View Single Post
  #117  
Old 11-06-2013, 5:40 PM
kcbrown's Avatar
kcbrown kcbrown is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,097
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FABIO GETS GOOSED!!! View Post
The majority absolutely does object to that description, in the same quote I linked to...where they directly quote Breyer.
What they directly quoted was not Breyer's description of strict scrutiny. Breyer's description is the bit of text I bolded, and that does not appear to be quoted by the majority in any part of the decision.

I see nothing in the majority's decision that shows that they object to that description, only that they object to the application of what is described.
__________________
The Constitution is not "the Supreme Law of the Land, except in the face of contradicting law which has not yet been overturned by the courts". It is THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, PERIOD. You break your oath to uphold the Constitution if you don't refuse to enforce unadjudicated laws you believe are Unconstitutional.

The real world laughs at optimism. And here's why.

Last edited by kcbrown; 11-06-2013 at 5:44 PM..