Calguns.net  

Home My iTrader Join the NRA Donate to CGSSA Sponsors CGN Google Search
CA Semiauto Ban(AW)ID Flowchart CA Handgun Ban ID Flowchart CA Shotgun Ban ID Flowchart
Go Back   Calguns.net > POLITICS, LITIGATION AND ACTIVISM > California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism
Reload this Page NORDYKE III Orals.
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

California 2nd Amend. Political Discussion & Activism Discuss gun rights activism and 2A related political topics here. All advice given is NOT legal counsel.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:09 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,361
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default NORDYKE III Orals.
Sorry I jumped the gun. Not ruled from the bench.
__________________
Coyote Point Armory
341 Beach Road
Burlingame CA 94010
650-315-2210
http://CoyotePointArmory.com
Last edited by dantodd; 10-19-2010 at 1:25 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:10 PM
bodger's Avatar
bodger bodger is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,019
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default
Thanks!
Any link to more info or live updates?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:10 PM
Havoc70's Avatar
Havoc70 Havoc70 is offline
CGSSA Leader
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 801
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default
HELL YES! And didn't the court say "strict scrutiny"? It seems like since Alameda allowed CCW holders onto the fairgrounds, that lost them the "sensitive area" argument as even CCW holders can't enter sensitive areas.

HELL YAH AGAIN!
__________________
http://archon.silvertree.org/Solano.jpg
Proud Veteran Aerial Gunner - De inimico non loquaris sed cogites

"A “right” entitles an individual to do something, and is not dependent on the graces of the government." - Alan Gura Ezell v. Chicago

"The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding." - Justice Louis Brandeis Dissenting, Olmstead v. United States
Last edited by Havoc70; 10-19-2010 at 1:11 PM.. Reason: Homonyms are my undoing.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:10 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,361
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
Twitter from @calgunsfdn That's where I got my info.
__________________
Coyote Point Armory
341 Beach Road
Burlingame CA 94010
650-315-2210
http://CoyotePointArmory.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:11 PM
RivCoFireman's Avatar
RivCoFireman RivCoFireman is offline
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Beaumont, CA
Posts: 68
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
I thought that's what that meant.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:11 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,361
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Havoc70 View Post
HELL YES! And didn't the court say "strict scrutiny"? It seems like sense Alameda allowed CCW holders onto the fairgrounds, that lost them the "sensitive area" argument as even CCW holders can't enter sensitive areas.

HELL YAH AGAIN!
From what I sw posted (I'm not there) it sounds like they didn't feel the ordinance would even pass a rational basis test.
__________________
Coyote Point Armory
341 Beach Road
Burlingame CA 94010
650-315-2210
http://CoyotePointArmory.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:11 PM
ocspeedracer's Avatar
ocspeedracer ocspeedracer is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: OC
Posts: 1,148
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default
More details please!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:12 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,361
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocspeedracer View Post
More details please!
Go look at http://www.twitter.com/calgunsfdn for the blow by blow.
__________________
Coyote Point Armory
341 Beach Road
Burlingame CA 94010
650-315-2210
http://CoyotePointArmory.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:12 PM
krucam krucam is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Dallas/Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 333
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
Oh come on!!! Enough with the tease! We're watching this with fingers/toes crossed out East...
__________________
Mark C.
DFW, TX
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:15 PM
HowardW56's Avatar
HowardW56 HowardW56 is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,888
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default
Wasn't "Please strike the ordinance", Don Kilmers statement?

They wouldn't have ruled from the bench...
__________________
Last edited by HowardW56; 10-19-2010 at 1:17 PM.. Reason: add'l info
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:16 PM
Havoc70's Avatar
Havoc70 Havoc70 is offline
CGSSA Leader
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 801
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default
From twitter:

Quote:
McDonald emphasizes that the 2A is a substantial fundamental right, suggesting strict scrutiny - why shouldn't we apply strict scrutiny?
To me that says the court was going to apply strict.
__________________
http://archon.silvertree.org/Solano.jpg
Proud Veteran Aerial Gunner - De inimico non loquaris sed cogites

"A “right” entitles an individual to do something, and is not dependent on the graces of the government." - Alan Gura Ezell v. Chicago

"The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding." - Justice Louis Brandeis Dissenting, Olmstead v. United States
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:16 PM
Kodemonkey's Avatar
Kodemonkey Kodemonkey is offline
Dates Hi-Profile Chicks
CGN Contributor
  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,906
iTrader: 6 / 100%
Default
wohoo!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:16 PM
emcon5's Avatar
emcon5 emcon5 is offline
Veteran Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reno
Posts: 3,283
iTrader: 10 / 100%
Default
Where are you seeing that?

http://twitter.com/CalgunsFDN
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:16 PM
Exile Machine's Avatar
Exile Machine Exile Machine is offline
No longer in Business
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 9,566
iTrader: 96 / 100%
Default
__________________
Manufacturer of CA AWB Compliance Products from Oct 2009 to Nov 2018
Last edited by Exile Machine; 10-19-2010 at 1:23 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:17 PM
kf6tac kf6tac is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,779
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardW56 View Post
Wasn't "Please strike the ordinance", Don Kilmers statement?
That's what I got out of it. "Please strike the ordinance" was the last thing said by counsel at the bar. Then "Court adjourned" is the person updating the tweets indicating that court is, well, adjourned.

