Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04-2013, 7:09 AM
OUC OUC is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: LA
Posts: 87
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default LA Mayoral Candidates - Which one

I've been trying to find which candidate for Mayor will be the least likely to attack my 2A rights. I've not been able to find their stand on their websites. I feel that a candidates position on gun control may also mirror their positions on other issues. So does anyone one know?


Candidate are:
Eric Garcettit
Jan Perry
Emanuel Pleitez
Wendy Gruel
Addie Miller
Kevin James
Norton Sandler
Yehuda Draiman
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-04-2013, 7:11 AM
P.Charm P.Charm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: in a bomb shelter north of the US/Mexico boarder
Posts: 1,450
iTrader: 16 / 100%
Default

I would suggest to email each of them and ask them their stand on 2A. and check with the CRPA website to see what info they have on them.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-2013, 7:39 AM
Vlad 11's Avatar
Vlad 11 Vlad 11 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: S.F.V.
Posts: 2,783
iTrader: 20 / 100%
Default

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-04-2013, 7:47 AM
Raiz Raiz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 125
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlad 11 View Post
We might as well try to pick the candidate that best supports our views. So who is the worst of the bunch? Which are the least offensive ones?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-04-2013, 8:35 AM
cfm117's Avatar
cfm117 cfm117 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Woodland Hills
Posts: 419
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Outside of 2A issues, Kevin James is the most logical. All the main players except one are entrenched and corrupted city insiders ,who are Villar bootlickers and are all bought and paid for by labor, mainly Gruell.
__________________


"Every gun makes it's own tune." - Blondie

Last edited by cfm117; 03-04-2013 at 8:38 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-04-2013, 9:29 AM
aimstr8's Avatar
aimstr8 aimstr8 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 60
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Garcetti and Gruell BOTH support dianne fienstiens terrible views. I called both and asked their policy dept.

If anyone finds a good choice for Mayor let us know....I wanna vote for someone who supports 2A!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-04-2013, 9:31 AM
supportliberty supportliberty is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default Yj Draiman is a huge supporter of the 2nd Amendment

I did a bunch of research and the only L.A. mayoral candidate that supports the 2A is Draiman. Here's a repost of one of his comments -


YJ Draiman • 2 years ago

We have the Constitutional Right to Bear Arms and Defend Ourselves - 2nd Amendment

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

It is a right not a privilege, just like you have the right to live and breath.

Right to Bear Arms is an unalienable right; it cannot be given to someone by someone else, they already have it at birth, and thus, it cannot be taken away no matter how good the reason seems to be.

"Do not punish or deny the rights of the masses for the sins of the few"

This applies to any and all rights and privileges stated in the Constitution of the United States.


The Second Amendment is one of our most cherished. The right to keep and bear arms is what keeps government subservient to its citizenry. Without the right to bear arms, we would have anarchy in the streets, the criminals would still have guns, and violent crime would escalate.

Thomas Paine:
"Arms, like laws, discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property."
We plan on exercising these rights to the fullest extent of the Constitutional Law.

Our society today is brainwashed that when some people abuse their constitutional rights we must punish all of society and revoke that right and privilege.

When some one uses a weapon, any weapon, gun, knife, pick, ax, saw, car, etc. they get prosecuted, when convicted, they are sentenced not all the people of the country.

Abuse by some people has been going on since creation and will continue till the end of time. We must control and punish the abusers, not the whole society.

Case and point is the punishment society is taking today due to terrorism. Since governments are helpless to fight and control terrorism they punish the masses in the name of safety and cause extreme economic hardship and the loss of our constitutional liberties.

There are Nations that under their Laws citizens are permitted to posses firearms. Check out some of those countries. Crime rate has not increased. Abuses happen, the abusers are punished and not the rest of society.

It is a known historical fact that the Criminal will always find a way to get a weapon.

Restricting the average citizen from having a weapon to protect himself and his family, leaves the door open to the criminal to violate those citizens, due to the knowledge that the average citizen has no weapon and cannot protect himself and his family.

A weapon is a tool like any other tool and should be used properly.

A knife, pick, ax, saw, car, etc. is also a tool that must be used properly. It is not outlawed, is it?

A car in today's society is an absolute must. Do the citizens of this country know how many people are killed and injured by automobiles every year, it amounts to thousands, which is much less than with guns.

And to those who would say this was but a "temporary violation" for the greater good, Ben Franklin admonishes;

"THOSE WHO WOULD GIVE UP LIBERTIES TO OBTAIN FREEDOM DESERVE NEITHER.

Folks, we live in dangerous times, a government that does not trust its citizens to bear arms, is a government not to be trusted by its citizens.

As the threat to all of our liberties continue basically unabated, remember the words of the great political philosopher Edmund Burke; "The only way for evil men to prosper is for good men to do nothing."

The right to keep and bear arms should be of great importance to all Americans, if we are to remain a free country we MUST NOT let this right be taken from us
Remember, freedom isn't free. God Bless you, and God, please bless the United States of America.

By: YJ Draiman, Northridge, CA

PS
The Supreme Court ruled on the Heller case at the end of its term in June, 2008. The Court, which found for Heller in a close 5-4 decision, wrote that the 2nd Amendment did, in fact, protect an individual right. While the court was careful to note that the case did not call into question any laws that regulate guns, it did state, unequivocally, that Heller and his fellow petitioners had a right to own guns in their home. The Court also ruled that while reasonable regulation may be permitted, the requirement that guns be locked and disassembled was not reasonable.

Supreme Court affirms fundamental right to bear arms
Tuesday, June 29, 2010;
MCDONALD v. CHICAGO Syllabus
The Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment right, recognized in Heller, to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self defense. Pp. 5–9, 11–19, 19–33.
The Second Amendment provides Americans a fundamental right to bear arms that cannot be violated by state and local governments, the Supreme Court ruled Monday in a long-sought victory for gun rights advocates.
The 5 to 4 decision does not strike down any gun-control laws, nor does it elaborate on what kind of laws would offend the Constitution. One justice predicted that an "avalanche" of lawsuits would be filed across the country asking federal judges to define the boundaries of gun ownership and government regulation.
But Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., who wrote the opinion for the court's dominant conservatives, said: "It is clear that the Framers . . . counted the right to keep and bear arms among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty."
The decision extended the court's 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller that "the Second Amendment protects a personal right to keep and bear arms for lawful purposes, most notably for self-defense within the home." That decision applied only to federal laws and federal enclaves such as Washington; it was the first time the court had said there was an individual right to gun ownership rather than one related to military service.

Last edited by supportliberty; 03-04-2013 at 9:34 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-05-2013, 5:03 PM
Cataclyzm's Avatar
Cataclyzm Cataclyzm is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

I spoke with draiman and he supports the 2nd Amendment. He said that stripping law abiding citizens of their firearms only strengthens criminals. Look at Chicago. I voted for him.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:17 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.