Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-2011, 10:55 PM
vladbutsky's Avatar
vladbutsky vladbutsky is offline
In Memoriam
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 305
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Post The Secret History of Guns (Adam Winkler, Atlantic magazine)

Very interesting reading about history of gun control. Author is trying to do honest analysis of the past gun control laws and people/organizations that supported or opposed it.

Quote:
The Ku Klux Klan, Ronald Reagan, and, for most of its history, the NRA all worked to control guns. The Founding Fathers? They required gun ownership—and regulated it. And no group has more fiercely advocated the right to bear loaded weapons in public than the Black Panthers—the true pioneers of the modern pro-gun movement. In the battle over gun rights in America, both sides have distorted history and the law, and there’s no resolution in sight.


By ADAM WINKLER
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/...f-guns/8608/1/
__________________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)

Last edited by Librarian; 08-16-2011 at 7:42 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-09-2011, 11:00 PM
Ubermcoupe's Avatar
Ubermcoupe Ubermcoupe is offline
🇺🇸 jack-booted gov thug
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: This information has been redacted in accordance with Title 18 U.S. Code § 798
Posts: 15,046
iTrader: 65 / 100%
Blog Entries: 2
Default

I don't know, a little bit of a logical fallacy to me. Albeit true, there is no explanation for some of the examples, seems like us "gun nuts" are made out to be, well... nuts.

I prefer my american example, 1776 Colonies v. England when discussing gun control
__________________
Hauoli Makahiki Hou


-------
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-09-2011, 11:05 PM
Dreaded Claymore Dreaded Claymore is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,237
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

I'm so glad someone mentioned the Black Panthers in connection with gun rights.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-09-2011, 11:14 PM
Stonewalker's Avatar
Stonewalker Stonewalker is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 2,783
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Just for reference, Adam Winkler is an antigunner. He writes an antigun blog for the Huffington Post.

He is correct that the KKK have tried to restrict arms in the past, and they have been successful. Along with several State's governments. Heck, our very own CA government passed our Carry License law in 1923 with the sole intention of invalidating county-based carry licenses and disarming the Chinese and the Latinos. See this SF Chronicle article from 1924 for reference.

Gun Control has always been aimed at disarming the "lower" classes throughout history. Our movement is a movement to ensure the rights of all people in this country (and perhaps beyond) to own and bear arms and therefore have effective means of self-defense against crime and tyranny.


*******************
ETA: I've somewhat reformed my words form this post. Check post #10 for more info on my stance.
__________________
member: Electronic Frontier Foundation, NRA, CGF

Deer Hunting Rifles? "Let's get rid of those too" - Adam Keigwin, Chief of Staff for Senator Leland Yee

Last edited by Stonewalker; 08-09-2011 at 11:47 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-09-2011, 11:19 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,362
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Adam is a ConLaw professor at UCLA, good guy and very smart. While he is quite rational we still disagree on many aspects of gun laws etc. You should be following him on Twitter @AdamWinkler and try to attend his Tuesday twitter seminars (search for #twem to read past "tweminars") they are great discussions on constitutional law and often cover gun laws and policy.

You should pre-order his book "Gunfight" on Amazon.

If you're lurking here, hello Adam....
__________________
Coyote Point Armory
341 Beach Road
Burlingame CA 94010
650-315-2210
http://CoyotePointArmory.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-09-2011, 11:22 PM
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,485
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Calling Adam Winkler anti-gun overstates his position. He is the first honest individual on "the other side" I've found such that I'm not so sure he's really on the other side. Said another way, his side of the debate is generally worrying him more than ours.

Now often you will see him in public foster socratic debate which has him take positions he himself doesn't find fully tenable. Note that a tweet of his was used in our side's filings in Ezell that supported the eventual outcome we all saw.

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-09-2011, 11:23 PM
vladbutsky's Avatar
vladbutsky vladbutsky is offline
In Memoriam
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 305
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ubermcoupe View Post
I don't know, a little bit of a logical fallacy to me. Albeit true, there is no explanation for some of the examples, seems like us "gun nuts" are made out to be, well... nuts.

