Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-10-2007, 7:47 PM
resistor resistor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North SD County
Posts: 276
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default Question regarding AB1471...

I was thinking about it earlier today, and god forbid this crap actually becomes law,but if it did:

Would you then have to transfer each serialized part via ffl??

What happens if you have to replace a serialized part?

Who's to say you dont have a spare on hand already?

What are they gonna do? Police your brass and look for unserialized cases?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-2007, 7:59 PM
MedSpec65's Avatar
MedSpec65 MedSpec65 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 635
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I'm wondering where you will find a gun manufacturer who will SELL you the serialized parts you are mentioning here, much less a complete CA-compliant handgun. Anybody know of any Companies that have re-tooled their plants to sell this stuff?
If this law passes, you will have very few, if any choices to make. The gun manufacturers will be discouraged from selling handguns in California, which is exactly what AB 1471 is all about.
__________________
"We're surrounded. That simplifies our problem. We can now fire in any direction and strike the enemy." ....Colonel Lewis Burwell "Chesty" Puller, Commanding the 1st Marine Regiment at The Battle of The Chosin Reservoir, Korea 1950
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-10-2007, 8:01 PM
MrTuffPaws MrTuffPaws is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,165
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Well, if it becomes law, I want my first serialized number to be 666
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-10-2007, 8:03 PM
resistor resistor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North SD County
Posts: 276
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Trust me, I get the intent of this POS legislation. These questions are more rhetorical than anything else, becuase I can imagine that manufacturers would simply stop selling here. I wouldnt blame them one bit.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-10-2007, 8:23 PM
MedSpec65's Avatar
MedSpec65 MedSpec65 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 635
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I've heard there are other eastern States that already have these laws and handguns are being sold there, but I haven't been able to identify them. I wish somebody would enlighten us.
__________________
"We're surrounded. That simplifies our problem. We can now fire in any direction and strike the enemy." ....Colonel Lewis Burwell "Chesty" Puller, Commanding the 1st Marine Regiment at The Battle of The Chosin Reservoir, Korea 1950
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-10-2007, 9:16 PM
Josh3239's Avatar
Josh3239 Josh3239 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ventura County
Posts: 8,973
iTrader: 55 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by resistor View Post
What happens if you have to replace a serialized part?
Send the whole handgun into the manufacturer for a new part. And lets not forget that the technology isn't anywhere close to perfect and its supposed to be FUBAR at around 2,500 rounds.
__________________
Proud NRA Life Member As Of 2016


"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened." Norman Thomas, American socialist
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-10-2007, 9:24 PM
RANGER295's Avatar
RANGER295 RANGER295 is offline
Super Moderator
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rural California
Posts: 3,100
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh3239 View Post
Send the whole handgun into the manufacturer for a new part. And lets not forget that the technology isn't anywhere close to perfect and its supposed to be FUBAR at around 2,500 rounds.
So on one of my .22 pistols, it would be no good after 3-4 shooting trips
__________________
WTB : A cheap beater .44 mag lever action rifle or carbine. Cosmetics do not matter, function and price are more important.

159

"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it."

- Mark Twain

Si vis pacem, para bellum
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-10-2007, 9:46 PM
glockman19 glockman19 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 10,877
iTrader: 18 / 100%
Default

Governor Schwarzenegger has not signed the bill yet. We need a VETO.

Please call and vote in opposition of AB 1471

Phone: 916-445-2841
press 1 - For english
Press 2 - To voice opinion on an Assembly bill
press 1 - Assembly bill 1471 Firearm microstamping
Press 2 - If you Oppose

Thank You
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-11-2007, 5:48 PM
BigDogatPlay's Avatar
BigDogatPlay BigDogatPlay is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beautiful progressive Sonoma County
Posts: 7,387
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

I read somewhere, and now I'll have to go try to find it again, that pretty much all of the major manufacturers have indicated that they won't tool up for microstamping technology so, presumptively if the bill is signed, after the date of effectivity there would be no new semi-autos for the approved roster.

I wonder if the exemption for peace officers and agencies to purchase non-rostered handguns would extend past any invocation of microstamping? I presume it would, but that policy (not law) seemingly would, by defnition, put "unsafe handguns" into the hands of LEOs... which could make a dandy argument in a court case somewhere in the real world, but not here in Oz.

Maryland is, I am pretty certain, doing "ballistic fingerprinting". It is, naturally, a huge and expensive failure. I don't know that any jurisdiction has mandated microstamping yet and a quick search doesn't turn any up.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-11-2007, 5:55 PM
glockman19 glockman19 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 10,877
iTrader: 18 / 100%
Default

YES manufacturers will NOT change to accomodate NEW guns we'll be stuck with what's on the list.

YES, LEO is exempt and will still be ble to buy any gun they want. Tht's where I think the legislation stinks. They are civilians when off duty and many LEO I've met and have shot with aren't any more proficient or careful than I am.

