm hoping a strong decision in NYSRPA can get rid of this scrutiny garbage. It's so intellectually corrupt to argue that the pistols that are safe enough for cops to carry are unsafe for us plebs. Especially so when they are just update more reliable models of ones currently available (Gen 3 vs Gen 5 Glock and m&p shield plus)
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 11-10-2021, 5:45 PM
Paladin's Avatar
Paladin Paladin is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SFBA
Posts: 12,284
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nvberinger View Post
Wednesday, November 10, 2021
Gun Lobby Challenge to California Handgun Roster Advances
It's the first legal challenge to a new California rule that requires the removal of three grandfathered handguns for every new gun added to the roster of guns that can be sold in the state.

BIANCA BRUNO / April 26, 2021

https://www.courthousenews.com/gun-l...ster-advances/

SAN DIEGO (CN) --- A federal judge found California’s new handgun law provision requiring the removal of three grandfathered handguns for every new handgun added to its list of guns that can be sold in the state “substantially infringes” Californians’ ability to purchase handguns for self-defense.

U.S. District Chief Judge Dana Sabraw found the “three-to-one” provision of California’s Unsafe Handgun Act, ….
Folks, this is all BS. The linked source took an old article from last April and slapped a new introductory paragraph on it and republished it for click bait. Bill Wiese posted about this court action on 2021 April 27 in post #41. Sorry but there’s no new news or movement in this case.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 07-07-2022, 1:57 PM
CCWFacts CCWFacts is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,150
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

So, what's next for this case in light of the SCOTUS ruling and the GVRs?
__________________
"Weakness is provocative."
Senator Tom Cotton, president in 2024

Victoria "Tori" Rose Smith's life mattered.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 07-07-2022, 2:13 PM
abinsinia's Avatar
abinsinia abinsinia is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,717
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CCWFacts View Post
So, what's next for this case in light of the SCOTUS ruling and the GVRs?
they have to request the judge to reinstate/reconsider the original claims, which was the roster is unconstitutional. That was dismissed before the NYSRPA case.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 07-07-2022, 3:41 PM
JiuJitsu's Avatar
JiuJitsu JiuJitsu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 345
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abinsinia View Post
they have to request the judge to reinstate/reconsider the original claims, which was the roster is unconstitutional. That was dismissed before the NYSRPA case.
Exactly. And I don't know if the judge has to do this - but it seems they should.

Reconsidering the dismissal of this part of the current active case should be mandatory in my opinion since the entire basis for the original roster decision is now considered improper (intermediate scrutiny) per the Bruen decision. The judge's recent dismissal of the part challenging the entire roster in the current case simply denies the plaintiff the ability to challenge that constitutionality. That seems egregious. But hey, this is the 9th Circuit...so I guess I should expect these shenanigans.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 07-18-2022, 1:48 PM
JiuJitsu's Avatar
JiuJitsu JiuJitsu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 345
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Next conference on this case will be July 29th. Hopefully we'll see some push to restore the challenge to the roster itself now that Bruen was decided.

Regardless, this case may not be resolved until Spring 2023 based on the dates they provided previously. I assume they did that to give ample time for the potential effects of Bruen and all the other 2A cases pending.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...&order_by=desc
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 07-18-2022, 2:16 PM
abinsinia's Avatar
abinsinia abinsinia is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,717
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

they should also request preliminary injunction.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 07-18-2022, 3:05 PM
johnireland johnireland is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 273
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

The Marxists/Democrats are playing for time. If they hold one or both of the House and Senate this year, and hold the WH in 2024...natural attrition will put the SCOTUS back in the liberal camp, and the 2nd Amendment and all the rest of the Constitution will be dead. One can even argue that after the 2020 election, it was only a matter of time...that America is in a permanent vegetative that it can never recover from. And the plug will be pulleld on life support sooner than we all think.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 07-18-2022, 4:02 PM
JiuJitsu's Avatar
JiuJitsu JiuJitsu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 345
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Yea, a preliminary injunction should be a tool used (or at least requested) MUCH more often in my opinion. These cases are all but doomed for the State under the new 2A criteria. I don't see how they could pass any reasonable text, history and tradition test.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 07-18-2022, 4:50 PM
OleCuss OleCuss is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 6,441
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiuJitsu View Post
Next conference on this case will be July 29th. Hopefully we'll see some push to restore the challenge to the roster itself now that Bruen was decided.