I prefer my american example, 1776 Colonies v. England when discussing gun control
Well, we are representing an extreme view on gun control by the definition of the very word "extreme". So if author is not strongly for or against guns, he will see us as sort of "nuts"

But overall the article feels balanced and intellectually honest.

The author is coming out with a book this September. Probably more will be explained and more facts will be given in the book.
Quote:
Adam Winkler is a professor of constitutional law at UCLA law school. This article is adapted from his forthcoming book, Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America, to be published by W. W. Norton in September.
__________________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-09-2011, 11:25 PM
G60's Avatar
G60 G60 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hanford
Posts: 3,987
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default

That article is an excerpt from his book 'Gunfight'.

He has spoken at Brady campaign events, but he does not toe the line, and called out Ladd Everitt of the CSGV when mr Everitt dismissed claims of gun control laws being passed to disarm minorities as 'insurrectionist propaganda'
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-09-2011, 11:30 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,362
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G60 View Post
That article is an excerpt from his book 'Gunfight'.
Didn't realize that was an excerpt.

As Gene said, Adam seems intellectually honest and we can use more of that type of research on both sides of the debate.
__________________
Coyote Point Armory
341 Beach Road
Burlingame CA 94010
650-315-2210
http://CoyotePointArmory.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-09-2011, 11:37 PM
Stonewalker's Avatar
Stonewalker Stonewalker is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 2,783
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Oi, by the time I did adequate research on Adam Winkler and got back here I had already been rebuffed. Damn my large mouth! I have read a couple articles/opinion pieces by him on the Huffpo in the past and being the no-compromise/divisive site that the Huffpo is, I associated him with the anti-gunners. Adam, I apologize for my over-broad statement and to the rest of you, I apologize as well. I tried to make it black-and-white in this case and have been confronted with the fact that life is often-times not so easy.

I will read Gunfight, I will read more articles by him and I will take a more humble stance. Again, sorry for my words One other mistake I made - I assumed that Adam Winkler was part of the anti-gun blog - "The Gun Guys" ( I Can't seem to find them now, but they were an astro-turf website set-up to promote gun control under the guise of pro-gunners). They had an article called "The Racist Roots of the NRA"... I assumed this article was part of that BS. I'm sorry again.

Ok, now to ACTUALLY read the article that the OP posted...
__________________
member: Electronic Frontier Foundation, NRA, CGF

Deer Hunting Rifles? "Let's get rid of those too" - Adam Keigwin, Chief of Staff for Senator Leland Yee
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-10-2011, 7:38 AM
goodlookin1's Avatar
goodlookin1 goodlookin1 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,529
iTrader: 19 / 100%
Default

I thought the article was interesting. I couldnt really extract how the author really feels about gun control, but it seems he does understand the true history and roots of gun control.

I disagree with him in his understanding of what the founding fathers envisioned as far as gun control goes, however. If the framers believed what he said they did, then they wouldnt have written the 2nd Amendment the way they did, which includes no infringement on individual ownership of arms. The militia is the "well regulated" part....not the people.
__________________
www.FirearmReviews.net
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-10-2011, 8:55 AM
GrayWolf09 GrayWolf09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,621
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

He certainly builds a strong case for the Second Amendment establishing an individual right to own firearms.
__________________
http://i1127.photobucket.com/albums/...lf09/18829.jpg http://i1127.photobucket.com/albums/...lf09/index.jpg

Those who are afraid of the truth always seek to suppress it!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-10-2011, 1:55 PM
G60's Avatar
G60 G60 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hanford
Posts: 3,987
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrayWolf09 View Post
He certainly builds a strong case for the Second Amendment establishing an individual right to own firearms.
Heller already decided that, and McDonald applied it to the states, so no further case need be made as far as the courts go.
__________________
"Any unarmed people are slaves, or are subject to slavery at any given moment." - Dr. Huey P. Newton
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-10-2011, 2:49 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,362
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonewalker View Post
Oi, by the time I did adequate research on Adam Winkler and got back here I had already been rebuffed. Damn my large mouth! I have read a couple articles/opinion pieces by him on the Huffpo in the past and being the no-compromise/divisive site that the Huffpo is, I associated him with the anti-gunners. Adam, I apologize for my over-broad statement and to the rest of you, I apologize as well. I tried to make it black-and-white in this case and have been confronted with the fact that life is often-times not so easy.