As a matter of fact I shot next to three LASD deputies and their patterns with duty weapons looked like shot gun patterns. no better than 9" @ 7 yards. NOT very good shooting.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-11-2007, 6:05 PM
CCWFacts CCWFacts is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,612
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

Right now there are about 1,000 guns on the "approved" list. Obviously the purpose of this law is to knock that number down, with the target being zero. I imagine if this passes, a handful of mass-selling guns will be retooled and available here. And revolvers.
__________________
I will spit whenever I hear the word Libertarian from now on.

In the 2016 election, Libertarian voters threw the swing states of Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico, Minnesota, New Hampshire, and Maine to Hillary, for a total of 38 electoral college votes. Hillary would have created a permanent a permanent entitlement class and permanent Democratic control over the US.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-11-2007, 6:08 PM
BigDogatPlay's Avatar
BigDogatPlay BigDogatPlay is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beautiful progressive Sonoma County
Posts: 7,387
iTrader: 13 / 100%
Default

Found this...

Quote:
"Compelling the use of this unreliable sole-sourced technology will
dramatically reduce the product selection available to law-abiding
consumers in California," said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF senior vice
president and general counsel. "Many manufacturers will choose to abandon
the California market rather than incur substantial costs associated with
complying with microstamping legislation, which would include purchasing
(at monopolistic prices) very expensive equipment and patented technology
and completely redesigning their manufacturing processes, plant and
equipment."
While it is not any particular manufacturer, it is the manufacturer's mouthpiece / lobbyist. If they say the manufacturers aren't going to re-tool then I believe them.

I'm a former LEO. I've never been imbued with the mindset that as a LEO I was among "God's Chosen Few", a phrase that was used extensively in my academy class a couple of decades back. What is it, as a LEO, that makes me any better than any law abiding citizen? I've never understood that. And it seems to me that in Silveira there was a ruling that otherwise honorably retired LEOs weren't anything special as concerned so called "assault weapons". So why should LEO's be any different when it comes to the roster?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-11-2007, 6:19 PM
bulgron bulgron is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Santa Clara County
Posts: 2,784
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

It seems like Arnold only has a few days to veto this thing if he's going to do it. Am I right?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-11-2007, 6:43 PM
CSDGuy CSDGuy is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,755
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Yes, he has until the 14th to sign or veto it. Otherwise, if he takes no action, it will become law. Maryland IS the state that is doing the Ballistic Fingerprinting. That system has only assisted in getting a single conviction. Without that system, the conviction still would have happened. This system is so expensive and has generated so little in the way of results that the MSP is calling for it to be dismantled.

Unlike the microprinting bill, this only requires that 2 shots be fired, the brass from those shots be collected and then sent in to the lab when the firearm is first sold. The lab images the brass at that time. That system is NOT dependent upon special tooling or any modifications to any manufacturing tooling. It's all on the lab side and depends only on the brass being captured and put with the correct pistol that fired that brass.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-11-2007, 7:00 PM
CCWFacts CCWFacts is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5,612
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

The right way to do all this is with isotopic labeling of ammo components: bullets, powder, primers and brass. If you pick the right isotopes, you could easily encode 16 bits (or more) of info in all those components, giving 65,000 unique identifiers. That wouldn't identify bullets individually but it could identify batches individually, and that's enough to track to the store where the ammo was sold.

Doing this would make no difference in the final price of the ammo and it wouldn't require retooling of factors or supply chains.

It wouldn't allow individual traceability of bullets or ammo but it would give enough information to help prosecutors prove things like the type of ammo and batch, which would be a real help in cases.

It would also let us track environmental impact of lead.

Something like this could and should be done voluntarily by the major manufacturers. No legislation would be needed, except maybe some liability protection for them if they do this.

Isotopic labeling would be impossible to remove, and difficult to tamper with. It's not fool-proof; someone would always be able to find non-labeled stuff somewhere. But none of these labeling systems are fool-proof, and obviously the microstamping stuff is so easy to defeat it's worthless.
__________________
I will spit whenever I hear the word Libertarian from now on.

In the 2016 election, Libertarian voters threw the swing states of Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico, Minnesota, New Hampshire, and Maine to Hillary, for a total of 38 electoral college votes. Hillary would have created a permanent a permanent entitlement class and permanent Democratic control over the US.

Last edited by CCWFacts; 10-11-2007 at 7:02 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-11-2007, 10:06 PM
JALLEN JALLEN is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Free state now
Posts: 497
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

It would be too much to hope for, if this absurd bill becomes law, that the manufacturers that refuse to tool up to be able to sell CA legal weapons would do like Ronnie Barratt and tell CA LE to jump in the lake when they want to buy guns and service. I understand that Barratt refused to service any of his .50 BMG guns already sold, and refused to sell any more to CA LE.

I wonder what would happen if they sent out an RFP and nobody offered to sell any guns? Nobody, nadda, zippo. The manufacturers forbade their dealers from selling as well. Then what?

Maybe the police, sheriffs and highway patrol could borrow some sling shots from the TJ police department while the Legislature got it sorted out.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 3:07 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.