Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > FIREARMS DISCUSSIONS > Centerfire Rifles - Semiautomatic or Gas Operated
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Centerfire Rifles - Semiautomatic or Gas Operated Centerfire rifles, carbines and other gas operated rifles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 12-09-2012, 6:00 PM
rksimple's Avatar
rksimple rksimple is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: T-Town
Posts: 6,218
iTrader: 11 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pthfndr View Post
LOL James!

And how many times have YOU won the TBRC? Always a bridesmaid, never a bride
BAM! Lmfao!
__________________
GAP Team Shooter 5
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 12-09-2012, 6:20 PM
DirtRacer151's Avatar
DirtRacer151 DirtRacer151 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 2,353
iTrader: 30 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pthfndr View Post
LOL James!

And how many times have YOU won the TBRC? Always a bridesmaid, never a bride
Quote:
Originally Posted by rksimple View Post
BAM! Lmfao!


Everyone gets lucky every now and then. I've got him beat 2 out of 3 times i've shot TBRC though.


No, honestly Ryans a bad mamma jamma. I value his advice on technique far more then his advice on equipment. 1 Premier and 2 Schmidt & Benders later and i finally got lucky with his last flavor of the week (Nightforce).
__________________


Visit our forum at- http://www.socalprecisionforum.com/index.php


Become a SoCal Precision Rifle Team fan on Facebook- http://www.facebook.com/groups/SoCalPrecisionRifleTeam
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 12-09-2012, 7:56 PM
jtv3062's Avatar
jtv3062 jtv3062 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,037
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kendog4570 View Post
What pros?
These guys are competitors and gamers (mighty good ones).

I would think the “Pros” use whatever their organization tells them to.
I'm with kendog. I know those guys at the hide don't throw around the word sniper freely.
__________________
Do not fear the enemy, for your enemy can only take your life. It is far better that you fear the media, for they will steal your Honour

Let's pray for Obama Psalm 109:8

Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
Love me some tube steaks.


Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 12-09-2012, 10:51 PM
gunprofit's Avatar
gunprofit gunprofit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 525
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default

Joker, thanks for posting. Its interesting to see what is used. I really don't care what they are called. These are people who are pushing the envelope on long range accuracy. To me, the equipment they use is interesting.

There was a time when I created and ran matches, mostly handgun. I tried to get professional people to participate. Usually they got their butts beat and then the whine started about gamers vs. Professionals. The big difference was that one practiced, practiced, practiced. The other whined.

Anyway, I am always interested in equipment that is developed to push the limits.
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 12-09-2012, 11:02 PM
WordVirus WordVirus is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 28
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kendog4570 View Post
I don't think so. These guys do a whole bunch of various scenarios including paper, gongs, unknown distance and angles, time/stress constraints, canted rifle shooting, etc. IPSC plus, with rifles, if you will. It aint easy. BUT, it is a game. Try shooting a 8" x 12" target at 200 yards with your rifle turned 90 degrees to vertical alignment.
My only point is they are not "professionals".
I'm a newb as far as shooting goes, but have been told I have innate ability, and I can shoot(and ring) 200 yrds with my iron sights at a 12" gong. wonder where there is a range that has 90 degree "vertical" alignment at 200 yrds .... shooting into a canyon? I wouldn't call 200 yrds "long range" even as a rookie... esp if they are using optics which probably cost as much as my M&P15
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 12-09-2012, 11:13 PM
WordVirus WordVirus is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 28
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WordVirus View Post
I'm a newb as far as shooting goes, but have been told I have innate ability, and I can shoot(and ring) 200 yrds with my iron sights at a 12" gong. wonder where there is a range that has 90 degree "vertical" alignment at 200 yrds .... shooting into a canyon? I wouldn't call 200 yrds "long range" even as a rookie... esp if they are using optics which probably cost as much as my M&P15
wow... Jesus, nevermind. As I read more in this post, it seems like there are some very differing views on this subject. Just saying tho, 200 yrds ain't *****...
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 12-10-2012, 11:31 AM
postal postal is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Riverside
Posts: 4,592
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WordVirus View Post
I'm a newb as far as shooting goes, but have been told I have innate ability, and I can shoot(and ring) 200 yrds with my iron sights at a 12" gong. wonder where there is a range that has 90 degree "vertical" alignment at 200 yrds .... shooting into a canyon? I wouldn't call 200 yrds "long range" even as a rookie... esp if they are using optics which probably cost as much as my M&P15
You mis understood.... He meant turn the rifle sideways 'gansta style'. It really throws you off with a scope until you learn how to deal with it. -----edit. This is to simulate shooting underneath a car, where you dont have clearance to hold the rifle normally. This was actually done by LEO during the North Hollywood bank robbery shoot out, but they were using AR15/m16's...--- end edit---