I will read Gunfight, I will read more articles by him and I will take a more humble stance. Again, sorry for my words One other mistake I made - I assumed that Adam Winkler was part of the anti-gun blog - "The Gun Guys" ( I Can't seem to find them now, but they were an astro-turf website set-up to promote gun control under the guise of pro-gunners). They had an article called "The Racist Roots of the NRA"... I assumed this article was part of that BS. I'm sorry again.

Ok, now to ACTUALLY read the article that the OP posted...
You should also follow his twitter feed (@adamwinkler) he is a real constitutional scholar with a special interest in the 2A, not an anti-gunner trying to use the constitution to justify his position. In many ways Adam represents the future of the gun rights v gun control battle.
__________________
Coyote Point Armory
341 Beach Road
Burlingame CA 94010
650-315-2210
http://CoyotePointArmory.com
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-10-2011, 4:48 PM
GrayWolf09 GrayWolf09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,621
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G60 View Post
Heller already decided that, and McDonald applied it to the states, so no further case need be made as far as the courts go.
You obviously did not read the briefs in McDonald. A number of people are trying to re-litigate Heller.
__________________
http://i1127.photobucket.com/albums/...lf09/18829.jpg http://i1127.photobucket.com/albums/...lf09/index.jpg

Those who are afraid of the truth always seek to suppress it!

Last edited by GrayWolf09; 08-10-2011 at 4:51 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-14-2011, 7:39 PM
Can't buy anything here's Avatar
Can't buy anything here Can't buy anything here is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 752
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default Interesting gun article in the Atlantic...

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/...f-guns/8608/1/
__________________
3 day waiting period???? but I'm mad now!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-14-2011, 7:49 PM
sandwich sandwich is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 72
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default Dupe



http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...hlight=history
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-16-2011, 6:39 PM
Excelsior Excelsior is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California, thanks be to God!
Posts: 4,216
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default Stretch Your Brains a Bit -- Awesome Article!

Stretch Your Brains a Bit -- Awesome Article! I'll bet not 1 in 100 on this forum knows this history -- I certainly didn't.

Not 1 in 10 of you will actually read the entire article but for most of you that actually do, it will provide some real insight and some huge questions to ponder.

Most will simply (and ignorantly) dismiss it because it's a product of The Atlantic and that's just too bad. Others will simply give up after a few paragraphs because the information runs so contrary to their inculcated beliefs. In other words the information won't stretch their brains -- it will threaten to implode them.

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/...-of-guns/8608/
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-16-2011, 6:43 PM
HowardW56's Avatar
HowardW56 HowardW56 is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,871
iTrader: 20 / 100%
Default



http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...t=The+atlantic
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-16-2011, 6:52 PM
Excelsior Excelsior is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California, thanks be to God!
Posts: 4,216
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

GREAT article. I could see how it would bother many on these forums.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-16-2011, 7:26 PM
Ratboy Ratboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 225
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

I read this the other day. I found it to be interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-16-2011, 8:01 PM
tiko's Avatar
tiko tiko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 866
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Good to bring it up, I did not see the other threads
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-16-2011, 8:46 PM
radioman's Avatar
radioman radioman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Yucca Arizona
Posts: 1,804
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