Regardless, this case may not be resolved until Spring 2023 based on the dates they provided previously. I assume they did that to give ample time for the potential effects of Bruen and all the other 2A cases pending.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...&order_by=desc
I'm guessing that I'm misunderstanding what is going on with this case.

To me it looks like the case has been abandoned and they are just finishing up the proceedings to put the final nail in the coffin.

It doesn't look like the plaintiff(s) is pursuing the case and the lawyers quit their representation.

So rather than reviving wouldn't they have to re-file the case and proceed from there? I'm not asserting that this is how it would have to go - I'm asking.
__________________
CGN's token life-long teetotaling vegetarian. Don't consider anything I post as advice or as anything more than opinion (if even that).
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 07-18-2022, 5:10 PM
curtisfong's Avatar
curtisfong curtisfong is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,887
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OleCuss View Post
It doesn't look like the plaintiff(s) is pursuing the case and the lawyers quit their representation.
Seems that way. This case is dead dead looks like. We'll have to start all over again, for the 3rd time.

Really, though, the plaintiffs need to do a much better job of forum shopping the next time around.
__________________
The Rifle on the Wall

"“[S]cientific proof” of both gun-rights and gun-control theories “is very hard to get”; therefore, requiring “some substantial scientific proof to show that a [firearm] law will indeed substantially reduce crime and injury” is tantamount to applying strict scrutiny to, and almost certainly will lead to invalidation of, the law." - Kamala Harris

Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 07-18-2022, 5:22 PM
JiuJitsu's Avatar
JiuJitsu JiuJitsu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 345
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Post #72 from abinsinia shows the last major scheduling change for this case that I saw. It contains a ton of pre-trial dates for things to be submitted throughout 2022. It looks like the actual trial is scheduled to start on March 20, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.

So yea, this is a slow roll. But it IS an active case preparing for trial. And this pace may work in our favor. The Bruen case was decided, which changed everything. I'm sure the lawyers in this case are all over this one, watching other 2A cases happening now, and preparing their offense accordingly. I am cautiously optimistic.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 07-18-2022, 5:37 PM
OleCuss OleCuss is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 6,441
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JiuJitsu View Post
Post #72 from abinsinia shows the last major scheduling change for this case that I saw. It contains a ton of pre-trial dates for things to be submitted throughout 2022. It looks like the actual trial is scheduled to start on March 20, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.

So yea, this is a slow roll. But it IS an active case preparing for trial. And this pace may work in our favor. The Bruen case was decided, which changed everything. I'm sure the lawyers in this case are all over this one, watching other 2A cases happening now, and preparing their offense accordingly. I am cautiously optimistic.
Hopefully it is still in question and it was only Bailey who quit as plaintiff?
__________________
CGN's token life-long teetotaling vegetarian. Don't consider anything I post as advice or as anything more than opinion (if even that).
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 07-18-2022, 5:40 PM
abinsinia's Avatar
abinsinia abinsinia is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,717
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OleCuss View Post
Hopefully it is still in question and it was only Bailey who quit as plaintiff?
The judge ruled that the old roster laws couldn't be challenged because another case, Pena, had already done that. That was before NYSRPA v. Bruen.