There are places that have steep angle shooting, and the snipers hide cup has a tower- they leaned out over the edge shooting at a very small target straight down about ?6 stories? below them. Scoped rifle very close shots are difficult as well until you know your scope, and how to hit them. 25 yards will really throw someone off with a 100 yd zero until you know how to do it. Then try pointing your rifle straight down and hitting one on the ground below you for something new...

As a beginner, 12" gong at 200 with irons is decent. I've seen high power competitors with quality iron peep sights knock out the peg from the target marker at 600 yards.... Dude hit the exact same hole like 3 times in 30 shots at 600 yds with irons.... I started running out of pegs since he shot them up and I couldnt find them..

Last edited by postal; 12-10-2012 at 3:35 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 12-10-2012, 11:49 AM
phish's Avatar
phish phish is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,086
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

^ must've gotten your attention as well, exploding spindles have a different sound to them
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 12-10-2012, 3:16 PM
postal postal is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Riverside
Posts: 4,592
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

They were plastic.... First time, I musta just stood there drop jawed when the marker fell to my feet with no peg...

2nd and 3rd time, just shaking my head laughing.... hardly believing it... Except I had to hurry trying to find another peg so he could see the marker through the spotting scope..

Last edited by postal; 12-10-2012 at 3:18 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 12-10-2012, 8:39 PM
Vu 308's Avatar
Vu 308 Vu 308 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 2,380
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

LOL...a friend of mine linked me to this thread.

That last thing we needed for this sport was a thread that labeled the men and women that shoot it as "snipers"....thanks OP..great work there bud.

As pointed out in previous posts, these stats were pulled from the Precision Rifle Series, not from snipers in the field.

6.5s and 6mm hotrods dominate this game, period. If you think your 308win rolling 175s @ 2600 will compete against a 260rem or 243, you're high.

Here is the SureFire video from our 2012 NorCal TBRC SureFire Invitational. Mike Cecil with CSTactical will have his media ready to go soon as well. I will post here once it is ready.

We're not HP shooters by any means...total different game.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2VXdTLlmfU
__________________


Please visit us @ www.ncpprc.com for more info.
Reply With Quote
  #131  
Old 12-10-2012, 9:55 PM
kendog4570's Avatar
kendog4570 kendog4570 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oakhurst, CA
Posts: 3,280
iTrader: 16 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WordVirus View Post
I'm a newb as far as shooting goes, but have been told I have innate ability, and I can shoot(and ring) 200 yrds with my iron sights at a 12" gong. wonder where there is a range that has 90 degree "vertical" alignment at 200 yrds .... shooting into a canyon? I wouldn't call 200 yrds "long range" even as a rookie... esp if they are using optics which probably cost as much as my M&P15
200 is not long range. It is considered short range in NRA highpower. The sideways thing is supposed to simulate shooting from a barricade or from something like under a vehicle where the shooter doesnt have the space or time to get the rifle in the normal firing position. I dont shoot tac stuff, it doesnt really interest me as much as other types of competition, but the way this competition is set up it is quite tough.

Imagine an 8" by 12" gong at 200 yards, and take your rifle with a good known 200 yard zero and lay it over 90 degrees, and tell me where you would have to hold to get a center hit. 12 " is 6 MOA at 200, and I bet the first time you won't be on the target at all.
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 12-13-2012, 1:44 PM
Vu 308's Avatar
Vu 308 Vu 308 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 2,380
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

While some of these guys are real world dudes, most are competitive shooters. Here are were some of these stats came from.

Special thanks to Mike Cecil with CS Tactical for producing this video of our event.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHFfR_k_kfs
__________________


Please visit us @ www.ncpprc.com for more info.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 12-13-2012, 1:58 PM
DirtRacer151's Avatar
DirtRacer151 DirtRacer151 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 2,353
iTrader: 30 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vu 308 View Post
While some of these guys are real world dudes, most are competitive shooters. Here are were some of these stats came from.

Special thanks to Mike Cecil with CS Tactical for producing this video of our event.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHFfR_k_kfs
Another bad *** video!

Thanks again for the awesome match!!

I need to bribe Mikey for some extra face time on the next video
__________________


Visit our forum at- http://www.socalprecisionforum.com/index.php


Become a SoCal Precision Rifle Team fan on Facebook- http://www.facebook.com/groups/SoCalPrecisionRifleTeam
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 12-17-2012, 1:44 AM
roostersgt roostersgt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: 5200'
Posts: 1,222
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

I just found this site and found this to be an interesting thread. I'm not trying to stir the pot, or jump into a fight with anyone, but hope I can add a bit to the conversation.

A lot can be said of the long range rounds being used today and discussed in this thread. What can not be said is that they are "new" calibers. The 6mm and 6.5 Creedmore and its variants have been around nearly 40 years. They are a very fast and flat shooting round, especially with the advancements made in propellants. I believe a major reason most of this calibers shooters state they use the 6mm rounds is due to less recoil. Isn't the brass based on the .243 case? I recently met a highly ranked shooter, named Keith Gratias, who stated it's his favorite round for that very reason.

I recently retired from a large sheriff's department and have had the opportunity to work with our "snipers" and many other agencies "snipers", including a few military snipers (SEAL, Ranger) who assist with providing training. Every single "paid" LE sniper and agency I'm aware of uses the .308, along with our military snipers (+.50cal). Our latest platform is an AR-10 based one and is expected in a couple of weeks. We've discontinued the model700 BOLT platform, in that it was deemed inferior. None of the paid "snipers" I know use anything except the .308 cal. Most police agencies can use whatever caliber they want, as money isn't really an issue for limited quantities of specialized equipment.

Most, and I do mean most, LE agencies snipers use Nightforce scopes. This is primarily due to their extreme durability and light gathering. Pricey yes, but when lives are on the line frugality is stupidity. Hornady TAP 165gr ammunition is the apparent standard.

A lot of "real world" ballistics information is available for .308. Penetration, separation, weight retention etc... how it performs through glass, metal, sheetrock, wooden doors, bodies etc... Perhaps someday, as more relevant information is obtained on the 6mm rounds for "sniper" suitability, it may well become the .308's replacement. Paper targets, metal plates and such are for competition. Just my two cents.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 12-17-2012, 4:37 AM
bridgeport bridgeport is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Burbank
Posts: 697
iTrader: 36 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roostersgt View Post
I just found this site and found this to be an interesting thread. I'm not trying to stir the pot, or jump into a fight with anyone, but hope I can add a bit to the conversation.

A lot can be said of the long range rounds being used today and discussed in this thread. What can not be said is that they are "new" calibers. The 6mm and 6.5 Creedmore and its variants have been around nearly 40 years. They are a very fast and flat shooting round, especially with the advancements made in propellants. I believe a major reason most of this calibers shooters state they use the 6mm rounds is due to less recoil. Isn't the brass based on the .243 case? I recently met a highly ranked shooter, named Keith Gratias, who stated it's his favorite round for that very reason.

I recently retired from a large sheriff's department and have had the opportunity to work with our "snipers" and many other agencies "snipers", including a few military snipers (SEAL, Ranger) who assist with providing training. Every single "paid" LE sniper and agency I'm aware of uses the .308, along with our military snipers (+.50cal). Our latest platform is an AR-10 based one and is expected in a couple of weeks. We've discontinued the model700 BOLT platform, in that it was deemed inferior. None of the paid "snipers" I know use anything except the .308 cal. Most police agencies can use whatever caliber they want, as money isn't really an issue for limited quantities of specialized equipment.