this was a good read, his history was spot on, it made me think, that some day we might see an end to most gun control. after all it was to keep the blacks down. in 67 I lived in San Francisco and I remember the fear of the panthers, but I also remember my father, a democrat, saying. put a actor in office and lose your rights, and telling me that someday I would need a gun, and thanks to the republicans I would not have one.
__________________
"One useless man is called a disgrace, two become a law firm, and three or more become a Congress."
the new avatar is a painting from 1906, escape from San Francisco.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-16-2011, 9:21 PM
kperry kperry is offline
Member
CGN Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 191
iTrader: 9 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonewalker View Post
Oi, by the time I did adequate research on Adam Winkler and got back here I had already been rebuffed. Damn my large mouth! I have read a couple articles/opinion pieces by him on the Huffpo in the past and being the no-compromise/divisive site that the Huffpo is, I associated him with the anti-gunners. Adam, I apologize for my over-broad statement and to the rest of you, I apologize as well. I tried to make it black-and-white in this case and have been confronted with the fact that life is often-times not so easy.<snip>
Ok, now to ACTUALLY read the article that the OP posted...
Well-said apology, sir!- and I really wish that more of the threads on this site rose to the level of discussion we've had so far in this thread. The article is a very interesting, well-thought out read. I'll definitely be pre-ordering his book.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-16-2011, 10:58 PM
Andric's Avatar
Andric Andric is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: West LA
Posts: 214
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default

very good article. I hate having to argue against smart people, I wish he would go study the 4th amendment.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-16-2011, 11:05 PM
radioman's Avatar
radioman radioman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Yucca Arizona
Posts: 1,804
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andric View Post
very good article. I hate having to argue against smart people, I wish he would go study the 4th amendment.
The article did no harm to our fight, in fact I wish someone would post it on the Brady face book and web site. They need to know they are in step with the KKK, not good.
__________________
"One useless man is called a disgrace, two become a law firm, and three or more become a Congress."
the new avatar is a painting from 1906, escape from San Francisco.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-17-2011, 8:03 AM
Big Ben's Avatar
Big Ben Big Ben is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 723
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default

Interesting read. Threads like this are the reason that I frequent the 2A forum more than any other area of Calguns.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-17-2011, 10:01 AM
lhecker51's Avatar
lhecker51 lhecker51 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Formerly From People's Republic of Dumphucistan
Posts: 657
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffmang View Post
Calling Adam Winkler anti-gun overstates his position. He is the first honest individual on "the other side" I've found such that I'm not so sure he's really on the other side. Said another way, his side of the debate is generally worrying him more than ours.

Now often you will see him in public foster socratic debate which has him take positions he himself doesn't find fully tenable. Note that a tweet of his was used in our side's filings in Ezell that supported the eventual outcome we all saw.

-Gene
Agreed. Adam is a breath of needed fresh air and adds credibility to the debate. I welcome respectful debate that is based on fact and supported by logic and Adam meets that criteria in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-17-2011, 10:46 AM
Uxi's Avatar
Uxi Uxi is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,138
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

His conclusion about Scalia is a spurious and more than a little underhanded jab, going back to 1789-1791 but forgetting to include an important bit about 1868 that the Winkler himself already referenced earlier.
__________________
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -- Thomas Jefferson

9mm + 5.56mm =
.45ACP + 7.62 NATO =
10mm + 6.8 SPC =


Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis; Jn 1:14
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-02-2011, 3:29 PM
Mesa Tactical Mesa Tactical is offline
Vendor/Retailer
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Costa Mesa
Posts: 1,747
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Excelsior View Post
GREAT article. I could see how it would bother many on these forums.
I'll say.

“[There's} no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons.” -- Ronald Reagan.

Thanks, Gipper!
__________________
Lucy at www.mesatactical.com
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 09-02-2011, 6:03 PM
Knuckle Dragger's Avatar
Knuckle Dragger Knuckle Dragger is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 90
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

An outstanding article. Required reading for all.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-02-2011, 6:24 PM
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,485
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

The book is equally good or better. It's certainly a quick way to get up to speed to the McDonald decision.

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-02-2011, 6:24 PM
G60's Avatar
G60 G60 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hanford
Posts: 3,987
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default

I'm only 50 pages into the book, but it's just as good as the excerpt so far.

The chapter 'gun grabbers' was scathing, so much so that i was afraid to get to the next chapter 'gun nuts' (Mr. Winkler went no holds barred in criticism of gun-control extremists in the former chapter), yet the chapter on us 'gun nuts' so far seems very fair in comparison!

