Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > FIREARMS DISCUSSIONS > Rimfire Firearms
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Rimfire Firearms .22, .17 and other Rimfire Handguns and Rifles

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-20-2011, 6:42 PM
Norinco522 Norinco522 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 241
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default Ruger 22/45 Threaded Barrel

So I want to buy the new Ruger 22/45, with no sights, a Picatinny rail on top, an accessory Picatinny rail on the bottom, and a threaded barrel. I should be able to SSE it through a local gun shop, using a longer barrel and magazine block. My question is, will Red Loctite do for locking the thread protector onto the barrel threads and thus avoiding breaking the assault weapon law? After it gets sent to the FFL for the SSE, can they just put Loctite on the thread protector before handing it to me? I've heard that the Walther P22 went through this fiasco, and the DOJ said Loctite would do the job, but I want to know if it will work for the Ruger 22/45.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-20-2011, 6:55 PM
ojisan's Avatar
ojisan ojisan is offline
Agent 86
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SFV
Posts: 9,427
iTrader: 41 / 100%
Default

The Walther P22 was a DOJ "ooops" so it got special consideration.
The definition of permanent as in "permanently attached" is not in CA law.
Fed law for barrel extensions requires welding or blind pinning with a weld over the pin hole to be considered permanent.
Red loctite is not likely to be enough to satisfy CA for use on a 22/45.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-20-2011, 7:04 PM
Merc1138 Merc1138 is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,466
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Even though there is the matter of the P22, I wouldn't want to end up in a test case against a different gun using the same logic that the DOJ did(we all know logic is not their strongpoint).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 6:04 AM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2016, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.