![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
FFL's Forum For open discussion between FFLs and polite questions for FFLs. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
According to the chart below If a semi auto rifle is longer than 26" and is AR type And was not registered as AW and listed in either appx b or c is violative of the penal code.
Question, DPMS is listed in appx B and it's AR type, then how is it that there are post ban ca legal models? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The markings need to match the exact make/model of what is list and the CA legal variants do not match the exact make/model of what is banned. Since, it is not make/model banned, they just need to be configured so that they do not features that would classify them as an assault weapon. Examples: (make) DPMS (model) Panther = make/model banned (make) DPMS (model) Oracle = not make/model banned & can be made CA legal (make) Colt (model) AR-15 = make/model banned (make) Colt (model) M-4 = not make/model banned & can be made CA legal (make) Olympic Arms (model) PCR = make/model banned (make) Olympic Arms (model) MFR = not make/model banned & can be made CA legal |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
[Carol Ann voice]The Legislature is baaa-ack .... [/Carol Ann voice] There is no value at all complaining or analyzing or reading tea leaves to decide what these bills really mean or actually do; any bill with a chance to pass will be bad for gun owners. The details only count after the Governor signs the bills. Not a lawyer, just Some Guy On The Interwebs. ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
On AR15 type firearms: 1. The lower receiver is considered the firearm and is what is make/model banned. 2. The upper receiver is just a part and is not make/model ban. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |