View Single Post
  #1603  
Old 08-24-2021, 1:47 PM
TruOil TruOil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,114
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kukuforguns View Post
Do you see anything wrong with this quote:
The court explicitly held that there was a right to KEEP, but only implied that there was a right to BEAR outside the home. It did after all define the term "to bear", thus insinuating that bearing was a part of the right, but neither Heller nor McDonald addressed whether the right to bear extended outside the home. Young therefore felt "free" to conclude that the right to bear is restricted to the home. Fortunately for us, its analysis was extremely shoddy and the authorities it relied upon do not support its position.
Reply With Quote