All that will come back.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 07-19-2022, 4:15 PM
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ's Avatar
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 989
iTrader: 17 / 100%
Default

Anyone notice the Joint Stipulation and Motion to Vacate Scheduling Order filed today? It's at https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...92378.45.0.pdf

Among other things,
The parties further stipulate and agree that Plaintiffs will file a second amended complaint on or before August 22, 2022, with the case to thereafter proceed in accordance with the process and timelines set forth in the applicable rules.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 07-19-2022, 4:34 PM
pacrat pacrat is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Socialist Republic of SoCal
Posts: 10,220
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ View Post
Anyone notice the Joint Stipulation and Motion to Vacate Scheduling Order filed today? It's at https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...92378.45.0.pdf

Quote:
Among other things,
The parties further stipulate and agree that Plaintiffs will file a second amended complaint on or before August 22, 2022, with the case to thereafter proceed in accordance with the process and timelines set forth in the applicable rules.

On June 23, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in New
York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, __ U.S. __, 142 S.Ct. 2111
(2022), and significantly changed the legal landscape in Second Amendment cases
by establishing a new framework for analyzing Second Amendment claims.
Bruen is already impacting other cases involving Second Amendment claims.

See e.g., McDougall v. Ventura County, Ninth Circuit case no. 20-56220 (reversing
and remanding for further proceedings consistent with Bruen); Martinez v.
Villanueva, Ninth Circuit case no. 20-56233 (same); Nguyen v. Bonta, case no. 3:20-
cv-02470-WQH-MDD (ordering supplemental briefing and inviting submission of
supplemental evidence on pending cross-motions for summary judgment, so as to
address the proper resolution of the claims in light of Bruen’s impact on the analysis).
It is also expected that Bruen will significantly impact the manner in which
the Second Amendment claims are resolved here. Accordingly, the parties stipulate
and agree that the current Scheduling Order (ECF No. 30; ECF No. 32) be vacated,
and they respectfully request the Court’s consent to do so for good cause under FRCP
rule 16(b)(4).


IT'S ALIVE


HOPEFULLY the state won't be saying the same for their 2A INFRINGMENTS after the dust settles.


Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 07-19-2022, 4:45 PM
OleCuss OleCuss is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 6,441
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I'm hoping the prevail!
__________________
CGN's token life-long teetotaling vegetarian. Don't consider anything I post as advice or as anything more than opinion (if even that).
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 07-19-2022, 4:58 PM
JiuJitsu's Avatar
JiuJitsu JiuJitsu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 345
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

That is GREAT news. Their amended complaint will allow them to update all this in light of the Bruen decision and I predict will make it nearly impossible for the state to defend any of this under the new criteria.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 07-19-2022, 5:04 PM
JiuJitsu's Avatar
JiuJitsu JiuJitsu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 345
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Also, hopefully the new schedule for this trial will be happening sooner than it was originally scheduled. They seemed to initially push it out far into 2023 to allow SCOTUS time on their 2A decisions/actions. That has been achieved. So let's get this rolling since all parties know this will not survive text, history, and tradition scrutiny.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 07-26-2022, 9:09 AM
abinsinia's Avatar
abinsinia abinsinia is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,717
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

The judge vacated the current schedule on 7/22, except they will have a status conference on July 29, and

Quote:
Plaintiffs must file a second amended complaint on or before August 22, 2022
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 08-09-2022, 5:02 PM
kuug's Avatar
kuug kuug is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 773
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I honestly can't believe how slow this case is being strung along. Bruen came out in June and this Trump judge doesn't even have a status conference until September? I don't even see a motion for summary judgment or preliminary injunction to slow the process down. Even with the same Heller analysis we've had since 2008 and it's been two years of dragging feet

Last edited by kuug; 08-09-2022 at 6:08 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 08-09-2022, 5:54 PM
abinsinia's Avatar
abinsinia abinsinia is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,717
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

I would suspect the slowness is why we got the Boland case.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 08-09-2022, 7:09 PM
Elgatodeacero Elgatodeacero is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,234
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

It is a little unfair to fault the judge…… judge has given the Plaintiffs 3 weeks to file an amended complaint, then the defense gets 30 days to respond, so late September is when the case will be ready to move forward.