If the court had ruled from the bench, they probably would've dispensed with the "please" and just said "The ordinance is stricken."
__________________


Statements I make on this forum should not be construed as giving legal advice or forming an attorney-client relationship.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:18 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,361
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
I could have read it wrong. I was dumbfounded that they would rule from the bench like that. But if you read the posts from CalgunsFdn they always put Nordyke: or Alameda: in front if it was one of the litigants speaking and the "please strike the ordinance" and "court adjourned" were a single tweet.
__________________
Coyote Point Armory
341 Beach Road
Burlingame CA 94010
650-315-2210
http://CoyotePointArmory.com
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:18 PM
greasemonkey greasemonkey is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: www.CalgunsFoundation.org
Posts: 2,518
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
Oooh, I like!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:19 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,361
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
hopefully someone who is there will straighten me out if I misread it. I really hope not but I'm starting to suspect that is the case.
__________________
Coyote Point Armory
341 Beach Road
Burlingame CA 94010
650-315-2210
http://CoyotePointArmory.com
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:19 PM
Havoc70's Avatar
Havoc70 Havoc70 is offline
CGSSA Leader
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 801
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default
I'm sure we'll get more info from those in the courtroom in two weeks .
__________________
http://archon.silvertree.org/Solano.jpg
Proud Veteran Aerial Gunner - De inimico non loquaris sed cogites

"A “right” entitles an individual to do something, and is not dependent on the graces of the government." - Alan Gura Ezell v. Chicago

"The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding." - Justice Louis Brandeis Dissenting, Olmstead v. United States
Last edited by Havoc70; 10-19-2010 at 1:51 PM.. Reason: My assumption was bad, bad I say!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:20 PM
ocspeedracer's Avatar
ocspeedracer ocspeedracer is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: OC
Posts: 1,148
iTrader: 7 / 100%
Default
so what does this mean?
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:21 PM
stix213's Avatar
stix213 stix213 is offline
AKA: Joe Censored
CGN Contributor - Lifetime
  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Rafael
Posts: 17,126
iTrader: 8 / 100%
Default
this is why I hate twitter
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:21 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,361
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocspeedracer View Post
so what does this mean?
I'm trying to find out. Either we're having a big celebration or I misinterpreted a tweet.
__________________
Coyote Point Armory
341 Beach Road
Burlingame CA 94010
650-315-2210
http://CoyotePointArmory.com
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:21 PM
bandook bandook is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ex-Oakland
Posts: 1,228
iTrader: 20 / 100%
Default
False alarm...
(I'll drink the beer anyway )
Last edited by bandook; 10-19-2010 at 1:24 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:22 PM
kf6tac kf6tac is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,779
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by dantodd View Post
I could have read it wrong. I was dumbfounded that they would rule from the bench like that. But if you read the posts from CalgunsFdn they always put Nordyke: or Alameda: in front if it was one of the litigants speaking and the "please strike the ordinance" and "court adjourned" were a single tweet.
Yeah, it's confusing. Though if court were adjourned, they may have needed to hammer out the tweet in a hurry before getting ushered out of the area or getting out of the way of people leaving the room.
__________________


Statements I make on this forum should not be construed as giving legal advice or forming an attorney-client relationship.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:23 PM
Barbarossa's Avatar
Barbarossa Barbarossa is offline
Veteran Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Alameda County
Posts: 4,450
iTrader: 4 / 100%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by bandook View Post
False alarm...
GAH!!!!
__________________
Looking for a 3" Magnum 870 $200-$250ish
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:24 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,361
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
Not ruled from the bench. It was Don's statement then the court adjourned.

sorry for jumping the gun.
__________________
Coyote Point Armory
341 Beach Road
Burlingame CA 94010
650-315-2210
http://CoyotePointArmory.com
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:29 PM
greasemonkey greasemonkey is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: www.CalgunsFoundation.org
Posts: 2,518
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
Eh, it happens. By the looks of the twitter feed, the arguments seemed to be going well, though. At least we're used to patiently waiting for the Nordyke decision...
Quote:
Originally Posted by dantodd View Post
Not ruled from the bench. It was Don's statement then the court adjourned.

sorry for jumping the gun.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:30 PM
The Shadow's Avatar
The Shadow The Shadow is offline
Veteran Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,213
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
Could this potentially settle the issue on other public buildings that are deemed sensitive by the wave of a hand and the whim of local government authorities?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:36 PM
RivCoFireman's Avatar
RivCoFireman RivCoFireman is offline
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Beaumont, CA
Posts: 68
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
Wouldn't the court be in recess if they needed to decide, Once they adjourn I thought it is over.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:36 PM
tiki tiki is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Uranus
Posts: 1,442
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.