Most, and I do mean most, LE agencies snipers use Nightforce scopes. This is primarily due to their extreme durability and light gathering. Pricey yes, but when lives are on the line frugality is stupidity. Hornady TAP 165gr ammunition is the apparent standard.

A lot of "real world" ballistics information is available for .308. Penetration, separation, weight retention etc... how it performs through glass, metal, sheetrock, wooden doors, bodies etc... Perhaps someday, as more relevant information is obtained on the 6mm rounds for "sniper" suitability, it may well become the .308's replacement. Paper targets, metal plates and such are for competition. Just my two cents.
6MM has been around "for a while", no news here. Anybody into this stuff knows that.
Your information is a bit mixed up though on the .243, which is based on the .3o8 case, as is .260. Felt recoil is of little consideration though in a rifle with a brake, or suppressor.
Although you may like the "S" word, it really does not apply to tactical competition, nor for that matter to Law enforcement where the sharpshooter/ designated marksman works. No matter what a persons line of work or MOS, they are simply a competitor when playing in competition.
The Fact that .308 is a common LE/ military cartridge (notice I did not say Caliber) is, or should be, common knowledge.
Most shooters will use the best glass they can afford, NF, USO, S&B, unless through experience or sponsorship, they have determined there is a product the individual considers better suited to them.
Most Competition players shoot their own Handloads, a considerable time of which can be spent tweaking the components into harmony with their rifle.
There is plenty of real world ballistic information available for 6mm and 6.5, after all, these calibers have been around for a long time, as was noted.
Paper targets, and metal plates, are used by just about everybody, including LE, military, and competitors for training, and always have been. I think most shooters are aware of that.
__________________
"These truths we hold to be self evident".
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 12-17-2012, 11:46 AM
roostersgt roostersgt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: 5200'
Posts: 1,222
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default

I guess I just met the online resident "know-it-all / bully". Thanks. Now my opinion is once again confirmed about posting on online forums. You going to check my spelling too? I'm not going to bore the others with my credentials here, but suffice it to say, I know what I'm talking about in my post, except for the part where I asked about the 6mm being made from .243 cases, my bad. I'm leaving. You've proven what I've believed for a long time.
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 12-17-2012, 6:16 PM
Pthfndr's Avatar
Pthfndr Pthfndr is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns. Near Tahoe
Posts: 3,690
iTrader: 26 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by roostersgt View Post
I guess I just met the online resident "know-it-all / bully". Thanks. Now my opinion is once again confirmed about posting on online forums. You going to check my spelling too? I'm not going to bore the others with my credentials here, but suffice it to say, I know what I'm talking about in my post, except for the part where I asked about the 6mm being made from .243 cases, my bad. I'm leaving. You've proven what I've believed for a long time.
Well, it's too bad you decided to leave. If you have professional experience and valid opinion to offer you are welcome to (and should) give it.

One of the problems with the internet is there are a great many people who say they have "the credentials" to back up what they say, when in fact they do not, and are just espousing what they've read on the internet. Not saying that is the case with you, just that it happens.

While no one really expects you to reveal your real name, it would certainly go a long way towards your credibility if you did say what agency you served with, when, and in what capacity.......There are a lot of LE/MIL people on this forum, and some of them might actually know you, and you them, and can vouch for the knowledge expressed.

While what you've stated is not necessarily untrue, it's not wholly accurate either. That may just be a consequence of your participation within a single agency. I know for a fact from actually seeing it that one of northern CA's larger SO swat sniper team has equipment on par with what someone on a severely restricted budget would buy for their first "sniper" rifle. None of it high end at all.
__________________
Rob Thomas - Match Director NCPPRC Tactical Long Range Match

Match Director Sac Valley Vintage Military Rifle Long Range Match
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 2:26 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.