A recommended read indeed.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-02-2011, 6:46 PM
meaty-btz's Avatar
meaty-btz meaty-btz is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,980
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default

The Ruling class has never been anti-gun. They have ALWAYS, throughout the centuries been against the underclass and disenfranchised possessing arms. Though to be honest in some ways they are right. Some of the worst governments and situations were born of the underclass fomenting into revolution. American's revolution was not one driven by an underclass and of course the results differed from, oh say, the French Revolutions (note the PLURAL!) or many of the countries who have had revolutions in the last centuries, from Russia to China to many middle eastern countries.
__________________
...but their exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level, and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-02-2011, 6:55 PM
jak77's Avatar
jak77 jak77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 1,459
iTrader: 12 / 100%
Default

Tagged so I can read this when I get home.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 09-03-2011, 2:14 PM
vincewarde vincewarde is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,912
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffmang View Post
Calling Adam Winkler anti-gun overstates his position. He is the first honest individual on "the other side" I've found such that I'm not so sure he's really on the other side. Said another way, his side of the debate is generally worrying him more than ours.

Now often you will see him in public foster socratic debate which has him take positions he himself doesn't find fully tenable. Note that a tweet of his was used in our side's filings in Ezell that supported the eventual outcome we all saw.

-Gene
Gene THANK YOU for coming to the defense of an honest guy with whom we may disagree. I have also have followed Prof. Winkler and you are definitely correct. Sometimes he even ends up helping us.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 09-03-2011, 2:29 PM
Tripper's Avatar
Tripper Tripper is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Coast-Salinas
Posts: 7,755
iTrader: 102 / 100%
Default

1 in 10 may not read it
i'd bet less than 1 in 10 know what inculcated means
I'll admit i didnt, I was close in my assumption, but actually had to look that one up
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 09-03-2011, 2:30 PM
Tripper's Avatar
Tripper Tripper is offline
Calguns Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Coast-Salinas
Posts: 7,755
iTrader: 102 / 100%
Default

I'm referring to this post btw

Quote:
Originally Posted by Excelsior View Post
Stretch Your Brains a Bit -- Awesome Article! I'll bet not 1 in 100 on this forum knows this history -- I certainly didn't.

Not 1 in 10 of you will actually read the entire article but for most of you that actually do, it will provide some real insight and some huge questions to ponder.

Most will simply (and ignorantly) dismiss it because it's a product of The Atlantic and that's just too bad. Others will simply give up after a few paragraphs because the information runs so contrary to their inculcated beliefs. In other words the information won't stretch their brains -- it will threaten to implode them.

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/...-of-guns/8608/
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 09-03-2011, 3:28 PM
ruchik ruchik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,173
iTrader: 24 / 100%
Default

A very enlightening read. I myself did not know that the NRA used to support forms of gun control that we today find completely abhorrent. That's not to say I don't support the NRA's vision today, but it's good to know both sides of the story. It can only better arm you for whatever stance you decide to take and defend. This is the kind of rational debate and discussion BOTH sides, gun control and rights activists, should engage in, not just pointing fingers at each other. I believe if both sides presented their views like Professor Winkler did, more people who are not familiar with the gun control debate would be more inclined to weigh in and listen. As of right now, we've got gun nuts and gun-free-means-no-crime crusaders in the eyes of the rest of the population.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 09-03-2011, 4:37 PM
hoffmang hoffmang is offline
I need a LIFE!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Peninsula, Bay Area
Posts: 18,485
iTrader: 14 / 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ruchik View Post
As of right now, we've got gun nuts and gun-free-means-no-crime crusaders in the eyes of the rest of the population.
Chapter 2 of GunFight is entitled Gun Grabbers while chapter 3 is Gun Nuts.

The book is very good.

-Gene
__________________
Gene Hoffman
Chairman, The Calguns Foundation

DONATE NOW
to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @CalgunsFdn on Twitter.
Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


"The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 9:14 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
Calguns.net and The Calguns Foundation have no affiliation and are in no way related to each other.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.