Oh, wait...
__________________
"The problem with quotes found on the Internet is you have no way of confirming their authenticity."
-Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:39 PM
HowardW56's Avatar
HowardW56 HowardW56 is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,888
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by RivCoFireman View Post
Wouldn't the court be in recess if they needed to decide, Once they adjourn I thought it is over.
Once they adjourn the hearing is over....


They still need to confer and decide the case, and then one or more of of the judges will prepare the opinion.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:42 PM
dantodd dantodd is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Carlos
Posts: 9,361
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiki View Post
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.


Oh, wait...
Hopefully it won't be a Dewey Defeats Truman moment. I don't mind jumping the gun IF the decision goes the right way.
__________________
Coyote Point Armory
341 Beach Road
Burlingame CA 94010
650-315-2210
http://CoyotePointArmory.com
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-19-2010, 1:54 PM
Glock22Fan's Avatar
Glock22Fan Glock22Fan is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles County
Posts: 5,752
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Default
I know that the judges will rule "in two weeks" but is there any real deadline for this result?
__________________
John -- bitter gun owner.

All opinions expressed here are my own unless I say otherwise.
I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.

Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-19-2010, 2:03 PM
oepirate oepirate is offline
Member
CGN Contributor
  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fremont, Alameda County
Posts: 225
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Default
Don was so inspiring. Time to go donate some more. I almost felt bad for the alameda attorney. Almost.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-19-2010, 2:07 PM
HowardW56's Avatar
HowardW56 HowardW56 is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,888
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glock22Fan View Post
I know that the judges will rule "in two weeks" but is there any real deadline for this result?

Nope...

But this is the same panel that heard the case before. I bet it won't take that long. Maybe January...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-19-2010, 2:08 PM
HowardW56's Avatar
HowardW56 HowardW56 is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,888
iTrader: 21 / 100%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by dantodd View Post
Hopefully it won't be a Dewey Defeats Truman moment. I don't mind jumping the gun IF the decision goes the right way.
Lets hope not....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-19-2010, 2:16 PM
Liberty1's Avatar
Liberty1 Liberty1 is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,543
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Shadow View Post
Could this potentially settle the issue on other public buildings that are deemed sensitive by the wave of a hand and the whim of local government authorities?
Ca already allows carry in gov. buildings with a PC 12050 License to Carrying.
__________________
False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
-- Cesare Beccaria http://www.a-human-right.com/
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-19-2010, 2:18 PM
Crom Crom is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,621
iTrader: 5 / 100%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Shadow View Post
Could this potentially settle the issue on other public buildings that are deemed sensitive by the wave of a hand and the whim of local government authorities?
I don't think so. I understand that we'll need separate litigation to explore the sensitive places doctrine that SOCTUS wrote about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glock22Fan View Post
I know that the judges will rule "in two weeks" but is there any real deadline for this result?
I don't know but I did a cursory search for opinions being published from the 9th. Civil cases with oral arguments at their longest took 9 months, most appeared to take 4-6 months and a few only three months. I hope we don't have to wait too long.
__________________

Last edited by Crom; 10-19-2010 at 2:21 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-19-2010, 2:20 PM
Liberty1's Avatar
Liberty1 Liberty1 is offline
Calguns Addict
  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,543
iTrader: 2 / 100%
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glock22Fan View Post
I know that the judges will rule "in two weeks" but is there any real deadline for this result?
None, but this panel will do their job in a timely fashion. I expect 2-3 months.
__________________
False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
-- Cesare Beccaria http://www.a-human-right.com/
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-19-2010, 2:29 PM
Anti-Hero's Avatar
Anti-Hero Anti-Hero is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,572
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Default
Is there a transcript of the oral arguments?
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 9:46 AM.



Advertise on Calguns.net - Contact Us - Calguns.net - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Proudly hosted by GeoVario the Premier 2A host.
Calguns.net, the 'Calguns' name and all associated variants and logos are ® Trademark and © Copyright 2002-2018, Calguns.net an Incorporated Company All Rights Reserved.
Calguns.net and The Calguns Foundation have no affiliation and are in no way related to each other.
All opinions, statements and remarks made by Calguns.net on this web site and elsewhere are solely attributable to Calguns.net.