Ruger PCC Chassis Rifle
This just out.
Just needs a fin grip. https://ruger.com/products/pcCarbine...ets/19126.html https://ruger.com/productImages/19122/detail/1.jpg |
That kind of kills the chassis aftermarket.
I guess they had to have the barrel off center in the handguard to get the sight rails low enough. I thought the best market by far for the original gun was CA because it would be legal and allow the use of lots of grandfathered (for now) Glock mags. This model is almost as expensive as 9mm AR's like the PSA. It's still has the take-down feature, but now you have to screw with wrenches to get the handguard off. |
The one glaring thing they didn’t address that the CROM chassis did is the mag release. So big failure for Ruger on that front. Otherwise it is pretty cool.
|
so ruger just released their own chassis system? or is it a new SKU where you buy it complete like that?
Since they haven't even offered the free float handguard as an accessory yet. |
Quote:
Looks nice but defeats the featureless upside that the PC9 offers. A Magpul Handguard and stock is all I’m interested in |
Quote:
|
Getting closer to a 10mm or even a Backpacker stock soon ? They sure are pushing them out fast , new looks.
|
Quote:
Anyhow, I'd rather have the non-pistol grip stock before I'd run a grip fin. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my Nokia 7.1 using Tapatalk |
Why not just build an 9mm AR? I feel like I'm missing the upside here.
|
Quote:
|
Oh wow it can get uglier
|
Just......WHY.....
|
Not bad, but it adds another half pound to an already heavy gun.
An AR9 makes more sense. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Upside: it works right out of the box. And a out half what you'll end up spending if you try to build an AR9.
Downside: mag-catch location is still FUBAR, and it's ugly as sin. Midwest Industries makes a better handguard, and just move the optic on top of the receiver and close that opening on the handguard where the rear site was. Ruger, fix the mag catch location issue FFS. |
Quote:
Exactly my thoughts. |
Magpul just need to release their own stock. I love their 10/22 takedown stock
|
Quote:
https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-...165450030.html https://palmettostatearmory.com/medi...5165450030.jpg But you need a fin and a thread protector. |
Quote:
|
Gunblast Jeff
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Basically, Ruger is it's own worst enemy in any attempt to kill an aftermarket and keep profits from accessories in-house. |
Quote:
I'm sure they backed off seeing more $$$$$$$. |
Looks like Ruger is trying to make the PCC into a pseudo-AR if you ask me. I like the original version better and it's on my "buy in the next year" list.
|
Quote:
|
This is an attribute? 10/22s aren't noted for their great triggers; it's the first thing I changed on every 10/22 I've ever owned. The only reason this could possibly be listed as a positive would be to let prospective buyers know that a Volquartsen trigger will snap right in.
"Light, crisp trigger pull with minimal overtravel and positive reset utilizing proven 10/22® trigger components." |
Quote:
This occ is only interesting because it’s one of the few pistol caliber carbines and the regular version is the only Cal legal one. As soon as something lighter becomes available everyone that has these will be dumping them! |
Maybe if there is enough talk of building AR9's over a PC Carbine Ruger will introduce their AR9 that takes Glock mags. Of course, a 10mm too.
|
Quote:
This gun is another Home Run for Ruger and it will be around for a long time. With 3 gun,USPSA and PCC Matches springing up everywhere, there are plenty of interesting uses for this gun. Also new models are coming that will bring in plenty more buyers. Randy http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/a...7&d=1570728593 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.