The judge is not slow walking this.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 08-09-2022, 7:32 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 19,361
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abinsinia View Post
I would suspect the slowness is why we got the Boland case.
This case was shelved pending NY/Bruen. Both parties agreed to this.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 08-09-2022, 8:42 PM
abinsinia's Avatar
abinsinia abinsinia is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,717
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taperxz View Post
This case was shelved pending NY/Bruen. Both parties agreed to this.
prior to Bruen even getting heard the date was set to 2023 (back in 2021). I'm not sure why the Judge set a 2023 date, but it was scheduled for a hearing a long long way out.
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 08-09-2022, 9:43 PM
ar15barrels's Avatar
ar15barrels ar15barrels is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 56,432
iTrader: 119 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abinsinia View Post
prior to Bruen even getting heard the date was set to 2023 (back in 2021). I'm not sure why the Judge set a 2023 date, but it was scheduled for a hearing a long long way out.
Probably to keep it off his 2021 and 2022 calendar as he can always change the schedule once something happens with NYSRPA.
Like now.
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 08-10-2022, 8:34 AM
cleonard cleonard is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 948
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elgatodeacero View Post
It is a little unfair to fault the judge…… judge has given the Plaintiffs 3 weeks to file an amended complaint, then the defense gets 30 days to respond, so late September is when the case will be ready to move forward.

The judge is not slow walking this.
They should be asking for a TRO as the state is clearly going to lose.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 08-10-2022, 10:33 AM
Elgatodeacero Elgatodeacero is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,234
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cleonard View Post
They should be asking for a TRO as the state is clearly going to lose.
I agree with this, but the Plaintiff has to file the motion, the judge won’t act on his own initiative.

It is common practice to file the new complaint and a motion for TRO at same time, so maybe Aug 22 will see multiple filings.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 08-10-2022, 1:37 PM
Roswell Saucer Roswell Saucer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 77
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elgatodeacero View Post
I agree with this, but the Plaintiff has to file the motion, the judge won’t act on his own initiative.

It is common practice to file the new complaint and a motion for TRO at same time, so maybe Aug 22 will see multiple filings.
Agreed. TRO would almost certainly be granted.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 08-10-2022, 3:02 PM
abinsinia's Avatar
abinsinia abinsinia is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,717
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

They are suppose to file an amended complaint on Aug. 22 per this filing,

https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...92378.45.0.pdf

I would assume they will also file a TRO or PI at that time. So it should be another week or so before we see movement.

The Boland case has a response due at a similar time around Aug. 23

Last edited by abinsinia; 08-10-2022 at 3:04 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 08-10-2022, 3:10 PM
f80vm f80vm is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 56
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

A TRO or PI against the roster would be a catastrophic event for my wallet.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 08-10-2022, 3:21 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 19,361
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abinsinia View Post
prior to Bruen even getting heard the date was set to 2023 (back in 2021). I'm not sure why the Judge set a 2023 date, but it was scheduled for a hearing a long long way out.
FPC filed AB for Bruen 1/21 2021
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 08-10-2022, 3:42 PM
SkyHawk's Avatar
SkyHawk SkyHawk is offline
Front Toward Enemy
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Outside my Southern Comfort Zone
Posts: 23,178
iTrader: 223 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by f80vm View Post
A TRO or PI against the roster would be a catastrophic event for my wallet.
Only if you are exempt from 1/30

For me it will be like a nuke went off in my wallet. 03+COE FTW
__________________
.


Last edited by SkyHawk; 08-10-2022 at 4:05 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 08-10-2022, 4:07 PM
abinsinia's Avatar
abinsinia abinsinia is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,717
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taperxz View Post
FPC filed AB for Bruen 1/21 2021
What's AB?
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 08-10-2022, 4:11 PM
taperxz taperxz is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 19,361
iTrader: 15 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abinsinia View Post
What's AB?
Amicus Brief
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 08-10-2022, 5:46 PM
abinsinia's Avatar
abinsinia abinsinia is online now
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,717
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taperxz View Post
Amicus Brief
How does that related to the 2023 scheduling for this case ?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 2:33 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2021, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.



Seams2SewBySusy