Second Amendment Surprise Is Coming September 11, 2006

[donhamrick]

FROM DON HAMRICK (pro se civil plaintiff in Hamrick v. President Bush, et al, U.S. District Court/DC)
American Common Defence Review (blog)
http://americancommondefencereview.blogspot.com/

After 4 years of being jerked around the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in what began as a simple judicial review of a final agency action denial by the U.S. Coast Guard in 2002 that escalated into a RICO Act case alleging the United States Governmet of racketeering an unlawful and an unconstitutional protection scheme over the Second Amendment I finally called it quits with the federal courts in Washington, DC because the judicial bias and corruption is insurmountable.

I filed my motion to dismiss without prejudice and the Assistant U.S. Attorney Dennis Barghaan of Alexandria, Virginia conceded my right to dismiss my own case.

I have prepared a new and updated Civil RICO Act Complaint, 3 volumes, each at 1-inch thick (2,100 pages total, double-sided printing making for 1,050 sheets of paper for thickness of all 3 volumes) to be filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas (Little Rock), Northern Division (Batesville) on September 11, 2006.

The timing is part coincidental with the judicial events in Washington, DC and partly timed of symbolic publicity for September 11 - the want of a handgun in the cockpits of commerical airliners as all part of the racketeering allegations of government racketeering activities over the Second Amendment.

I spent about $400 on specialty law books on the RICO Act to be more proficient with my case than I have been these last 4 years. Right off the bat I learned from these law books that I am acting as a "private attorney general" (so says the U.S. Supreme Court in case law). Morever, I have the perfect standing to sue: Stigmatic Harm among other causes for standing.

I will be trying new tactics this time. I have the 3 stringient requirements for Mandamus relied in the bag! I have 4 years of memorandums in support of motion to dismiss from the government attorneys to which I have rebutted very nicely in my Civil RICO Act Complaint.

And by the grace of coincidence the American Bar Association on August 7th issued their recommend on "Civil Gideon" the right of civil litigants to court appointed attorneys. I have filed my motion as a civil plaintiff with a very complex civil RICO Act case to have a court appointed attorney profficient with the RICO Act and Second Amendment jurisprudence.

Remember! The U.S. Supreme Court case from 1939, United States v. Miller had its origin in the U.S. District Court for the WESTERN Division of Arkansas. Now here is my case for the Second Amendment in the U.S. District Court for the EASTERN District of Arkansas.

My case is a GOLD MINE for publicity for the NRA, Second Amendment Foundation, KeepAndBearArms.com, etc. etc. But because I am litigating for National Open Carry in intrastate and interstate travel all those gun rights advocacy groups ignored my case.

Monday will mark a new beginning in the fight for gun rights Whether Wayne LaPierre, Robert Dowlut, Allen Gottlieb and gang like it or not!

My case as about "actual freedom" under the Second, Fifth, Fourth, Ninth, Tenth, Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendmens and under the "Common Defence" clause of the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution from a U.S. merchant seaman's perspectie where I can us federal laws and regulations to my advantage.

The NRA's agenda for National Reciprocity for Concealed Carry is "bull********" (so says Alan Korwin, www.gunlaws.com)

Four years of litigating the Second Amendment on my own using my wages earned aboard ships at sea.

This time I downloaded the needed titles from the U.S. Attorney's Manual, especially on RICO, which helped me structure my Civil RICO Act Complaint.

This will be a whole new ballgame of a Second Amendment case.

[Blackwater OPS]

The surprise will be a damaging ruling against the 2nd amendment.

[rssslvr]

this guy again

[donhamrick]

Originally Posted by Blackwater OPS

The surprise will be a damaging ruling against the 2nd amendment.

You don't know ******** about my case!

[Shane916]

Originally Posted by donhamrick

You don't know ******** about my case!

I don't Any way to sum it up in a brief right to the point paragraph ?

[donhamrick]

Originally Posted by rssslvr

this guy again

The day will come. I will win my case.

Yeah! This guy again! What do you expect when the government violates your rights? Just let them do it without any resistance at all?


Edited for language and rude comments

[blkA4alb]

Originally Posted by donhamrick

You are one sorry excuse for a human being.

You're not moving up at all in my book. Boy you sure know how to gain some respect.

[rssslvr]

Originally Posted by donhamrick

The day will come. I will win my case.

Yeah! This guy again! What do you expect when the government violates your rights? Just let them do it without any resistance at all?

Don I really hope that day does come but I just don't see that happening.I don't think you stand much of a chance.Who knows I could be wrong but I don't think I am.


Quote edited to remove language and rude comments.

[BigMac]

Hey I respect your effort. I dont respect personal attacks. Don't stoop to them and loose credibility.

[rssslvr]

[quote=donhamrick]

My case is a GOLD MINE for publicity for the NRA, Second Amendment Foundation, KeepAndBearArms.com, etc. etc. But because I am litigating for National Open Carry in intrastate and interstate travel all those gun rights advocacy groups ignored my case. [quote]


They have ignored it because they know you probably won't win